Then move to a progressive tax system scheme like the WP/PSP/SDP has been advocating for all along la.
In the 1st place, taxing essentials makes no sense.
The government should look to implementing wealth tax/estate tax/inheritance tax and luxury goods taxes, etc.
https://newnaratif.com/why-is-the-c...rstanding-the-pap-governments-economic-model/
SG has a very serious inequality issue. The Rich-poor gap is widening at an alarming pace.
They simply are doing their best to avoid taxing the wealthier and billionaires more, which should definitely be done.
UNHWs who come here to park their wealth and Jack up property prices + increase cost of livings, etc. should definitely be taxed more.
They rather get tax revenue from essentials from salt and water, etc. which impact us ordinary citizens (Middle Income/Lower Income) than to implement wealth/estate/inheritance tax/luxury goods, etc. and increase corporate income tax rate.
Unless those businesses are monopoly, once competitions step in price will have to drop. Singapore is a very small market any external f&b or services can gain very fast.Actually if you hear the explanation from Minister from podcast. Actually it does make sense to increase GST.
Remove GST as suggested by some or reduce the rate is not impossible once you increase it however. Because prices won’t come down. Businessman won’t decrease prices because you decrease GST
Actually if you hear the explanation from Minister from podcast. Actually it does make sense to increase GST.
Noting to xia sway lah…hope ncm loses
i wanna see him xia suay in front of victor lye
true, as they are all capitalists, even our own (un)fairpriceRemove GST as suggested by some or reduce the rate is not impossible once you increase it however. Because prices won’t come down. Businessman won’t decrease prices because you decrease GST
Hypothetical ah...imagine if there is no one to speak up on our behalf…. How would the scene play out?
dun think they dare to say anything. they still need to earn a living here.........Just watched the latest Yah Lah But. The two hosts did a balanced discussion on this. Interestingly, the mainstream media featured this issue but I don't recall any on the open letters by Tan Suee Chien on NCM and GKY on the Income Allianz saga. This is of far greater impact if the sale of Income has gone through.
so ncm not chosen one lorNoting to xia sway lah…
Ah lye waited 2 rounds to be placed in a safe area. So is the previous Hougang candidate.
When you are the chosen one… nothing can stop you one.
Just remember the SG Secure tagline. “not if, but when”.
lw doesn't like ncm. it is pinky who likes himNoting to xia sway lah…
Ah lye waited 2 rounds to be placed in a safe area. So is the previous Hougang candidate.
When you are the chosen one… nothing can stop you one.
Just remember the SG Secure tagline. “not if, but when”.
He didn't la... He just thought they should ...how can you ask residents to fk off?!?!
its the same guy. report him for spamming........Thought my browser hang, keeping reading the exact post over and over again no matter how I scrolled down.
Ppl keep saying affect Sporean.....Can someone tell me exactly how it can affect SporeanAgreed. Both made mistakes but let’s be clear:
One made a mistake in a private setting, caused no harm to the public, and immediately came out to apologise when it leaked.
The other made a serious public mistake that could have affected many Singaporeans, stayed silent when it happened, and is only apologising now out of convenience, while still finding excuses and hiding behind his boss to cover for his shortcomings.
At the end of the day, vote for the one who shows sincerity and wants to build a better future for Singaporeans and not someone who has no accountability and needs others to shield him from his own mistakes.
Jalan Kayu resident really need to make a wise decision in this election. I can't vote for them but I'm definitely voting for someone with accountability which is an important trait as a minister.
So what if Allianz the major shareholder? What can happen that is bad to SporeanNCM insisted deal 'made in good faith'.. If so, it means he didn't exercise due diligence when accepting the deal.
Also, social mission is one, there's another big problem with this deal:
https://www.straitstimes.com/business/questions-to-be-answered-in-the-allianz-income-saga
And if the $2.2b deal went through, you know who'll be the major shareholder? Allianz.
Bro not sure if you serious here. Just scroll back 1 page the info is there.Ppl keep saying affect Sporean.....Can someone tell me exactly how it can affect Sporean
Assuming Low become MP.....or assuming all the opposition win .....PAP out.....so since Low beat NCM the 3 star general..... should voter let him become minister of defence...next time go US talk to US defence secretary or go China talk to China general.....then all the SAF general report to Low the ex product manager? Or maybe Pritam Singh the ex Major? opposition keep saying loosing minister level ppl is ok.....then ok lor...if u all think so....if u all think that it Low is the minister of defense....all those mindef ppl ok.....what about Alexis ...she relationship manager....put her in charge of minister of finance ok bo....let her talk to FED chairman? Let all the banks CEO, MAS, etc all listen to her.....u all ok?...why LHL is so insistence to have Ng CM into parliament? LW will want to give Ng a minister post given that he performed so badly with the ntuc allianz saga?