gld998
High Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2008
- Messages
- 38,411
- Reaction score
- 2,330
So it starts with Zen.
Then Ryzen.
And now Fryzen?![]()


can extend my stove lifespan aSo it starts with Zen.
Then Ryzen.
And now Fryzen?![]()


can extend my stove lifespan aQuestion: Use for what?
please enlighten me...how does USD 799 and 999 consider cheap?![]()
There is literally no reason I'd need 16 cores, but I still think I'd feel like a badass sitting there with like 15 cores idle.
Intel's flagship offering to compete with threadripper is at USD$2K!
For 50% of the price, you get a much better processor without all the stupid gunk poop under the IHS. Not to mention faster overall and some reports claim that the threadripper edges ahead in single core but loses marginally on multi-core.
Debauer remarked that all the X299 boards currently have severe VRM and cable overheating issues when overclocked. Looks like Intel rushed the platform to counter AMD but it looks like the X299 is dead in the water. Incapable of competing on price/performance and temps still are an issue because they are stubborn to use **** gunk under the IHS. While it may not be the worst for them, sets to look they are gonna relive the Prescott vs Athlon FX days with AMD taking the lead this time around.
A mainstream platform Coffee Lake should be a better platform if you not going to HEDT.
I am sure they are still optimising but if single core performance is THAT good, it could be a godsend for gamers upgrading their rigs. Factually, most games still depend heavily on single core performance.
You can also take that 16 cores and rub it into my face because I only have 8 cores Ryzen chip
Haha. But that 16 Cores is going to be a monster for VM and Photo/Video work loads! I'm already very happy with Ryzen 7s for such stuff.
Recent games are going multi-core (look at Battlefield 1 or upcoming Battlefront II). Soon, mult-threaded games will become the norm as PS4 and XBOX One depends on up to 8 cores processors.
But you're right, Intel dropped the ball by not soldering the IHS like AMD does for their HEDT chips... Come on, already paying a premium for such a high core-count chip, and get mediocre heat transfer because of crap paste they use under IHS. Such a disappointment.
please enlighten me...how does USD 799 and 999 consider cheap?![]()
Can create own private network infrastructure liao with all the security appliancesYou can also take that 16 cores and rub it into my face because I only have 8 cores Ryzen chip
Haha. But that 16 Cores is going to be a monster for VM and Photo/Video work loads! I'm already very happy with Ryzen 7s for such stuff.
Recent games are going multi-core (look at Battlefield 1 or upcoming Battlefront II). Soon, mult-threaded games will become the norm as PS4 and XBOX One depends on up to 8 cores processors.
But you're right, Intel dropped the ball by not soldering the IHS like AMD does for their HEDT chips... Come on, already paying a premium for such a high core-count chip, and get mediocre heat transfer because of crap paste they use under IHS. Such a disappointment.
Intel's flagship offering to compete with threadripper is at USD$2K!
For 50% of the price, you get a much better processor without all the stupid gunk poop under the IHS. Not to mention faster overall and some reports claim that the threadripper edges ahead in single core but loses marginally on multi-core.
Debauer remarked that all the X299 boards currently have severe VRM and cable overheating issues when overclocked. Looks like Intel rushed the platform to counter AMD but it looks like the X299 is dead in the water. Incapable of competing on price/performance and temps still are an issue because they are stubborn to use **** gunk under the IHS. While it may not be the worst for them, sets to look they are gonna relive the Prescott vs Athlon FX days with AMD taking the lead this time around.
A mainstream platform Coffee Lake should be a better platform if you not going to HEDT.
I am sure they are still optimising but if single core performance is THAT good, it could be a godsend for gamers upgrading their rigs. Factually, most games still depend heavily on single core performance.
Price for 7900x is 999 I think. But I do agree the tim they used is damn Chui and their vrm for x299 is gg.
i9-7900X is not the flagship. This is 10C/20T.
mmh got link? I thought currently x299 flagship is the 7900x at the moment. Unless you talking about coffeelake that is not launched yet.
Where are the coolers? Nothing fits currently.
From Anandtech. The 7900X is actually smack in the middle.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/11542/intel-announces-x299-skylakex-and-kaby-lakex-time-line-preorders-and-availability