Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss Mocks Electoral Boundaries Shift as ‘Merry-go-round’ Without Real Change
Source: The Online Citizen
Date: March 11, 2025
Author: Not Specified
Theme: This article details the recent electoral boundary changes in Singapore and highlights the criticisms surrounding the lack of transparency and perceived superficiality of the changes.
Core Points:
- Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss, a lawyer and former politician, satirized the electoral boundary changes, comparing them to a "merry-go-round" that creates the illusion of movement but ultimately leads to the status quo.
- She humorously pointed out that despite her house remaining unchanged for 30 years, she has been moved politically from Joo Chiat SMC to Marine Parade GRC in 2015 and now to East Coast GRC, emphasizing the arbitrary and unexplained nature of these shifts.
- Chong-Aruldoss used the metaphor of "ant-brainers" to convey a sense of powerlessness among ordinary citizens who are subject to the decisions made by those in authority without any meaningful explanation.
- The article further discusses criticisms from opposition parties like the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) and the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) who questioned the lack of transparency in the redrawing process and expressed concerns about the removal and merging of certain constituencies, particularly in opposition-contested areas.
- While the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee (EBRC) has provided more rationale for its decisions compared to previous reviews, the opposition parties argue that the reasoning remains insufficient and question the justification behind the changes.
- The EBRC defended its independence and stated that the changes are necessary to maintain electoral stability and ensure effective representation.
- The article concludes by raising questions about the transparency and legitimacy of the electoral boundary review process, highlighting the concerns about the lack of public consultation and the potential manipulation of electoral boundaries for political advantage.
Phenomenon: This article highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the fairness and transparency of the electoral boundary review process in Singapore. It showcases how political figures and opposition parties are critical of the process, arguing that it lacks transparency and may be used to manipulate electoral outcomes. This phenomenon reflects the broader concerns about the political landscape in Singapore and the need for greater accountability and citizen participation in the decision-making process.