AMD ThreadRipper. Are you READY?

CrispyPeddler

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2016
Messages
1,829
Reaction score
7
can anyone explain the benefit over the normal cpu? like is it faster? cooler? or benefit in any programme?
 

Koenig168

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
10,038
Reaction score
1,748
can anyone explain the benefit over the normal cpu? like is it faster? cooler? or benefit in any programme?

You will need to wait for benchies for the answer.

Generally, Threadripper has 12 or 16 cores which would benefit productivity programs which can make use of the cores. For gaming, no point.
 

Rashkae

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2004
Messages
22,372
Reaction score
80
can anyone explain the benefit over the normal cpu? like is it faster? cooler? or benefit in any programme?

It's targeted at workstations. So if you run a lot of VMs, do rendering, intense multi-core workloads, it will be fantastic.
 

Kairos

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2009
Messages
2,252
Reaction score
63
AMD TR. Are you ready?

Yes, we are. :D

main.jpg


Source: Gigabyte SG - AMD Socket TR4
 

killer

Master Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2000
Messages
3,852
Reaction score
0
I hope this launch will be better than what we had for ryzen7, but looking at it so far, it doesn't seem like the cooling solution availability will be able to match the demand. Sure, the brackets will help up, but I don't think most people wanting it wants to use a stop gap solution
 

CrispyPeddler

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2016
Messages
1,829
Reaction score
7
You will need to wait for benchies for the answer.

Generally, Threadripper has 12 or 16 cores which would benefit productivity programs which can make use of the cores. For gaming, no point.

It's targeted at workstations. So if you run a lot of VMs, do rendering, intense multi-core workloads, it will be fantastic.

First and foremost is bragging right la..other than that buy Pentium G4560 for gaming.

thanks! so there is no increase in gaming experience at all? or just not worth for price/performance wise for gaming
 

royfrosty

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
27,727
Reaction score
1,553
This type of cpu is not for everyone. More for people whom wanna use for VM, their own workstation etc. To use it for gaming is pointless, games usually cant even use that many cores.

Or if you are an enthusiast then yes, spending top dollars for it is nothing.
 

shadey

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2009
Messages
6,780
Reaction score
721
thanks! so there is no increase in gaming experience at all? or just not worth for price/performance wise for gaming

No it's not for gaming

You could host a fantastic gaming *server* or use it to compile games.

This is a workstation CPU
 

mr_voodoo

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2006
Messages
12,094
Reaction score
0
Time to say goodbye to my x99 which has served me well for nearly 3 years :s12:

but the thought of redo-ing my loop :(:s13:
 

haylui

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
29,769
Reaction score
91
Things really turn quickly. Previously cannot find AMD CPU in SLS now it's like every shop wanting to sell them...
 

royfrosty

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
27,727
Reaction score
1,553
Time to say goodbye to my x99 which has served me well for nearly 3 years :s12:

but the thought of redo-ing my loop :(:s13:

Just do it! Lol.

Im still thinking whether should i go for TR or just use AM4. The only reason i would buy TR would be the 8 slots of rams and 64 pcie lanes given on every processor. Unlike intel giving limited pcie lanes when buying such an expensive cpu.

Another thing to consider, TR definitely not so fast to find waterblocks.

Decisions decisions decisions.....
 

m0n0n0ke

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2003
Messages
24,251
Reaction score
3,362
Just do it! Lol.

Im still thinking whether should i go for TR or just use AM4. The only reason i would buy TR would be the 8 slots of rams and 64 pcie lanes given on every processor. Unlike intel giving limited pcie lanes when buying such an expensive cpu.

Another thing to consider, TR definitely not so fast to find waterblocks.

Decisions decisions decisions.....

Of course tr. Cooler on their way already.
 

tarui04

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
64,409
Reaction score
1,770
Just do it! Lol.

Im still thinking whether should i go for TR or just use AM4. The only reason i would buy TR would be the 8 slots of rams and 64 pcie lanes given on every processor. Unlike intel giving limited pcie lanes when buying such an expensive cpu.

Another thing to consider, TR definitely not so fast to find waterblocks.

Decisions decisions decisions.....


cheapest is 1.8k+

:eek::eek:
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top