2.5 Gbps is not much and in fact it is just good to use. 2.5G not more and not less. I am a Starhub Homehub+ Ultra Speed user. Yes i do not think we need 25 Gbps in the next 5 years especially for home user. 10G is good enough. It will not make sense for ISP to upgrade back end equipment again to support 25 Gbps internet service as they just upgrading to 10 Gbps. Since 1G till now, how many years?so much speed for what
1 camera lens 2-3k liaoIt depends on what you want.
Every time I upgrade to a new plan, I use it as a chance to learn new things. Now I treat learning home networking as a hobby. It is much cheaper than playing with Hi-Fi or Photography.
S$1000 spent in year 2023, to upgrade some gears to 2.5G.
S$1000 spent so far in year 2024 to upgrade to mix 2.5G/10G stuff. Maybe more to come (missing true WiFi 7 router with 6GHz band and 10G WAN port).
Based on history, i guess likely 2032 trial only. But no home user will support if too expensive.
So inconvenient to carry the camera. Better mobile manufacturers have a phone good for taking good photo.1 camera lens 2-3k liao
good speakers also more expensive
both have their uses, although you're not wrong in saying the smartphones are a lot more convenient.
But manufacturers should improve on it as not good enough.
In Jan 2014 then we started to have 1G internet, in 2023 then SH Trial 10G. So I guess by 2032 Trial and 2033 launch 25G. In 2024 Govt just offered $100 Million grant to help ISP upgrade backend equipment and it is unlikely that within 5 years Govt offer grant again. Unless ISP buy backend equipment for 25 or 50 Gbps now but provision for 10 Gbps use now. Then they can launch earlier a bit. The problem will be price or money. Many people just want cheapest and can surf the internet will do. If it take 5 min to download a big file now and in future it is just 3 min, will you pay $186/mth just to be 2 min faster. Not for me for sure. Now with the SH ONR speed back to normal, user can actually sign 10G at $59 which is cheap. Ultra sports at $65 also good.
how much of your traffic is really international? there's already a pretty solid chunk of bandwidth passing through IX fabrics, and even more through PNIs between ISPs and content providers. much of the content you're consuming is cached or served locally one way or another. and besides, subsea cable capacity is coming up at a pretty brisk clip anyway
must wait and see.
My guess is this time most ISP may be already upgrading backend to be able to support up to 25 or 50 Gbps but never tell us and just provision to 10G for us now. When about to trial then they will tell us. Also possible.
10Gbps hetzner servers in Europe
anyway if it's cache/served locally, does a house of 5 and under really need 10Gbps or more?
I rather they provide better solutions to reduce latency rather than to places like China or some parts of Europe.
The problem is that things like ipv6, better routing, static ip, sfp+ ONU etc. are not as marketable to your average person who knows nothing about networking compared to big flashy speed numbers.10Gbps hetzner servers in Europe
anyway if it's cache/served locally, does a house of 5 and under really need 10Gbps or more?
I rather they provide better solutions to reduce latency rather than to places like China or some parts of Europe.
If the ISP is providing you with a public IPv6 address (actually a range of addresses) with a /56 prefix (or even a /58 prefix) that means you have plenty of capacity to assign IPv6 addresses (within your delegated range) to individual devices on your home network. Which means applications running on your devices would typically be able to communicate more easily with remote systems, without relying on as many intermediate systems/proxies. It also means they can directly reach IPv6-only resources which may help improve throughput, responsiveness, and reliability ā especially when IPv4-based resources are unreachable or otherwise performing poorly.
