chee Chris
Junior Member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2012
- Messages
- 26
- Reaction score
- 0
Microsoft recently has this "APOC End User Fulfillment Program" instructing you to go down to "hardware returns shop" location 438B Alexandra Road to let them inspect/check your Microsoft hardware before and/or after RMA is accepted and replacement has been done?
Did anyone ever have any experience of the above?
For many years, Microsoft only practiced RMA with free replacement and delivery to your assigned address. But now, Microsoft Support Technical @Kuala Lumpur, Tel: 800 8523543 (Toll Free), declared that delivery cost may have to pay and is no longer free of charge?
I have questioned them thoroughly to show me any Microsoft website or media that stipulated that customers may have to pay delivery cost for RMA replacements and the "APOC End User Fulfillment Program". The Support Technical staff refused to answer and that implied that there was allegation from them!
So it is bias and ambiguous to “selective” customers that Microsoft did not trust their hardware was defective, after RMA was accepted and delivery with free replacement to your address?
A layman will think that if Microsoft wants me to go to 438B Alexandra Road, then Microsoft did not trust that my hardware is defective, and then Microsoft should not have accepted the RMA and delivered the new hardware replacement. Then why Microsoft creates more ordeals thereafter to instruct me to go to 438B Alexandra Road?
Please advice.
Did anyone ever have any experience of the above?
For many years, Microsoft only practiced RMA with free replacement and delivery to your assigned address. But now, Microsoft Support Technical @Kuala Lumpur, Tel: 800 8523543 (Toll Free), declared that delivery cost may have to pay and is no longer free of charge?
I have questioned them thoroughly to show me any Microsoft website or media that stipulated that customers may have to pay delivery cost for RMA replacements and the "APOC End User Fulfillment Program". The Support Technical staff refused to answer and that implied that there was allegation from them!
So it is bias and ambiguous to “selective” customers that Microsoft did not trust their hardware was defective, after RMA was accepted and delivery with free replacement to your address?
A layman will think that if Microsoft wants me to go to 438B Alexandra Road, then Microsoft did not trust that my hardware is defective, and then Microsoft should not have accepted the RMA and delivered the new hardware replacement. Then why Microsoft creates more ordeals thereafter to instruct me to go to 438B Alexandra Road?
Please advice.
Last edited: