[GE2025] Punggol GRC

Ec7171

Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2019
Messages
5,457
Reaction score
3,873
They got think.....just that they know themselves that they do not have enough financial and manpower resources to lead Singapore yet.
What if next time they lead a country and use that reason as well?
There is a different between excuses and reasons.
 

rider83

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
10,423
Reaction score
4,543
Punggol has everything, SK has nothing.

SK has to choose between PM Lam and Jamus. Jalan Kayu has to between between NCM and Andre
 

eAtNeAt

High Supremacy Member
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
39,085
Reaction score
4,170
Shocking he said this. It goes against what sg stands for and how public service is organised. Fair, equality and based on fact.
Yet he admit thst he can do behind the process and talk to his 'friend'.

Reminds me of Jo teo telling heng chee how to ask rsaf to stop flying while she speaks.
 

EDMW-Hates-Me

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2019
Messages
44,960
Reaction score
25,117
Gan bo yong, i don't think LW can forget this:


lawrence-wong-meme-gif.gif


Now become your "good friend" ah? 😂
Gan's eye power shot Wong up to the throne. Gan was also promoted to dpm. So not surprising they are on good terms.
 

Jian19

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
99,560
Reaction score
25,473
the new rubbish punggol digital district they built ish leaking every corner of the building

standard have gone so low
The road junction outside waterway point

1 year duno fix and redo how many times
 

dezzo69

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2005
Messages
24,352
Reaction score
7,215
what infrastructure?

everything already built finish since last year.

dun keep smoking lah.
 

Ec7171

Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2019
Messages
5,457
Reaction score
3,873
The crux of the issue still remains the equality of outcome vs equality of opportunity. Nobody expects an equality of outcome (we are both in agreement here); where we differ is on the equality of opportunity.

If the playing field is not level, there's no basis to talk about purely judging singers when they sing. If so, all the greater is the urgency in dismantling/reforming the system.

In the context you cited, there's no discrimination in the equality of opportunity.

As a singer , like you alluded to the type of song you use can have different result.

You want to judge them all by singing the same song at the same time here. Do you think you can find the best singer this way?

We have a world today that is not fair. In a singing competition , every singer will not have the same level of coaching or same type of voice or some type of expression etc etc
One singer will sing first while one might sing it last.

Does the one who sing first has an advantage or the one who sing last has an advantage?
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top