30s-50s chitchat club

lemonzil

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
21,806
Reaction score
1,832
looks like you already suspected her which was why you went to IT

Yeah. Honestly I doubt her. But also for a matter of fact if it’s true, we need to ensure there aren’t any missing emails. As we are expecting returns for some company wide exercise.

I red flag her because she has doesn’t really do her work properly. Even attitude got problem.

I think she’s performing way below expectations.
 

irregardless

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
31,969
Reaction score
32,650
Yeah. Honestly I doubt her. But also for a matter of fact if it’s true, we need to ensure there aren’t any missing emails. As we are expecting returns for some company wide exercise.

I red flag her because she has doesn’t really do her work properly. Even attitude got problem.

I think she’s performing way below expectations.
i guess its time to f*** her!

fire la
 

pepsitwist

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Messages
29,969
Reaction score
9,915
IMG-20251126-WA0001.jpg


Mine was the left... Then downgraded to the right one... Much cheaper

The 50% co-payment is on what ah? $350 on 10k seems quite little for a 50% co-payment?
 

LWZ

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2016
Messages
36,171
Reaction score
13,450
Think forgot to good morning here.

Today my contract staff told me she didn’t receive my email drafted for her to use … I sent last Friday. I asked her to check her entire mailbox. She claim never receive.

I raised a ticket to IT helpdesk for investigation. It’s confirmed sent.
After I show her what IT replied, she told me it’s in her deleted folder.

Tsk tsk.
My team mate also liddat, except he is about to complete his third year liao

He not only miss email, intercontinental flight also can miss, sibei satki menz
 

jeffprobst

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2001
Messages
86,473
Reaction score
12,072
算了。你不相信我

The article talk about 2026-2028 is about the bridging period. MOH leave it to insurer how they wanna bridge to customers
well. up to you then. 😂

While confusing, after few read you understand it. Will just agreed to disagree.
 

jeffprobst

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2001
Messages
86,473
Reaction score
12,072
Yeah. Honestly I doubt her. But also for a matter of fact if it’s true, we need to ensure there aren’t any missing emails. As we are expecting returns for some company wide exercise.

I red flag her because she has doesn’t really do her work properly. Even attitude got problem.

I think she’s performing way below expectations.
Sounds like my senior staff. But did her boss talk to her about her deliverables?
 

jeffprobst

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2001
Messages
86,473
Reaction score
12,072
算了。你不相信我

The article talk about 2026-2028 is about the bridging period. MOH leave it to insurer how they wanna bridge to customers
Just saying, it pretty much sing the same tune as I explained. Existing extra rider policy owner have to wait for their insurer decision on what to do with them. No hard rule to force them into the new rider. MOH leave it to the mercy of the insurer for the aforementioned group of policy owners.

https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...nce-riders-that-confer-absolute-peace-of-mind

“From now until March 31, 2026, the public can still purchase existing rider products, but will have to switch to new riders that meet MOH’s requirements once the policy is due for renewal from April 1, 2028. Sales of these existing products will also cease on April 1, 2026.

As for the approximately two million Singapore residents who have already bought their riders before Nov 26, the seven IP insurers will study whether to adjust the coverage of these existing riders.


This approach by MOH is very similar to how other government agencies always change their policy/stance like playing pressing switching button without thinking the bigger impact, as usual.
 

lemonzil

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
21,806
Reaction score
1,832
Sounds like my senior staff. But did her boss talk to her about her deliverables?

Haven’t yet. The team mate who guides her only started flagging out the issues to me recently. My team mate still say, tahan abit more…. 😵💫

I tasked her with the exercise and I saw many red flags. Some of the most basic things she also can’t deliver.
 

Milo-Dino

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
May 15, 2009
Messages
68,647
Reaction score
27,926
The 50% co-payment is on what ah? $350 on 10k seems quite little for a 50% co-payment?
ok to work it out for you



Using $10k bill example:
- Deductible = $3500 (based on what your policy states)
Remainder after deductible = $6500 (10000-3500)
- Co payment (co-insurance) for the Shield Basic plan (private) is 10%. = $650 (10% of 6500)
So normal circumstances without deductible rider, a person will pay $4150 (3500+650)


Based on GTC P Signature
With the rider for panel doctor:
-payable on deductible is 5% of the original (5% of 3500 = $175)
-then 50% of the co-insurance (50% of 650 = 325)
So end up pay $500 vs $4150

*You can work it out for the $100k bill example... just that the rider introduces a total payable cap of $3000

For the one i downgrade to GTC P Optimum, i'll bare the full deductible and 50% of co-insurance, subject to cap of $6500.... so at least I know if i get something seriously injured or ill, then the bill cap at $6500. (basically this policy is to dissuade claiming for too minor stuff although u can still claim but patient bare more)

And like i mentioned, the Signature will escalate premium if there was a claim. I was told this Optimum wouldn't since policyholder already bearing more risk especially for minor stuff. Anyway I just signed it cosz i got ongoing stuff under investigation. Might downgrade to Govt A next year or later.
 

Milo-Dino

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
May 15, 2009
Messages
68,647
Reaction score
27,926
Just saying, it pretty much sing the same tune as I explained. Existing extra rider policy owner have to wait for their insurer decision on what to do with them. No hard rule to force them into the new rider. MOH leave it to the mercy of the insurer for the aforementioned group of policy owners.

https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...nce-riders-that-confer-absolute-peace-of-mind

“From now until March 31, 2026, the public can still purchase existing rider products, but will have to switch to new riders that meet MOH’s requirements once the policy is due for renewal from April 1, 2028. Sales of these existing products will also cease on April 1, 2026.

As for the approximately two million Singapore residents who have already bought their riders before Nov 26, the seven IP insurers will study whether to adjust the coverage of these existing riders.


This approach by MOH is very similar to how other government agencies always change their policy/stance like playing pressing switching button without thinking the bigger impact, as usual.
yes it's worded like that... but i am telling you from past experience, almost all insurers will shift policyholders to the new normal..... (that because they already incurring heavy losses from overclaims and escalating claims)

like the co-insurance shift in the past, almost all shifted (except prudential which kept those customer on full claims... but that one will see what happen when all these pple age and keep going for medical.. then soon prudential also will buey tahan)
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top