Oh really? So union leaders cannot attend networking functions? When negotiating with towkays must be done in a townhall manner, cannot close door?
How come the those European countries union leaders who attend networking functions with wine and dine and close doors negotiations with those big boss were not asked to step down huh?
Lai, i help u asked ChatGPT riaos
Is it ok for a union leader to meet billionaire business owners behind closed doors?
ChatGPT said:
Meeting with billionaire business owners behind closed doors isn't automatically wrong for a union leader, but it raises serious concerns that depend on how the situation is handled. The key issues are
trust, transparency, and accountability.
When it might be justifiable:
- If the goal is to secure better wages, benefits, or conditions for workers and the meeting is part of a formal negotiation process.
- If confidentiality is necessary for delicate negotiations, but the union leadership is committed to updating members when appropriate.
- If the union leader is acting within a mandate given by members or a bargaining committee.
When it's clearly problematic:
- If the union leader does so without informing members, without oversight, or against their interests.
- If the meeting results in compromises that benefit the employer more than workers—especially if these are kept secret.
- If there's no accountability mechanism to ensure the union leader is acting on behalf of the membership.
Given the power imbalance between a billionaire and a union representing working people, such meetings demand extra scrutiny. Even if they start privately, the
union leader must later explain the purpose, context, and outcome to their members.
Were these meetings for bargaining? Brother Ng got mandate from the union for these bargaining meetings?
Did he publish his purpose, context and outcome of these meetings? Was there any transparency?