moar's lawyer friend cannot stand the bullying of landlords here anymore! !!
she wants to restore balance to the force.
she asks ALL EDWM'ers who are landlords to insert this clause into their rental contract, be it now or in future.
CLAUSE:
The Tenant(s) hereby agrees to relinquish, to the Landlord during the duration of this tenancy agreement, all rights to CDC vouchers, GST vouchers, and/or Service and Conservancy Charges (S&CC) rebates, as may be disbursed by the Republic of Singapore in connection with the property rented by the Tenant(s) under this agreement.
once this clause is in, NO MORE DISPUTES.
EVERYTHING BELONGS TO THE LANDLORD !!!!!
LET THE LION ROAR... ARRGGGGHHHHH
There is no dispute nor comparison. Rentee will need to know their place. U dare to one on one with your landlord?moar's lawyer friend cannot stand the bullying of landlords here anymore! !!
she wants to restore balance to the force.
she asks ALL EDWM'ers who are landlords to insert this clause into their rental contract, be it now or in future.
CLAUSE:
The Tenant(s) hereby agrees to relinquish, to the Landlord during the duration of this tenancy agreement, all rights to CDC vouchers, GST vouchers, and/or Service and Conservancy Charges (S&CC) rebates, as may be disbursed by the Republic of Singapore in connection with the property rented by the Tenant(s) under this agreement.
once this clause is in, NO MORE DISPUTES.
EVERYTHING BELONGS TO THE LANDLORD !!!!!
LET THE LION ROAR... ARRGGGGHHHHH
if you are renting a room.. or stay with the owner.. i think you can go cc to appeal..I've encountered the same issue and I'm renting, pink IC but new house not ready yet...
Can only LLST and let landlord claim all the vouchers, it is for the owner of the house not the renters...
There is no dispute nor comparison. Rentee will need to know their place. U dare to one on one with your landlord?
checked the link, there is no black and white.Lol this just proves EDMW peeps all no brain. Come limpei give you answer from CDC directly. (https://vouchers.cdc.gov.sg/contact-us)
>
> 1. If the landlord and Singaporean tenant are both residing in the same unit, they are eligible to 1 household set of CDC vouchers each. If one party has claimed the vouchers, the other party can visit the CC to fill up the appeal form (bring NRIC and supporting documents e.g. tenancy agreement).
>
> 2. **If the landlord is owning the unit but not residing there, they should not claim for the CDC vouchers, as every household can only claim for the CDC vouchers under one property they are residing in.** You may get the landlord to update their registered residential address with the ICA.
>
checked the link, there is no black and white.
nothing mention in FAQ or T&C leh.
can provide more solid proof ?
u can only register 1 address with ICA.Now the fundamental question.
Each household get $500. If a person has 2 properties rented out and he also stay in a 3rd condo. He gets $500 x 3?
If so, then why is the rich benefitting?
not legal and can render rental agreement invalid.
your 'lawyer friend ' doesnt read laws. you are the 'lawyer friend'moar's lawyer friend cannot stand the bullying of landlords here anymore! !!
she wants to restore balance to the force.
she asks ALL EDWM'ers who are landlords to insert this clause into their rental contract, be it now or in future.
CLAUSE:
The Tenant(s) hereby agrees to relinquish, to the Landlord during the duration of this tenancy agreement, all rights to CDC vouchers, GST vouchers, and/or Service and Conservancy Charges (S&CC) rebates, as may be disbursed by the Republic of Singapore in connection with the property rented by the Tenant(s) under this agreement.
once this clause is in, NO MORE DISPUTES.
EVERYTHING BELONGS TO THE LANDLORD !!!!!
LET THE LION ROAR... ARRGGGGHHHHH
moar's friend can tell you it's absolutely legal.... simply assignment of rights.
chop and stamp 100%
if you disagree, point case laws to support / substantiate
moar's friend can tell you it's absolutely legal.... simply assignment of rights.
chop and stamp 100%
if you disagree, point case laws to support / substantiate