[GE2025] The Workers' Party (WP) Discussion Thread

tmkedmw

Banned
Joined
Feb 16, 2013
Messages
33,505
Reaction score
24,575
PAP scared lose minister, argue that lose ministers is very impactful, sky gonna fall ,oh no what to do.

PS says - 2011 George yeo lost. Minster MFA replaced, does it mean MFA cmi? MFA suddenly start malfunctioning? No right? There, u got ur ans.
PS also said ESM Goh said George Yeo is core member of the cabinet, not just a minister.
 

kimsix

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2009
Messages
19,555
Reaction score
9,531
Ya her job is to market the jlb work of mayor

Thought we seen everything, but plant jiu plant
 

Emperor_Hippo

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Messages
24,990
Reaction score
10,257
Pinky ownself place ownself SM, but he is just passe, another paper weight/dead weight, trying to look relevant & heavy weight
erm..... Ministers who move on and pass on their former positions to successors got 2 choices:
- Stay on to contribute. Means be Senior Minister.
- Retire. Means leave as Minister.

Pinky still contributing to govt work actively. that's why he's SM what. :o
 

justln

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2004
Messages
30,653
Reaction score
5,761
Voices from Workers’ Party Rally — Tampines GRC — 26 April 2025


🎤 We hit the ground at Temasek JC to hear what Singaporeans had to say at the Workers’ Party rally for Tampines GRC. From first-timers to seasoned voters — we captured the mood on 26 April 2025.

#SingaporeGE2025 #WorkersParty #TampinesGRC

Wtf, the thumbnail with the guy holding so many hammers. :s13:
 

Stealth_PL

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Messages
14,722
Reaction score
2,887
There is no star minister that is indispensable.
Even GKY is I don’t think is that spectacular.

If Tharman can step down, no other ministers c-not be vote out.
Exactly.. if the parliament can function when star cabinet member can step down to run for president.. no one else is indispensable.. and that include voucher wong
 

kamsani0

Banned
Joined
Mar 9, 2002
Messages
3,748
Reaction score
1,624
Pritam is getting better over the years.Anything can happen in a freak election and he cld become the 1st minority race PM.

What would be ideal is to have a 50/50 government. First half PAP prime minister run the country. Followed by the opposition.

Then next election rally both sides can claim how one party leadership did over the other.
 

Skoda29

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2016
Messages
31,681
Reaction score
10,746
What would be ideal is to have a 50/50 government. First half PAP prime minister run the country. Followed by the opposition.

Then next election rally both sides can claim how one party leadership did over the other.
Bills cannot passed w/o 2/3 majority.
 

krikering

Master Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2021
Messages
4,668
Reaction score
5,065
What would be ideal is to have a 50/50 government. First half PAP prime minister run the country. Followed by the opposition.

Then next election rally both sides can claim how one party leadership did over the other.
Personally feel that we should just reform our electoral system.
FPTP is really outdated, except for US/SG/UK most of the developed countries around the world is employing PR (with parallel voting)

Adopt Proportional representation and introduce parallel voting.

Then properly separate Municipal duties and lawmaker duties.

Thereafter, completely make civil service non-partisan (like what we see in Nordic Countries/Switzerland/Austria/Nehtlernads/Germany/Japan, etc.)

Last step is to practice separation of power, which allows head-of-states to be able to be impeached by a neutral judge which is non-partisan.

Also we need term limits too (Max 2 terms of 4-5 years each).
 

mynickname

High Supremacy Member
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
30,595
Reaction score
9,269
What would be ideal is to have a 50/50 government. First half PAP prime minister run the country. Followed by the opposition.

Then next election rally both sides can claim how one party leadership did over the other.
Policies take time to have intended effect. You'll encourage gov of the day to ignore long term planning.
 

kamsani0

Banned
Joined
Mar 9, 2002
Messages
3,748
Reaction score
1,624
Policies take time to have intended effect. You'll encourage gov of the day to ignore long term planning.

Yes.

Long term planning happens in the background while people lives their normal lives. We the people do not know what the government is planning to do with immigration, for example, or housing in the next 10-20 years. We let the government work it out and finally when it is ready, new policies will be tabled in parliament for voting to proceed or to shelf.

Even if it means that this process can be tedious and very very painfully slow, at least the people know their MPs will vote for what their constituents want.

Not just pass the resolution, even with so many debates and arguments. In the end, the majority always gets their way.

And the people sulks for 4-5 years before the next election, wanting change.

The vicious cycle repeats.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top