CNA - Law passed to keep CareShield Life premiums sustainable; MPs debate affordability, fairness of insurance scheme

wutawa

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2003
Messages
11,714
Reaction score
3,407
1. careshield life is compulsory for those born in 1980 and after, starting from 30 yo, a lot of ppl not covered.
2. the premium is deducted from ma annually. those defaulters dont have enough in their ma, likely unemployed or self-employed.
to make a big move to ensure the "few" defaulters pay up = big money over time
 

yperic

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
82,549
Reaction score
30,451

Law passed to keep CareShield Life premiums sustainable; MPs debate affordability, fairness of insurance scheme​

Amendments to the law include the reinstatement of a planned underwriting criteria and expanded avenues for the authorities to serve notices to defaulters of CareShield Life premiums.

Law passed to keep CareShield Life premiums sustainable; MPs debate affordability, fairness of insurance scheme

An elderly woman on a wheelchair. (Photo: iStock)

SINGAPORE: Members of Parliament (MPs) passed a new law on Wednesday (Oct 15) allowing authorities to serve notices to defaulters of CareShield Life premiums, among other moves to keep premiums sustainable and affordable for those enrolled in the national disability insurance scheme.

Tabling the CareShield Life and Long-Term Care (Amendment) Bill for a second reading, Senior Minister of State for Health Koh Poh Koon said that while no one will lose coverage due to an inability to pay premiums, premium recovery is key to ensuring the sustainability of the insurance scheme and fairness to all policyholders.

“Like any other insurance scheme, CareShield Life relies on collective responsibility through risk-pooling within each cohort … As part of this collective responsibility, all policyholders must play their part by meeting their premium obligations,” he told the House.

Launched in 2020, CareShield Life provides monthly payouts for individuals with severe disabilities, defined as the inability to perform at least three out of six daily living activities, such as washing, feeding or dressing.

The national disability insurance scheme is compulsory for those born in 1980 or later, while older cohorts have the option to enrol.

The Bill also sought to reinstate the scheme’s underwriting criterion, which will lower premiums for older optional cohort policyholders.

A total of 14 MPs spoke in support of the Bill, while also raising various concerns about the amendments and other issues related to CareShield Life, such as its affordability and whether the insurance payouts are adequate for those with disabilities.

WHAT THE BILL IS ABOUT​

On the need to enhance premium recovery processes, Dr Koh cited how there are individuals “who can afford to, but wilfully decide not to pay their premiums despite repeated reminders”.

Premium defaults affect the scheme’s financial sustainability and in turn, the ability to meet claims. Consequently, such unrecovered premiums are shouldered by other policyholders within their cohorts in the form of higher premiums.

Currently, demand notes, which are formal notices served to defaulters, can be served through channels such as registered mail, but “operational challenges” emerge when policyholders fail to update their addresses or reside overseas, said Dr Koh.

The amendments would allow demand notes to be served via additional ways, such as digital means. This is similar to measures in place for recovery of MediShield Life premiums, and will streamline premium recovery actions, said Dr Koh.

Another change under the Bill is the reinstatement of an underwriting criteria for older individuals whose participation in CareShield Life is optional.

“Once insurance take-up is optional, underwriting is important. This is to guard against adverse selection, where those who are more likely to claim will be more likely to enrol, driving up claims,” Dr Koh said.

“Therefore, when the scheme was first conceptualised, it was designed such that only optional cohort individuals without any pre-existing disability could enrol in the scheme.”

But to ensure inclusivity, the Ministry of Health (MOH) granted a time-limited concession allowing older individuals to enrol in the scheme, even if they have milder forms of disability.

As of June, about 900,000, or almost half of the older optional cohort, have done so. Sign-up rates have dwindled over the grace period of four years - almost 90 per cent lower than when the scheme was first launched. This suggests that most older individuals who wanted to enrol in CareShield Life have already done so, said Dr Koh.

The Bill hence proposed reinstating the planned underwriting criteria for the optional cohort from Jan 1, 2026, alongside a new definition of “not disabled” as being able to perform all six activities of daily living without assistance.

This means that those from the optional cohort who have mild disabilities will no longer be able to enrol in CareShield Life.

Dr Koh said this change in underwriting criteria will moderate premiums for older policyholders, as the earlier concessions meant that premiums had to be set higher to account for the possibility that those with mild to moderate disabilities might be more likely to join CareShield Life.

For example, the annual premium for a policyholder born in 1952 will be lowered by more than S$100 (US$77.19) in 2026.

The change in underwriting criteria from January also applies to new citizens and permanent residents, meaning those who fulfil the “not disabled” definition will be eligible for CareShield Life.

WHY IT MATTERS​

The passing of the law comes less than two months after changes to the scheme were announced in August.

The scheme had not been reviewed since its launch, and changes were recommended by an independent CareShield Life Council.

From 2026 to 2030, those enrolled in the scheme will see their premiums increase by an average of S$38 and up to S$75 annually.

The annual growth rate of CareShield Life payouts will be doubled from 2 per cent to 4 per cent, with the same eligibility criteria for claims.

“These increased payouts will better cushion against rising long-term care costs, driven by inflation of manpower and technology costs,” Dr Koh said.

With the new growth rate, a policyholder making a claim in 2030 will receive S$806 per month, compared to the S$731 per month under the previous annual growth rate. This is an increase of S$900 annually.

Under the revised scheme, the government has also committed to providing over $570 million in additional support over the next five years to help policyholders cope with the premium adjustments.

Of this sum, S$440 million will be used to moderate the premium increases for all affected policyholders, while the remaining S$130 million will be used to offer more support to low- to middle-income policyholders.

“Without this support, premiums in 2026 would have increased by approximately S$126 on average, with a 4 per cent per annum increase thereafter,” Dr Koh said.

The enhanced payouts and premiums will apply from 2026 to 2030 and will be reviewed after that, MOH previously noted.
 

yperic

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
82,549
Reaction score
30,451

WIDE RANGE OF ISSUES​

While MPs on both sides of the House supported the Bill, they also raised concerns about a wide range of issues, including the affordability of the premiums, the scheme’s inclusivity and whether insurance payouts would be adequate.

Several also delved into Careshield Life premiums paid by women, who typically live longer and thus are more likely to develop severe disability.

On premium affordability, MP Mariam Jaafar (PAP-Sembawang) noted that the increase in premiums could be a strain for lower to middle-income families supporting multiple dependents, and those with low MediSave balances such as retirees and the self-employed.

Similarly, MP Jessica Tan (PAP-East Coast) raised concerns about the affordability of long-term care for those who do not qualify for subsidy support, particularly retirees.

“These are often individuals who own modest assets but have limited cash flow, they fall just outside the means-tested thresholds, are caregivers for spouses or ageing parents, while managing their own health.”

MP Yeo Wan Ling (PAP-Pasir Ris-Punggol) and MP He Ting Ru (WP-Sengkang) spoke about the higher health and long-term care insurance premiums that women pay compared to men.

“Women pay higher premiums, and this is still the case, with the reasoning that women live longer and claim more,” Ms He said, asking if the assumptions that women would claim more and for longer have been borne out.

Ms He asked for more to be done to explore how the gender gap can be closed, citing that the longevity gap between men and women has narrowed over the last two decades. She suggested the possibility of a review of gender-based premiums.

On payouts, Ms Jaafar highlighted that the 4 per cent payout increase may not keep pace with actual long-term care cost inflation.

“And since the payout is also fixed at the point of claim or at age 67, their value may erode over time,” she said.

She asked if the government would consider regular affordability reviews to monitor premiums, subsidies, payouts and inflation, and recalibrate quickly as needed.

Responding to MPs’ concerns about affordability, Dr Koh gave assurances that no one will lose CareShield Life coverage due to an inability to afford premiums.

He added that lower and middle-income policyholders will see even smaller premium increases, as they will enjoy further subsidies.

On questions on premium affordability for women, Dr Koh said gender is a “relevant factor” for CareShield Life as the key parameters that affect long-term care insurance claims, such as lifespan, duration and likelihood of disability, vary between men and women.

He added that women tend to live longer than men and are likely to develop severe disability, and are therefore more likely to stay in disability for a longer period.

“It will mean that in the event of severe disability, a woman will typically receive CareShield Life payouts for a longer duration.”

MPs also raised concerns about the underwriting criteria change and the impact on those excluded, such as older individuals from the optional cohort with mild disability.

MP Jamus Lim (WP-Sengkang) said while he understood the economic rationale of excluding those severely disabled, there remains a “moral responsibility” to take care of them.

In his response, Dr Koh noted that the optional cohort had been given a four-year concession period, with about 900,000 individuals, or about half of the optional cohort, enrolling in CareShield Life as of June.

Including those who chose to remain on ElderShield, about seven in 10 older Singaporeans are enrolled in national long-term care insurance schemes, he said.

ElderShield is an earlier version of the national insurance scheme against severe disability, and has since been replaced by CareShield Life.

Dr Koh said different layers of financial support, such as subsidies and grants, which have been “significantly enhanced recently”, are available for those who have chosen not to enrol in CareShield Life.

Source: CNA/cj(mi)

 

yperic

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
82,549
Reaction score
30,451


Higher premiums for women under CareShield Life are about fairness, rather than discrimination, says Senior Minister of State for Health Koh Poh Koon. He was responding to Ms He Ting Ru’s (Sengkang GRC) earlier concern that asking women to pay more for CareShield Life risks deepening structural inequities.

Chapters:
00:00 He Ting Ru on CareShield Life legislation
01:14 Adequacy of payouts and monitoring long-term care costs
03:16 Gender-differentiated premiums
07:25 Ms He proposes transparency & mandatory reviews
11:44 Need for Holistic Caregiver Support
14:43 Koh Poh Koon’s response
 

fandango

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2003
Messages
66,172
Reaction score
21,594
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/sin...ms-sustainable-affordability-fairness-5404121

if i dun wanna pay, why force me on the system? why must i pay for lazy bums of the society? each is to be accountable for their health what....

“Like any other insurance scheme, CareShield Life relies on collective responsibility through risk-pooling within each cohort … As part of this collective responsibility, all policyholders must play their part by meeting their premium obligations,” he told the House.
CPF really lost its ways already
 

highsulphur

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2011
Messages
74,985
Reaction score
38,271
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/sin...ms-sustainable-affordability-fairness-5404121

if i dun wanna pay, why force me on the system? why must i pay for lazy bums of the society? each is to be accountable for their health what....

“Like any other insurance scheme, CareShield Life relies on collective responsibility through risk-pooling within each cohort … As part of this collective responsibility, all policyholders must play their part by meeting their premium obligations,” he told the House.
The scheme only works if there's a sufficient big pool of victims, oops I mean customers
 

FT PRIDE

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2013
Messages
15,849
Reaction score
938
Agree. Govt should just remove careshield life completely. It’s totally unnecessary expenditure
It is necessary. The payout, though not alot, but still come in handy when you really need it. There are still many who are not well off which is why there are defaulter
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top