Hi,
I checked with the bpp distributor for sg, they told me there's no sg variant for the textbooks. Only international or eng.
So what i would like to know is that, for sg variant papers like F4 & F6 which i think may have differences from the int papers. (i suppose different countries have different laws and tax)
Is it alright to use the international study texts for the subjects?
Is there any ways to learn about the differences between sg variant and int?
Many Thanks
I saw this and thought I would give a summary of issues:
Singapore has a lot of variant papers. On most, the differences between Singapore syllabus and International syllabus are almost zero. Auditing standards are virtually the same, as are accounting standards. There are small detail differences in corporate governance and ethics, but nothing major.
As such, using International Stream books is not a problem on ACCA.
BUT...
F4, F6 and P6 are a different issue. Law and tax are set by governments, not international standard setters - so of course they are different from country to country.
If you intend sitting Singapore tax and law, you will need Singapore stream books.
BPP are the now the only Platinum books provider of ACCA, and they are not writing any Singapore stream books (and have told me they have no plans to write them at present).
Kaplan are the next level down with Gold publishing accreditation. Kaplan does do F4 and F6 books for Singapore variant, and a P6 book of questions and answers (but no P6 text book - they sell a CCH tax manual instead, which was not written for students so is not totally linked to the P6 syllabus).
LSBF are opening in Singapore as we speak, and will have Singapore variant law and tax books (they are publishers, like BPP and Kaplan, as well as tutors) some time soon.
One final point - Singapore law has a lot of English law as its basis. If you studied from an English law book, you are reading the wrong book ... but some of what you read would be of use. It is tax which is the biggest issue for differences.
On other papers, no great problem. For example, on P1 the examiner is not bothered about detailed content of different governance codes. it is the principle that matters. So, for example, the principle of a board of directors having a strong independent NED voice is important to be able to explain - in the UK it is at east half the board, in Singapore at least a third - but the principle is the same in both countries.
I hope this helps!
Paul