[LIVE AS WE GO] Pritam Singh goes on trial for charges of lying to Parliament

[enigmastar]

for all the people she so "smart" choose to stir trouble with Ministry of Home affair ... someone who bite and dont let go ..

Ya loh. She don't know that guy is a top lawyer meh. Not someone u can play play with.

 

[LeiHongYi]

How did she get far? Just open mouth only. Murdoch Uni no standards

Murdoch, a lot of Singaporeans go there. a singaporean can go there and then meet many other fellow Singaporeans. I have not been there. But it sounds to me that there is a small community of Singaporeans.

Maybe cuz it's very near Singapore, easy for the kids to fly to and fro home. But people that I know grad from there, all cannot make it to jc because they flunked mother tongue in O level. Some of them do a three year dip in pot then go there. but they all gave me the impression, during their O's that they not worried about their O level results or future, cuz their lao pei got money.

 

[mryang]

I got a feeling later after lunch RK will "zoned out" and claim she has a heavy lunch.

Wonder how the lawyer can do cross examination on her later.

Ask her to go toilet to vomit it out done

 

[Emperor_Hippo]

Is there a way to prove RK always zoned out and disconnected from reality?

Tie her up and force blood test her loh.

see she got high or not.

even if detect 0.0000000001 micronanopico gramme of any high substance, instantly get the media to flip their lid over it that she's constantly high.

 

[LeiHongYi]

Singh father lor

ohhh so handsome one ah.

 

[testart]

Tie her up and force blood test her loh.

see she got high or not.

even if detect 0.0000000001 micronanopico gramme of any high substance, instantly get the media to flip their lid over it that she's constantly high.

Wah.So extreme test.
But see her performance later after lunch lor.

 

[mryang]

ohhh so handsome one ah.

Your favourite?

 

[Emperor_Hippo]

I got a feeling later after lunch RK will "zoned out" and claim she has a heavy lunch.

Wonder how the lawyer can do cross examination on her later.

EAT LESSER LAH!!!!

the secret of zero post-lunch coma is to skip lunch altogether.

 

[LeiHongYi]

Your favourite?

*PINCH********

 

[Emperor_Hippo]

Wah.So extreme test.
But see her performance later after lunch lor.

Den she will complain post lunch coma.

 

[Ironside]

who is the guy with red turban? (pic from the Straits Times 16 Oct 2024).

I not 100% sure. But looks like 萧远山。

 

[fryderyk]

i dont know why i see her in the photo walking out of court or walking in court , like she very calming ...

normally people go court will feel nervous

 

[lowveld]

I feel she gives the vibe like always in a daze and zoned out.

She sort of like disconnected from reality. Then keep acting like she lost in her own world or daydreaming.

And she seem isn't fully present or aware of what's going on around her.

Do you guys feel so?

Like on drugs?

 

[Emperor_Hippo]

Murdoch, a lot of Singaporeans go there. a singaporean can go there and then meet many other fellow Singaporeans. I have not been there. But it sounds to me that there is a small community of Singaporeans.

Maybe cuz it's very near Singapore, easy for the kids to fly to and fro home. But people that I know grad from there, all cannot make it to jc because they flunked mother tongue in O level. Some of them do a three year dip in pot then go there. but they all gave me the impression, during their O's that they not worried about their O level results or future, cuz their lao pei got money.

If laopeh got money, jit tao Ivy League, Cambridge, Oxford, 北清东大 already.

why still go ozzie?

 

[fryderyk]

Like on drugs?

i believe is medication like sleeping pill or those pill for depression to calm

 

[Emperor_Hippo]

Like on drugs?

Aiyah, I say liao. Dun simi psychiatrist/psychologist observe observe observe.

waste time only.

jit tao catch, tie up, then blood test.

gao dim.

 

[testart]

The more i read the more i feel RK is really a low calibre mp. The only thing that she stand out is she is a social entrepreneur and started a company. Other then that she really got nothing. She don't seem to be able to process her thoughts and even basic things like don't lie in parliament, she also don't know.

Go parliament and tell a make up story to accuse police of something is really something else. Some more her speech she dare direct it to ministry of home affairs. You tell a fake story accusing ministry of home affairs in parliament like they are not doing their job correctly then you expect them don't investigate and get back to you meh.

I really don't know why she wants to bring out that story she accompanied victim to police and victim got discriminated, other then to show she social justice warrior.

Wp really need to vet their candidates for next election probably. Already pre election got show she make racist comment online liao.

Yeah
Her Gender Equality Motion speech cover:
Sexual violence
Sexual education
Survivor Care
Female Genital Cutting
Polygamy

I think later on she got admitted is her experience as survivor?

 

[x1243x]

i dont know why i see her in the photo walking out of court or walking in court , like she very calming ...

normally people go court will feel nervous

she has nothing to lose in this case.. she's not on trial.. her dad is very rich..

 

[Emperor_Hippo]

Wah.So extreme test.
But see her performance later after lunch lor.

No extreme wun get results.

yah, i big fan of Dr Gregory House.

go force induce condition until patient ai see buay see liao, then save them.

 

[testart]

Published: 04 October 2021

1. Minister: Mr. Speaker Sir, I had given Mr Speaker notice that I want to make a short Ministerial Statement. This relates to something that was said in the Parliamentary sitting on the 3rd of August 2021, this year by one of the Members of Parliament, Ms Khan, at the WP’s Motion on Empowering Women.

2. Ms Khan had said that three years ago. She had accompanied a 25- year-old survivor to file a police report against a rape, and that she saw the survivor coming out crying. The survivor told her that the Police officer had made comments about her dressing, and the fact that she had been drinking. Ms Khan also shared her experience with this House about going with the victim to the Police, what she saw after she had filed a report, and she cited it as an example of how law enforcement needs to ensure better treatment of sexual assault survivors.

3. My colleague, MOS Desmond, then asked for more details about the incident, so that the government can investigate what happened. He explained that MHA takes these allegations very seriously, and said that they had to be looked into, to check if the case had been handled properly by the Police, and they should not be swept aside without further investigations.

4. Ms Khan’s response was that she had raised the example as it was her personal experience with a rape survivor. She also stated her belief that these anecdotes are not isolated and expressed the hope that such incidents could start further discussions about how victims are treated. She went on to say that the incident happened three years ago, and she did not wish to re-traumatize the survivor, whom she had accompanied.

5. Later in the debate, Ms Khan rose again to further clarify that she raised the example because it was her experience with a survivor, and that the episode took place three years ago, and she had been unsuccessful in getting in touch with the victim. She said this in the context that, I quote, “consent is imperative, not least to avoid re-victimisation”.

6. We take such allegations concerning the Police very seriously. Ms Khan has said she didn’t want the victim to be re-traumatised or re-victimised. I understand and empathize with that, and we will bear that in mind as we seek to investigate what happened, especially since the Member has raised this here in Parliament, to make sure that we know what happened, and if necessary, discipline the Police officers involved. This does not have to mean naming the victim. We will consider carefully how to protect the victim, and deal with this matter sensitively. What is extremely important is that we identify the Police station, the Police officers involved. I have given very clear instructions to the Police that we have to identify the officers involved, get their versions, to be fair to them. And, what further steps are taken, depends on the facts. The government is very serious about making sure that the Police do the right thing. So, if they haven't behaved well, then we must discipline them. That means investigating what happened, identifying the officers involved. That's how we have maintained an excellent Home Team. As I've said, this does not have to mean that the victim has to be named publicly. We will consider carefully how to proceed, so as not to re-traumatize the victim. And, for us to take this further, we need more details.

7. So, can I ask the Member through you, Sir, to tell us at the very least, the Police station that she went to with the victim, and if possible, the names of the Police officer or officers who attended to the victim and the Member. And, if she cannot remember the names, then some details – how many officers were there, some description of them, rough age, race, male or female – whatever details she can give. And when the Member saw the victim come out crying after her interview, did the Member bring this to the Police officers’ attention? What did the Member say to the officers? How did the officers respond when alerted to the victim’s reaction? And did the Member lodge a complaint about what happened either at the time, or after that? I think the Member should be able to remember the month, the year when this happened, when she went to the Police station. She told Parliament that this happened. She told the Parliament three times that this happened three years ago. Can she confirm that this took place in 2018?

8. I should add that, you know, since we take very seriously all these points, Police have spent a lot of time searching their records, since this point was made. They don't seem to be able to identify a case where Ms Khan was present with a victim. It is entirely possible that they didn’t note down Ms Khan’s name, but it is most important that the matter is not left hanging with doubt over what may or may not have happened. And as I have said, our focus is on the Police officers, the reputation of the Singapore Police Force, to help the victim, and for us to find out what happened, and to try and make sure the Police officers understand better if indeed it happened in this way, and change their behavior if necessary, and for the message to go out to all Police officers.

9. So, Sir, through you, may I ask Ms Khan for those details?

10. Speaker: Ms Raeesah Khan, if you can furnish the details please, thank you.

11. MP Raeesah Khan: Thank you, Minister for the clarifications. Like I said, it did happen three years ago and I haven't been successful getting in touch with the person that I accompanied. And, you know, with regards to confidentiality, I would prefer for it to remain that way. Thank you.

12. Minister: Sir, I asked which Police station, and which month, and the identities of the officers to the extent that Ms Khan knows them.

13. Speaker: Ms Khan, to facilitate the investigation by Police to check?

14. MP Raeesah Khan: Thank you. I do not know the identity of the Police officers.

15. Speaker: The questions on Police station, date, etc?

16. MP Raeesah Khan: With regards to confidentiality with the survivor, I would not like to reveal any of this information. Thank you.

17. Minister: We are talking about the Police station. It's got nothing to do confidentiality of the survivor.

18. Speaker: Ms Raeesah Khan, Minister is not asking about the identity of individual.

19. MP Raeesah Khan: I understand, but with regards to confidentiality, I will not be revealing that any other information. Thank you.

20. Minister: I have to say that, perhaps Mr Speaker has the power to direct answers, since the matter has been raised, and through you, Sir, I ask for a direction to be given, that we be told which Police station and the month – if not a date, at least a month – and which Police station.

21. Speaker: Ms Khan, I think that's a fair question. Would you like to respond, or are you holding to the same position? The reason is that certain allegations have been made, which I think are fair and serious, and the Police, I understand, would like to follow up to check to make sure that they can rectify the situation. So, any leads will be useful, without divulging the name of the lady concerned.

22. MP Raeesah Khan: Thank you, I still like for it to remain confidential. Thank you.

23. Minister: Sir, I don't understand this point about confidentiality. Can I ask through you, Sir, for Ms Khan to confirm in this House that everything she has told us is accurate, that she did accompany such a person, and such an incident did happen?

24. MP Raeesah Khan: Yes.

25. Minister: Sir, we have checked our records. We have no such case that fits in with the description that has been given by the Member. I wanted to give her the option of giving us the best information she has, that she confirms that such an incident happened, that she accompanied the victim to the Police station, and that she does not wish to divulge the information only because of confidentiality. Speaker and Members will know that confidentiality doesn't extend to not telling us which Police station.

26. And Sir, I will leave it here for now, but that does not mean the matter rests. The police will investigate this very serious matter further. The officers in charge in the Police will interview Ms Khan, and any allegations of misconduct concerning specific officers will be referred to SPF’s Internal Affairs Office for further investigation. Because I will say to Ms Khan, through you Sir, that at the very least, she must remember which Police station, which year this happened in which month, and some details of the number and the ages and races of the Police officers who she says, and she has confirmed for us that she did see them. Thank you, Sir.

https://www.mha.gov.sg/mediaroom/pa...or-law-mr-k-shanmugam-and-mp-ms-raeesah-khan/