fatscaryuncle
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2017
- Messages
- 18,545
- Reaction score
- 5,565
Young families = depending on their bto to be their ticket to private property = pap clean sweep
What contradictions. He is heng swee kiat 2nd. Why suddenly parachute him to punggol? And ah heng also parachute to East coast which help pap maintain their seats in east coast. Same old tactics.Your comments have contradictions. You contradicted yourself.
why dont he just outright say what amenities they will not give punggol if he gets voted out! threatening voters with municipal issues again and then raising cost of living for everyone after getting elected![]()
Free DPM who don’t want
Maybe it was a meme. Can’t find it on googleUrn also used?
Got csb Bo?
NEH, TCH arm chio on the by-lines, sipping red wine and enjoying the show.not only beg like a dog
be exposed as an incompetent MAS chairman by the ntuc insurance saga
be exposed as a heartless former SLF chairman also by the ntuc insurance saga
and now telling lies to cover for his incompetence and heartlessness
pui pui pui to such white shameless incompetent heartless toads
IBs say the f word is no no this GE2025, and I say go ffff spider to gan kim yong
Are you sure GKY will repeat HSK's hairline win?What contradictions. He is heng swee kiat 2nd. Why suddenly parachute him to punggol? And ah heng also parachute to East coast which help pap maintain their seats in east coast. Same old tactics.
The more they say, the more things sounds wrong.what is he talking about???? the overpriced housing shouldnt have been of poor quality in the first place?!?!
first they engineer a problem out of thin air, like how they deprioritized opposition wards for lift upgrades, then they "fix" the problem and claim credit when it should have been done the proper way proper procedure proper vetting from the start?!?!?!?!
really is no blame culture no accountability no transparency![]()
Ok... you are the first to say Alexis dun have looks........ your standard very high.Are you sure GKY will repeat HSK's hairline win?
HSK was up against a woman, whose name I would not mention so as not to be accused of embarrassing the WP. She had a big following all because they voted with their other brain. TPL was cruelly mocked and contrasted with her. Seems like those voters who supported her took the GE for fun, like voting in a Ms Singapore pageant, and were not serious....
GKY is not being challenged by someone with looks who is being followed round and around by dirty minded men. As a Senior Counsel, voters may choose WP because of his credentials plus it helps that he does speak well although not everything he said was reasonable.
Are you sure GKY will repeat HSK's hairline win?
HSK was up against a woman, whose name I would not mention so as not to be accused of embarrassing the WP. She had a big following all because they voted with their other brain. TPL was cruelly mocked and contrasted with her. Seems like those voters who supported her took the GE for fun, like voting in a Ms Singapore pageant, and were not serious....
GKY is not being challenged by someone with looks who is being followed round and around by dirty minded men. As a Senior Counsel, voters may choose WP because of his credentials plus it helps that he does speak well although not everything he said was reasonable.
my bad england, my bad.But he said he will look seriously
POFMA u. It’s pay me first then I look at it seriously. When did I say I will start work?
You see them too upno iron one. all I see is silicon.
软趴趴
Reminds me ofonly can see these minister 低声下气 every 5 years for a short span of 9 days.. enjoy your laughter, irony and the mockery .. the next 5 years he wouldn't hue us peasant when they return to ivory tower
Looks, everybody has. Good looks, bad looks.Ok... you are the first to say Alexis dun have looks........ your standard very high.
Her head big? .... errrhhh sorry....I noticed other big parts.....Looks, everybody has. Good looks, bad looks.
But if Parliament is a beauty pageant, and we are judges, sizing up who should enter Parliament, I want Alexis out. I haven't seen her in real life before, and in fact, I didn't even know she existed till a few days ago. Judging from online pictures, I find that her head is rather big relative to her shoulders and the rest of her body. She seems like a big boned woman, and not quite petite and demure. Don't get me wrong...I am not a fan of HHH.
Looks, everybody has. Good looks, bad looks.
But if Parliament is a beauty pageant, and we are judges, sizing up who should enter Parliament, I want Alexis out. I haven't seen her in real life before, and in fact, I didn't even know she existed till a few days ago. Judging from online pictures, I find that her head is rather big relative to her shoulders and the rest of her body. She seems like a big boned woman, and not quite petite and demure. Don't get me wrong...I am not a fan of HHH.
I am not sure if my observation is accurate enough. It seems to me that PAP MPs usually only keep visiting the same few areas over the years. No matter at my parents' place or my current place, the PAP MPs only visit the blocks in the same few area. Especially my parents' place. For 5 years the MP conducted visits in the neighbouring blocks over and over, just not their block.My family and I stayed at Sun Xueling's ward (Punggol West SMC), and throughout her 5 years here, we never saw her coming to our area for walkabouts. She is only more active at the Sumang side of the SMC. So she is a stranger to us.
We are very glad that WP fielded their strongest team in Punggol and we will all vote for WP. PAP's argument of losing anchor ministers will damage the government is rubbish. Don't tell me none their current cohort of candidates can step up to take over minister rolls if something happens to the anchor minister?
So to say they had no contingency plans to replace leadership in the event something bad happens. This is not acceptable coming from PAP. Shouldn't they field top quality candidates who can all rise up when needed?
Seemed to be they filled many back benchers just to support the current anchor ministers.
Are you sure GKY will repeat HSK's hairline win?
HSK was up against a woman, whose name I would not mention so as not to be accused of embarrassing the WP. She had a big following all because they voted with their other brain. TPL was cruelly mocked and contrasted with her. Seems like those voters who supported her took the GE for fun, like voting in a Ms Singapore pageant, and were not serious....
GKY is not being challenged by someone with looks who is being followed round and around by dirty minded men. As he is a Senior Counsel, voters may choose WP because of his credentials plus it helps that he does speak well although not everything he said was reasonable.