[LIVE AS WE GO] Pritam Singh goes on trial for charges of lying to Parliament

fascist

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2007
Messages
16,716
Reaction score
4,494
Yup. I interpret YN to be insinuating that party leader direction is to continue the lie.. But according to LPY it wasn't the case.
So on one occasion, YN said via WhatApp that "in the first place... not to disclose everything" to continue misdirecting the police.

Then according to LPY, wanted to continue the lie when meeting with Singh.
 

wongkc

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2001
Messages
20,948
Reaction score
8,792
Under 2 charges

1. Asking RK continue to lie in the parliament
2. Lie to COP about no 1

If RK farted in Parliament… she told PS about it… and PS told her “if u have to fart u have to fart”… can charge PS also?

Coz releasing toxic gas in Parliament should be an offence also right… and PS never stop her from farting…

Hypothetically that is…
 

mryang

Banned
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
156,984
Reaction score
17,581
If RK farted in Parliament… she told PS about it… and PS told her “if u have to fart u have to fart”… can charge PS also?

Coz releasing toxic gas in Parliament should be an offence also right… and PS never stop her from farting…

Hypothetically that is…
Basically this court cases about this 😂
 

NTB2DO

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
20,462
Reaction score
3,381
So on one occasion, YN said via WhatApp that "in the first place... not to disclose everything" to continue misdirecting the police.

Then according to LPY, wanted to continue the lie when meeting with Singh.
The whatsapp was sent before they met PS. Then, according to LPY, he made the suggestion (as per whatspp message I assume) to PS again when they (LPY and YN) met PS.

BTW initially when questioned by Jumabhoy, YN said he didn't suggest to PS to continue the lie, but after Jumabhoy told him that LPY acknowledged that he did, then he said he couldn't remember whether he made the suggestion or not. :s22:
 

havetheveryfun

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2010
Messages
28,342
Reaction score
4,901
jumbo boy falling into the trap..

prosecution saying this gonna step into the realm of questioning the integrity of the COP...

if the verdict later is PS found guilty.. jumbo boy gg liao. maybe kena sue for slander
 

Bam25th

Master Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2020
Messages
4,459
Reaction score
3,017
lol a big bunch of liars.

A case of liars say liars say liars lied? But how to trust the words of a liar who said another person lied? Hmmm……

It’s not as if there’s recordings or undisputed evidence. Just some liars saying whatever they wanted……
 

Tyrian

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2001
Messages
10,024
Reaction score
1,646
Not necessarily.

The onus is on the prosecution to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

For he said she said cases, the bar to clear for the prosecution is that the testimony of prosecution witnesses have to be unusually convincing.


Below extracted from Justice Vincent Hoong's judgement in GHI v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGHC 220:
You said it better than me.
 

superjellybelly

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2018
Messages
1,597
Reaction score
1,359
Really a joke when so many of the prosecution witnesses appear to be evasive, forgetful, and untruthful. How can their statements be even taken seriously in the first place.
 

cesc-ark

Master Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2007
Messages
3,351
Reaction score
635
will there be any repercussions for this 3 jokers for wasting so much state resources just because they want to cover their own ass? stupid waste of taxpayers money
 

jeffprobst

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2001
Messages
86,653
Reaction score
12,196
No one will be serious about sg court if PS kena convicted. Those witnesses are not credible at all.
 

nasilemak100

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2013
Messages
44,176
Reaction score
7,887
surprisingly the judge is quite neutral sia

thought he will be pro prosecution side to make his real master happy :ROFLMAO:
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top