Makes more sense. An atas restaurant over any pasta cafe.He prefer invitation for private dining with some one he dunno.
You forgot ?
Definitely not a $3.50 meal from any HC or KPT for sure.
And it is FREE.Makes more sense. An atas restaurant over any pasta cafe.
Canberra is under sembawang grc right? If u noticed a few yrs ago. It's always not d person incharged of tat ministry or who shld answer jump out 1st n make a statement n tried to difuse things.Think he draw too much heat liao so retreat for now, should be someone in Sembawang GRC or Grace Fu (since NEA under her) that will probably make a statement soon.
MIWs paybook usually like that one, will have someone else to replace once the original person kanna arrow to draw attention away, but final conclusive statement probably made by OYK 2-3 weeks later to make it seem like he has resolved the issue or something, etc.
Watch Ur stepAnd it is FREE.
Free stuff are so dangerous.
Oops....
I just kicked some 30k can over.
Got money earn sure got people bid. Maybe just mark up a bit to tank the penalties which is good to make the cost transparent and not hide under some clause in contract.They will not do anything at all.
Do you think the other operators are also performing their social responsibilities for their own HC ?
Who are we kidding here ?
The operators are helping them to manage the HC.
The whole scheme is just some BS to pass the dirty work to them.
If the unit in charge want to be so stern, there will be no one to bid for HC any more.
yep probably why OYK stepped out, technically is under NEA's jurisdiction so should be Grace Fu answer instead.Canberra is under sembawang grc right? If u noticed a few yrs ago. It's always not d person incharged of tat ministry or who shld answer jump out 1st n make a statement n tried to difuse things.
There are terms and conditions to be complied.Got money earn sure got people bid. Maybe just mark up abit.
Then tat social enterprise owner shld come out n answer too. Esp on d cleaning table charge of $650! Just for cleaner to wipe d table n charged $650!?yep probably why OYK stepped out, technically is under NEA's jurisdiction so should be Grace Fu answer instead.
$650 should include return tray right. Since can wack any type of clause why never put return tray as part of the contract. Like this tax payer lose out to pay for half baked management. Should debate if NEA got make good use of our money. Put those weird things in the contract then become so expensive and don’t put return tray.Then tat social enterprise owner shld come out n answer too. Esp on d cleaning table charge of $650! Just for cleaner to wipe d table n charged $650!?
Becos there's a law tat made us d diner do it for them alr. Saved them d trouble.$650 should include return tray right. Since can wack any type of clause why never put return tray as part of the contract.
You want to use your tax money and let you not return tray or to donate free meal?Becos there's a law tat made us d diner do it for them alr. Saved them d trouble.
Use our money build then let operator profit from using the space.You want to use your tax money and let you not return tray or to donate free meal?
Yah loh. So need to scrutinise how they spend our money until need to raise GST.Use our money build then let operator profit from using the space.
I did not manage to see the thread.Then tat social enterprise owner shld come out n answer too. Esp on d cleaning table charge of $650! Just for cleaner to wipe d table n charged $650!?
Basically the contract is not done properly. If NEA got scrutinise the contract between operator and hawkers will have so much drama? Someone did not do their due diligence.I did not manage to see the thread.
Does the cleaning of table include wishing of the dishes and chopstick and spoon or it is charged separately ?
The operator can continue to play punk if it is stated in the agreement.
Unless the cleaning table charge is imposed after the agreement is signed.
Then again, all of the tenants must make noise together.
Or else this is just wasting every one time.
Think it's charged separately if there was a charge for tat. There's alot of other charges n clause which d hawkers must adhere n comply.I did not manage to see the thread.
Does the cleaning of table include wishing of the dishes and chopstick and spoon or it is charged separately ?
The operator can continue to play punk if it is stated in the agreement.
Unless the cleaning table charge is imposed after the agreement is signed.
Then again, all of the tenants must make noise together.
Or else this is just wasting every one time.