[LIVE AS WE GO] Pritam Singh goes on trial for charges of lying to Parliament

[Shion]

This time I think less liao. Things like worse than last elections. Knn the cost of living now really is high like hell can, that is the main issue I think.

dont underestimate the level of daftness...

 

[dezzo69]

dag logic is that any material that is not in favor of the agenda of fixing Pritam is to be considered irrelevant.

correct. becoz the witnesses are all from WP anyways so it will damage the image of the party anyways.

 

[lizzykai]

Yes, so far, he is very on the ball and neutral

if he reject this abit ridiculous imo

 

[TitanSmall]

today LTK 白来了？

 

[carey]

Think some ppl gonna be scrambling to produce proper reasons for redaction liao.

Theoretically should already be provided woah

To do it now is tampering hor

 

[Eyelust]

Deputy Principal District Judge Luke Tan to review message logs alongside evidence from Yudhishthra Nathan

District Judge Luke Tan says that while the messages in question were sent after Oct 4, 2021, they might relate to the testimonies of Mr Yudishthra Nathan and Ms Loh Pei Ying about their meeting with Pritam Singh on October 12, 2021.

Mr Nathan and Ms Loh had testified in court that it was during this meeting that Singh told them he met Ms Raeesah Khan on Oct 3, 2021, and had told Ms Khan he would not judge her regardless of whether she maintained her lie or clarified it.

“So the issue of their credibility especially leading up to the 12th, and even on the 12th, is an issue. Because it goes to whether their evidence is to be believed or not,” says Judge Tan.

Deputy Attorney-General Ang Cheng Hock says “differences between them on the 12th is actually very narrow”, but adds that he will deal with this at the appropriate time.

He adds that the prosecution will present one set of unredacted messages from Mr Nathan from Oct 4 to Oct 12, as well as a set with redactions that was submitted to the Committee of Privileges, and the reasons for the redaction.

The Judge says he will need to review the documents alongside Mr Nathan’s evidence, before making a decision on the matter.

The hearing has ended for the day and will resume at 11am tomorrow.

Hahaha var check in progress.... Potential foul during build up play...

 

[fire]

"Deputy Attorney-General Ang Cheng Hock says “differences between them on the 12th is actually very narrow”, but adds that he will deal with this at the appropriate time"

Then why so defensive to release sia

 

[rizhal]

Deputy Principal District Judge Luke Tan to review message logs alongside evidence from Yudhishthra Nathan

District Judge Luke Tan says that while the messages in question were sent after Oct 4, 2021, they might relate to the testimonies of Mr Yudishthra Nathan and Ms Loh Pei Ying about their meeting with Pritam Singh on October 12, 2021.

Mr Nathan and Ms Loh had testified in court that it was during this meeting that Singh told them he met Ms Raeesah Khan on Oct 3, 2021, and had told Ms Khan he would not judge her regardless of whether she maintained her lie or clarified it.

“So the issue of their credibility especially leading up to the 12th, and even on the 12th, is an issue. Because it goes to whether their evidence is to be believed or not,” says Judge Tan.

Deputy Attorney-General Ang Cheng Hock says “differences between them on the 12th is actually very narrow”, but adds that he will deal with this at the appropriate time.

He adds that the prosecution will present one set of unredacted messages from Mr Nathan from Oct 4 to Oct 12, as well as a set with redactions that was submitted to the Committee of Privileges, and the reasons for the redaction.

The Judge says he will need to review the documents alongside Mr Nathan’s evidence, before making a decision on the matter.

The hearing has ended for the day and will resume at 11am tomorrow.

Long live Justice Bao !!!! the judge is doing the needful to review the redacted material !

 

[Eyelust]

Deputy Principal District Judge Luke Tan to review message logs alongside evidence from Yudhishthra Nathan

District Judge Luke Tan says that while the messages in question were sent after Oct 4, 2021, they might relate to the testimonies of Mr Yudishthra Nathan and Ms Loh Pei Ying about their meeting with Pritam Singh on October 12, 2021.

Mr Nathan and Ms Loh had testified in court that it was during this meeting that Singh told them he met Ms Raeesah Khan on Oct 3, 2021, and had told Ms Khan he would not judge her regardless of whether she maintained her lie or clarified it.

“So the issue of their credibility especially leading up to the 12th, and even on the 12th, is an issue. Because it goes to whether their evidence is to be believed or not,” says Judge Tan.

Deputy Attorney-General Ang Cheng Hock says “differences between them on the 12th is actually very narrow”, but adds that he will deal with this at the appropriate time.

He adds that the prosecution will present one set of unredacted messages from Mr Nathan from Oct 4 to Oct 12, as well as a set with redactions that was submitted to the Committee of Privileges, and the reasons for the redaction.

The Judge says he will need to review the documents alongside Mr Nathan’s evidence, before making a decision on the matter.

The hearing has ended for the day and will resume at 11am tomorrow.

This like mean judge ownself see first then decide if kids like us can see... R21 content...

 

[havetheveryfun]

but how they able to recover the redacted messages if like is deleted from whatsapp directly ?

 

[Akky85]

This time I think less liao. Things like worse than last elections. Knn the cost of living now really is high like hell can, that is the main issue I think.

You severely underestimated the daftness of the majority. Many are of the mindset that the more unstable SG/the world is, the more ''need'' to believe and ''all in'' into PAP.

They are basically gambling their votes at this point.

 

[Kiwi8]

I'm beginning to have faith in this judge

Hold your conclusion yet. I wouldn't be surprised if he denies the defence access to the non redacted material. Magic.

 

[fire]

This like mean judge ownself see first then decide if kids like us can see... R21 content...

It means judge see first then decide if the defence can see

 

[Ironside]

today LTK 白来了？

To give morale support

 

[Mancunian2]

But seriously, even though they won the AHTC case and they may win this Pritam Singh witchhunt case they already have lost in the court of public opinion liao.

you think too highly of sinkies

court of public opinion already won by those cdc vouchers

 

[berger]

what's the point of redacting in the first place to COP? why cannot just give them full

actually can they just refuse to show to COP in the first place?

 

[charleslee1989]

Hahaha var check in progress.... Potential foul during build up play...

Simi potential foul? It should be "Potential Serious Foul during build up play"


This one is red cardable offence one....

 

[Kiwi8]

today LTK 白来了？

cos the Nathan questioning session is takings longer than expected due to the can of worms he opened.

 

[dezzo69]

but how they able to recover the redacted messages if like is deleted from whatsapp directly ?

from what i understand there is an unredacted version. thats how they decide what to redact from.

 

[Eyelust]

It means judge see first then decide if the defence can see

Defence see means we get to see also mAh cause ah boy surely hood all those fishy texts out n say, then erections time sure got take out n say some more one haha