You’ve mischaracterised my point entirely. My words are "Competence demands high pay"; it does not imply a causal relationship between "competency" and "salary". That is to say, not all highly paid individuals are competent. Still, we can be fairly certain that competent individuals will want to be paid well - hence, a lack of high compensation will deter talented people from pursuing government jobs. I'll put it this way: the role of an MP, even at 30K per month, is not worth the time and effort of dealing with the ridiculous and nonsensical mass population.
The incumbent's manifesto highlights their plan of nation-building to ensure generational success. In contrast, the opposition platforms read like populist wish lists—responding to voter sentiment rather than offering real, operationally viable plans. That’s short-sighted governance.
And let's be honest: most voters aren’t equipped to evaluate economic or geopolitical issues meaningfully. Leadership is about foresight, not popularity contests. As Plato aptly noted, “The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.”
And this GE is a joke - we are becoming like Taiwan, Malaysia, and Indonesia. This election feels more like political theatre—mud-slinging over policy substance. We need real leadership—people who can inspire, articulate vision, and execute. Right now, we’re just getting figureheads who happen to be in charge.