Yes I agreed.
The world has more than just AX40 albeit it is quite readily available from qoo10.
Based on the figure assuming 99.9% efficiency cadr is 180m3/h at max speed which is pretty decent.
But at such low wattage, I dare to say that the air outlet speed is low and too low to prevent short circuit. Ap must also be powerful enough to circulate the clean air around the room.
wtf...if never remove bag and the AP keep throwing out air, never get choke?![]()
AX40 quality must be there 
Based on the figure assuming 99.9% efficiency cadr is 180m3/h at max speed which is pretty decent.
But at such low wattage, I dare to say that the air outlet speed is low and too low to prevent short circuit. Ap must also be powerful enough to circulate the clean air around the room.
Actually how many input were not so important than human healthy.
Get lesser sick you are easily earn back from the medical fee.
Just few watts only if compare to AC just like a peanut wow
Maybe I am wrong
The idea for this ap is allow user switch on 247.
The e2f filter is also same as that puny 'amazing air purifier' at qoo10 which state that its washable. But clair only state vacc and need for replacment by 18th month.
I would probably use this at office desk or as hepa ap compliment and put bedside.
Low electricity consumption is good for environment
Hepa will still dominate market...it was afterall developed to filter air in nuclear facility
I still dont see the use when the air circulation is bad. Only the localised near the ap will be clean.
In a house with Windows closed, clean air circulation is very poor.
My pm counters do not come with a fan, and they will under report pm count until I shake it or blow air to bring surrounding air.
You will need a fan to assist the AP as Wrx said before, a medium sized fan uses 25-30 W so it defeat the purpose.


Happened in my office until i opened up to check.
so end up the ap just an air circulatorYup which is y i may consider for office desk space. With USB fan and surround with plants. Office no need too good an ap but i wanna use free electricity and not buy replacement filter for office ap![]()
hahaha ya that I agree
I also looking for one in office, desk type one, don't want to spend to buy a big one, that one is for boss to buy.
But I measure the air quality in my office, normalised to nea is only 15u/m3, cleaner than my house with ap on so it's not too bad.
40W AP running 24/7/365
Running cost $81 excluding filters.
Assumption TB filters $40 and ap last 10 years
Life cycle cost 10 years x ($81 + 2 x $40) = $1610
Half cost of running is electricity.
I am particular cos maybe I am poor.
Is the same TB seller that I PM to you?Its the same tb seller which alot here custom their hepa for AX40
I was quite interested in go-clair. I suspect it doesn't have large enough airflow since it's so small, but it will be interesting if you can post some data.
Just saying "tested and not recommend" doesn't help.
Since it uses way lesser energy, like 5W for their flagship model on max speed, plus a 35db, the trade off is exactly that. The best way to test it will be to enclose it inside a room for 24 hours and test it against whichever model you have that's HEPA.
Off the top of my head, since its 5W, it's ideal to run it 24x7, and keep the door closed most of the time to keep optimum. Compared to larger airflow HEPA, it has to be switched on high everytime you are in the room, and ideally 8 to 12 hours.
5W x 24 hours = 120W
35W x 8 hours = 280W
Which is why i also do not agree with the "it doesn't work" comments without data.

Is the same TB seller that I PM to you?
Anyways why don't you ask the companies who produce this thing for numbers rather than myself...
But personally I would avoid using them for our Haze related issue.
You are right though, I did PM them on FB and here's what they say :
The e2F filter is a new patented technology, so you will not see any other competitors with the e2F filter. In terms of "scientific review", the best we can do is show the results of our 0.3 um and 0.1 um tests:
cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0640/4627/files/0.3um_Test_report_air_cleaning_capacity.pdf
cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0640/4627/files/0.1um_Test_report_air_cleaning_capacity.pdf
We do not provide a CADR rating because we do not agree with that rating system. The CADR is flawed in the sense that the way the test is designed inherently favors air purifiers that can push out a large amount of air over air purifiers that can clean the air more efficiently, but with the result of less air volume pushed out by the unit. Our air purifiers put efficiency above all else.
To be frank, almost any manufacturer can get "certified" with the CADR rating as long as they pay the annual fees to the AHAM (Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers). There are other reputable air purifier manufacturers who have taken a similar stance as us and do not provide a CADR.
While we do not have a comparison video (I am not a lawyer, but that could be a bit risky, legally speaking), we do provide a comparison chart, so you can see all the specifications of other air purifiers side by side.
go-clair.com/pages/air-purifier-review
You are right though, I did PM them on FB and here's what they say :
The e2F filter is a new patented technology, so you will not see any other competitors with the e2F filter. In terms of "scientific review", the best we can do is show the results of our 0.3 um and 0.1 um tests:
cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0640/4627/files/0.3um_Test_report_air_cleaning_capacity.pdf
cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0640/4627/files/0.1um_Test_report_air_cleaning_capacity.pdf
