MatrixFanatic
High Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2004
- Messages
- 34,643
- Reaction score
- 6,896
For once, Bloomberg not stirring shiat for the sake of it.
More reason to vote against such tactics. Otherwise more control will be taken without consultation or consideration of opposing voices.Seriously... why the need to change boundary at every election due to population shift? It is just an excuse for gerrymandering...
If got more pple in the constituency... then suck it up and take up the job... is it have another 5-10K new resident the MP cannot handle? If the MP cannot or unable to handle more workload... can always quit... Pretty sure got others wanting that job... It is never fair who handle more workload... avg 28,000 residents per MP is not an absolute number or game... largest SMC is 33K while the smallest is 22K... if want to talk about numbers than how is this fair...
Changing boundary so often creates confusion for voters... and voters lose their identity to their constituency... no sense of ownership to the place...
New player to the game? hahaha!
At least they bother to show face. Opposite one dun even got shadow. But I still vote opposite.Just curious, stay for entire event or just come in for like 30 mins - 1 hr and leave?
Anyway, for PAP MPs usually everything handled by the RCs personnels in the area one then they just show face abit during events.
I don't even know who is my exact MP in Marine Parade GRC, but their faces plastered all over the HDB lifts, etc.
This kind of thing need to say claim mehhttps://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...ce=website&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=copy
Paywall, but bloomberg got guts
I only dare to sayWhich oppo dare to say gerrymandering
Will get POFMAed even before GE starts
