[GLGT] Minister Ong Ye Kung Responds to KF Seetoh’s Untrue Claims About Bukit Canberra Hawker Centre

ghregular

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2019
Messages
13,380
Reaction score
5,177
sorry i dont support any hawkers
and dont touch the merdeka card
the rest not interested
 

dambio

Honorary Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
119,446
Reaction score
53,922
Think he draw too much heat liao so retreat for now, should be someone in Sembawang GRC or Grace Fu (since NEA under her) that will probably make a statement soon.

MIWs paybook usually like that one, will have someone else to replace once the original person kanna arrow to draw attention away, but final conclusive statement probably made by OYK 2-3 weeks later to make it seem like he has resolved the issue or something, etc.
Canberra is under sembawang grc right? If u noticed a few yrs ago. It's always not d person incharged of tat ministry or who shld answer jump out 1st n make a statement n tried to difuse things.
 

Nickypigu

Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2019
Messages
5,437
Reaction score
2,548
They will not do anything at all.
Do you think the other operators are also performing their social responsibilities for their own HC ?
Who are we kidding here ?

The operators are helping them to manage the HC.
The whole scheme is just some BS to pass the dirty work to them.
If the unit in charge want to be so stern, there will be no one to bid for HC any more.
Got money earn sure got people bid. Maybe just mark up a bit to tank the penalties which is good to make the cost transparent and not hide under some clause in contract.
 

krikering

Master Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2021
Messages
3,594
Reaction score
3,817
Canberra is under sembawang grc right? If u noticed a few yrs ago. It's always not d person incharged of tat ministry or who shld answer jump out 1st n make a statement n tried to difuse things.
yep probably why OYK stepped out, technically is under NEA's jurisdiction so should be Grace Fu answer instead.
 

Medicated Oil

High Honorary Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
150,247
Reaction score
63,093
Got money earn sure got people bid. Maybe just mark up abit.
There are terms and conditions to be complied.
I dunno what they are.
Assuming that if it include giving out free meals to the community, the authority are not doing a good job in ensuring the operator in adhering to this requirement.

The present operator may not have done enough within the 3 years.
 

dambio

Honorary Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
119,446
Reaction score
53,922
yep probably why OYK stepped out, technically is under NEA's jurisdiction so should be Grace Fu answer instead.
Then tat social enterprise owner shld come out n answer too. Esp on d cleaning table charge of $650! Just for cleaner to wipe d table n charged $650!?
 

Nickypigu

Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2019
Messages
5,437
Reaction score
2,548
Then tat social enterprise owner shld come out n answer too. Esp on d cleaning table charge of $650! Just for cleaner to wipe d table n charged $650!?
$650 should include return tray right. Since can wack any type of clause why never put return tray as part of the contract. Like this tax payer lose out to pay for half baked management. Should debate if NEA got make good use of our money. Put those weird things in the contract then become so expensive and don’t put return tray.
 

dambio

Honorary Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
119,446
Reaction score
53,922
$650 should include return tray right. Since can wack any type of clause why never put return tray as part of the contract.
Becos there's a law tat made us d diner do it for them alr. Saved them d trouble.
 

Medicated Oil

High Honorary Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
150,247
Reaction score
63,093
Then tat social enterprise owner shld come out n answer too. Esp on d cleaning table charge of $650! Just for cleaner to wipe d table n charged $650!?
I did not manage to see the thread.
Does the cleaning of table include wishing of the dishes and chopstick and spoon or it is charged separately ?

The operator can continue to play punk if it is stated in the agreement.
Unless the cleaning table charge is imposed after the agreement is signed.
Then again, all of the tenants must make noise together.
Or else this is just wasting every one time.
 

Nickypigu

Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2019
Messages
5,437
Reaction score
2,548
I did not manage to see the thread.
Does the cleaning of table include wishing of the dishes and chopstick and spoon or it is charged separately ?

The operator can continue to play punk if it is stated in the agreement.
Unless the cleaning table charge is imposed after the agreement is signed.
Then again, all of the tenants must make noise together.
Or else this is just wasting every one time.
Basically the contract is not done properly. If NEA got scrutinise the contract between operator and hawkers will have so much drama? Someone did not do their due diligence.
 

dambio

Honorary Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
119,446
Reaction score
53,922
I did not manage to see the thread.
Does the cleaning of table include wishing of the dishes and chopstick and spoon or it is charged separately ?

The operator can continue to play punk if it is stated in the agreement.
Unless the cleaning table charge is imposed after the agreement is signed.
Then again, all of the tenants must make noise together.
Or else this is just wasting every one time.
Think it's charged separately if there was a charge for tat. There's alot of other charges n clause which d hawkers must adhere n comply.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top