Propanone
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- May 30, 2008
- Messages
- 10,352
- Reaction score
- 157
Many people, including doctors, say that air conditioning is effective.
![]()
I respectfully disagree.
Did a test. 9000 btu/hr in a very small room of 2.7m x 3.6m (the new BTO bedrooms, small until kaopeh). SO the aircon FCU : room area ratio is extremely high. ie a lot of aircon fins/surface area for the room volume.
This is the bestest case scenario for aircon to make a difference.
Took nearly 1 hour to drop from 96 ug/m3 -> 72 ug/m3.....and likely not to go below 50 ug/m3 due to external loading. In a severe haze episode, it is likely not to reduce by much due to heavy external loading. And this is among the best case scenario, big aircon, small room. Ratio is good and advantage skewed towards the aircon.
And note : This is probably because the aircon compressor is running and there is condensation water formed on the heat exchanger fins, which aids in trapping the fine smoke particles with the air running over them. No water, no drop in PM2.5 concentration. You see the temperature on the thermo, you know already, it can drop from 30 deg down to 22 deg in 1 hour, it's a small room and big FCU. It cannot gun continuously for 12 hours, 24hrs, or in our recent case 48 hours high concentration (not much use also).....either it gets really cold (it can hit 17 deg C in my small room if external is not hot)or you risk getting the compressor uplorry.
Afte 11.46, ran air purifier for 8 minutes , 72 ug/m3 -> 1 ug/m3
![]()
For comparison, even 3M Filtrete eats it for breakfast. 20 minutes run only (though at lower concentrations)
![]()
![]()
.
Can clean to 3 microgram /m3 is quite amazing...
