after dabbling a little while with AI ...

[MizunoVolley]

Isn't that the intention ?
The system already devised the 10 years series model answer for you.
Whether it is right or wrong, without the actual past experience and knowledge, you will just execute blindly.
Just like Google search.
Is it neutral ?

if everything correct okay loh. if not then no one knows what is happening lol

 

[Medicated Oil]

if everything correct okay loh. if not then no one knows what is happening lol

It just strike me one day that we are being "programmed" from all the responses from AI.
And whether it is "correct" or not, it is defined by the SYSTEM.
Just like the newspaper that we are reading everyday.

 

[DragonFire]

I realised you can't replace and will still need to acquire the basic to advanced domain knowledge in the area of your interest ... without the basic and/or advance knowledge, you may just shoot yourself in the foot by amplifying hidden mistakes later on ... AI just makes it faster but it should not replace the necessity of acquiring the knowledge ...

Publicly accessible general AI is very prone to hallucinations. Closed source AIs trained by specialists and offered on subscription basis tho are far less prone. While they are still not fully autonomous, they absolutely have potential as far as acquiring advanced knowledge is concerned.

The main industry issue now is that companies are not seeing farther than the tips of their noses, and are effectively turning off the means for young knowledge workers to acquire knowledge and fill the overseer roles of their seniors when those seniors eventually move on.

It is a GG state in so many fields.

 

[davidktw]

this is correct and I agree ... this is especially true to those who think Vibe Coding can really replace a well-trained programmer or software developer ... we should all go back to the basic after all the hyping of what AI can replace us of ...

@davidktw

I see that there are some areas which are successful, some areas which are not.

My only ponder is

A) What makes the AI perceived as good now?
B) What makes sure AI will be good in the future?
C) A more literal question for Human. How are you going to solve an integration or differentiation mathematical problem if you don’t even knows how to do simple addition and subtraction? Thus what makes you be able to provide the training material for the next wave of AI for problems that have not exist and probably the solution doesn’t exist at all?

We are guaranteed in anyway that when humans keep using AI would pave the humans for better learning in the future?

Do you even know how to Count? Don’t underestimate the meaning of Counting, especially for one whom doesn’t know what Discrete Mathematics means.

 

[cosmothecat]

AI tends to CSB

things that they don’t know they will just guess and invent something fictional and tell you the false answers as fact