coolhead
Great Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2007
- Messages
- 52,408
- Reaction score
- 13,559
Yes. Gxgx in advance!U read closer.
Does that mean the ex coy will agree to compensate u for 3 years so u won't go competing coy?
Yes. Gxgx in advance!U read closer.
Does that mean the ex coy will agree to compensate u for 3 years so u won't go competing coy?
Close.. but the three year starts after you leave employment.Hello.
I am not a wrok "expert" but I am here to advise you.I am actually just a regular guy trying my best, limbei not lawyer.
This means for 3 years after you (or the applicable party) has left the said company, he/she cannot be employed by any competitor in the same industry as the company with whom you signed this contract with. The 3 year term starts after renumeration terms have been mutually agreed. Or so I believe.
No.. it means they will compensate you, but may not be for full 3 years.. typically it is just a one off payment.Nice initiative appreciate!
Does that mean the ex coy will agree to compensate u for 3 years cos u cant join competing coy?
yea, but the amount is unlilkely to be the same as your last draw salary with them
it is usually lesser. maybe around half
No.. it does not mean compensate you for a duration of 3 years.Yes, as long as you dun go join a competing company
how much is that compensation varies from company, region, local regulations etc
You are not barred from working for non competing business and the compensation package is seldom so generous that it can fully support you for 3 years without employment.Means no work got money for 3 years is Gxgx?
No.. it does not mean compensate you for a duration of 3 years.
No.. it says economic compensation, so it is indeed a compensation.. if it was the other way then they would call it a penalty clause.It does read like that. To me, it also reads as applying in the other direction. That means should you break that clause, you will have to compensate them. But given the vague wording, there's a risk that it could mean a traditional non-competing clause where the former company doesn't compensate you for it but you have to compensate them in the event of a "breach". As with contract matters, it is best to have it explicitly spelt out in black and white for avoidance of doubt.
Anyway, I'm not sure if this is enforceable (ie legal) here in sg regardless of which type it is.
![]()
Yes. I'm amazed that many people can't seem to read and understand contractual terms.You need to agree to compensation beforehand
First sentence is conditional on second sentence
Perhaps you should improve your English at all times
Starting from here?
Haha
Amount to be agreed uponThen is pay a standard fee isit
300k is good
Yes. I'm amazed that many people can't seem to read and understand contractual terms.
what industry do you work in?Then is pay a standard fee isit
300k is good
No. It is about what will stand up in court.Understand text is one thing. It's not difficult.
It's understanding how realistic and viable in practical terms.
Amount to be agreed upon
yeah was too focused on the last bitClose.. but the three year starts after you leave employment.
I cannot contributeYes. I'm amazed that many people can't seem to read and understand contractual terms.