3570k overclocking

kingsen

Senior Member
Joined
May 28, 2009
Messages
1,408
Reaction score
31
My 3570K overclocked to 4.4ghz with relatively high temp :( but i'm only using this comp for gaming, so not all the way 100% load, should be ok for 24/7 usage right?

Using offset +0.005 all the way to 4.4ghz and succeeded 2hrs of P95 blend test. Tried 4.5ghz but crash.. but seems like its more on memory fail rather than voltage, because at 4.5ghz, whenever i on my firefox it will crash, my p95/cpu-z/hwinfo also will crash. Tried increasing offset to +0.015 still the same, anyone know how to solve? Currently using all auto setting for ram (1.5v auto).
:s12:



Uploaded with ImageShack.us
 
Last edited:

RIp~Shan

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
280
Reaction score
0
Your temp is how high ?
Just go with 4.4ghz might be due to temp crash to.
 

MacClipper

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
33,617
Reaction score
4
because at 4.5ghz, whenever i on my firefox it will crash, my p95/cpu-z/hwinfo also will crash. Tried increasing offset to +0.015 still the same, anyone know how to solve?

offset to +0.015 - may still be too low

Hint: Easiest is to

1st, use Fixed Vcore to determine what voltage is needed at 4.5GHz, most should do at ~1.25V. Having determined the necessary Vcore then

2nd, adjust using the Offset method to hit the same voltage. My chip needed Offset +0.03V@4.5GHz but since each chip has different VID values, you will need to experiment with the Offset value till it hits the required Vcore

Offset o'cing is not so straightforward for both mobo maker or enduser as previously stated before in my Z77 thread.

HTH
 

kingsen

Senior Member
Joined
May 28, 2009
Messages
1,408
Reaction score
31
But my crash is because of memory or not enuff vcore?
My temp suitable to go 4.5? o.o
 

MGeaR356

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
7,505
Reaction score
59
I will recommend sticking to 4.3ghz at 1.14v.. Seems stable for me... And 72 degrees with Intel burn test
Was running 4.5ghz at 1.245 but just not comfortable with 93 degrees with Intel burn test...
 

kingsen

Senior Member
Joined
May 28, 2009
Messages
1,408
Reaction score
31
Currently using 4.4 as in the picture in my first post, with +0.005V offset value. A foreign fella which I followed his guide to OC commented this on my post.

"Took me quite awhile to figure out why your temps were so high (compared to vcore). You're on Ivy Bridge, not Sandy Bridge!

So first, your temps look fine. Your chip wont even throttle until 105C so at 80C max you're doing great. Remember that in all practice, no game will ever get you max temps. This is why some people even let overclocks go as high as 90C in a stresser.

Second, what you think is a memory issue is really a CPU issue. Looks like you got enough juice to boot, but if you try to put the processor to full running state (ie. opening a program) it can't handle it and it crashes. Although you did try more vcore, you probably didn't do enough. Or it could be a couple of other things.

But for now just leave it at 4.4GHz if you don't want to deal with the extra voltage.

Don't forget a 4.4GHz on an Ivy Bridge is nearly equivalent to 4.6GHz on a Sandy Bridge!! That is quite a feat with no voltage change!"

Ivy is indeed hotter than Sandy. Sexy :o
 

RIp~Shan

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
280
Reaction score
0
Just to get it right overclocking a system, the effect would be 24/7 but would only take place when a program requires it to go that speed.
So its not like changing settings all the time ? Right
 

kingsen

Senior Member
Joined
May 28, 2009
Messages
1,408
Reaction score
31
Just to get it right overclocking a system, the effect would be 24/7 but would only take place when a program requires it to go that speed.
So its not like changing settings all the time ? Right

For dynamic overclocking, yea. There is another Static type of overclocking, where your PC stays at max speed all the way, even during idle / afk.
EG: Using 4.4Ghz to browse facebook? :s13:
 

RIp~Shan

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
280
Reaction score
0
Isn't dynamic overclocking the normal way ?
Static is only if you edit settings to make it that way right ?
 

kashix

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2007
Messages
14,126
Reaction score
3,975
sorry to bump up this thread, but I followed Ts's setting, my vcore hit like 1.28 or something, how is he getting so low vcore? can post full setting or somewhere to start? thanks!
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top