The revision course is out in both school. If u attend lectures, do u think that revision course is useful? and if it is useful, which school is better? Kaplan or SAA? What is the style of the revision? Doing exam qn or just go thru the concept
Some of my contribution, my point of view:
As what my lecturer told us, if you spent another $$$ for revision course so that you can pass the exam. It is worthwhile than to fail and go thru the whole course again which waste more time and $$$.
Some of the style I encounter:
SAA
F6 Revision-- Stephen Chew
1. He will set his own question on company tax, individual tax and some misc question. In one big question, you will apply all your knowledge. It is really helpful to attend his tax revision as it give me the confident to combine and apply the knowledge. He will give you the question for next lesson and you go home and try, next week he will go thru the answer. Exam technique he taught is also very useful, for example, 1.5mins for every marks given instead of using 1.8mins. Some tips like do not go and recalculate the total for company tax if you make some adjustment in between as the total you give will most likely be wrong and don't earn marks even if you recalculate. I will give a thumbs up to attend his revision class.
Kaplan
F7 Revision-- Roy Goh
1. Actually for his class, i feel he covers almost exams question and some theories. His revision class are not so necessary if you pay attention and try the questions he show in class. Unless, you need some motivation to kick start your revision. I would say attending his lesson has cover most of things u need for exams.
Subjects did not attend revision: F9 under lee pei yee-> lesson easy to understand and gives me confident to do my own practice (pass in single attempt.)
Hope that helps, anybody can share the revision style for different lecturer for P1-P3?
I am interested to attend James' P2 Revision but I am afraid his consolidation technique is different from Roy's and his monster style of conducting lessons.
