
Can go lunch liao guys later than continueCourt adjourns for lunch
The court adjourns for lunch until 2.30pm.
After the break, Mr Andre Jumabhoy will continue his cross-examination of Ms Raeesah Khan, which he says he hopes to complete today.
Ivy League or go home.U now then know these Aussie degrees are low standard? Esp Murdoch.
Sydney, Melbourne, ANU only decent ones
Govt scholars dont go to Australia. Only Singaporeans who cant qualify for local Unis and have money go.
absolutely
the things she said during election before she turn mp is already
then the lie, then the things she said to back up what she said early, then the people she said who should be involved rather than her for the things she said![]()
Can psychiatrist or those certify body language expert..and other way is look at her eye movementsIs there a way to prove RK always zoned out and disconnected from reality?
Singh father lor![]()
who is the guy with red turban? (pic from the Straits Times 16 Oct 2024).
She really sabo king sia lolWah, like that she potentially can get her former aides into serious trouble sia....
This woman really, is a serious liability even to her loyal former aides.![]()
Gen Z wokies were praising her as a queen when she won. Turns out is sabo queen.She really sabo king sia lol
Ms. Loh Pei Ying, a former WP cadre, testified during the Committee of Privileges (COP) hearing. Key points from her testimony:
1. Raeesah Khan confided in her: Loh stated that Khan shared her intention to reveal her sexual assault experience in Parliament.
2. No direction from WP leaders: Loh testified that WP leaders did not instruct Khan to lie or reveal the information.
3. Concerns about Khan's well-being: Loh expressed worries about Khan's mental health and potential backlash.
4. Internal discussions: Loh revealed internal WP discussions about Khan's statement, including concerns about its accuracy.
5. Pritam Singh's involvement: Loh stated that Singh was aware of Khan's intention to speak about her experience but did not know the details.
Loh's testimony provided insight into:
1. WP's internal dynamics
2. Khan's thought process and motivations
3. The party's handling of sensitive information
Observations:
1. Loh's testimony seemed to corroborate some aspects of Khan's account.
2. Her statements highlighted internal WP discussions and concerns.
3. The testimony shed light on WP's leadership and decision-making processes.
Sources:
- Channel News Asia (CNA)
- The Straits Times
- Committee of Privileges Report
Why his father so white but he so dark or is it the camera...Singh father lor
The more i read the more i feel RK is really a low calibre mp. The only thing that she stand out is she is a social entrepreneur and started a company. Other then that she really got nothing. She don't seem to be able to process her thoughts and even basic things like don't lie in parliament, she also don't know.
Go parliament and tell a make up story to accuse police of something is really something else. Some more her speech she dare direct it to ministry of home affairs. You tell a fake story accusing ministry of home affairs in parliament like they are not doing their job correctly then you expect them don't investigate and get back to you meh.
I really don't know why she wants to bring out that story she accompanied victim to police and victim got discriminated, other then to show she social justice warrior.
Wp really need to vet their candidates for next election probably. Already pre election got show she make racist comment online liao.
One can infer that she's high all the time
Camera lighting and angle lorWhy his father so white but he so dark or is it the camera...