My sincerest apology to Yellowfin and the mods here, I am merely trying to highlight to people the risk of unregulated business as someone said that, "Some Singaporean investors will be making good returns from unregulated investments" and "However, by their very nature, if all unregulated alternative investments failed, they would not exist"...
I believed that the above statement is on one hand condemning an unregulated business that failed but at the same time saying that investors make "good returns from unregulated investments" and at the same time saying, "developers who choose the none regulated route which is often far simpler and cheaper, meaning more money (returns) for investors."
I merely highlight the cost to set up a trust fund as asked by the person which proves that the allegation that developers chose not to be regulated due to cost was really unfounded...You can see the edited message and deleted message to see what was edited and why it was edited...
I am saying this more than once here already, if an investment is too good to be true, it really is...MAS have an investor alert list to warn potential investors that a business is unregulated...If you choose to invest in this unregulated business or scheme, you should only blame on your own greed for any losses made...If someone is encouraging you or telling you that unregulated business/scheme makes money for the investors, you take it with a bucket of salt...