4. Ministries Operating in Silos: A Failure of Leadership
One of the most glaring weaknesses in the current PAP government is the lack of effective communication and collaboration between ministries. Ministers are not just administrators; they are supposed to be leaders who bridge gaps between civil servants, align policies across departments, and ensure the machinery of government works cohesively. Instead, what we see today are ministries operating in silos, with little incentive to coordinate.
The responsibility for this lies with ministers who either lack the will or the skill to foster collaboration. A minister’s role is not just to manage their own portfolio but to actively engage with counterparts to resolve overlaps and conflicts. If the PAP cannot ensure its ministers rise to this challenge, it raises questions about their fitness to lead a complex, modern Singapore.
5. The Green Plan 2030: Noble Goals, Questionable Pragmatism
Singapore’s Green Plan 2030 sets ambitious targets to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, aligning with global climate agreements. While environmental stewardship is vital, the PAP’s approach risks imposing
disproportionate financial burdens on households and businesses while offering negligible global impact.
Costs Passed to Consumers
The Green Plan’s initiatives—from expanding solar infrastructure to phasing out internal combustion engines—require massive public and private investment. These costs will inevitably trickle down to consumers through higher utility bills, COE premiums, and increased prices for goods and services. For example, the push for green energy imports (like undersea cables from ASEAN nations) or hydrogen adoption could raise electricity tariffs by 20–30% over the next decade, disproportionately affecting all households.
While the PAP frames this as a “shared sacrifice,” it has not provided transparent cost-benefit analyses to justify the scale of spending. Why should Singaporeans bear such steep costs when the nation contributes just
0.1% of global emissions?
The Nuclear Red Herring
Worse, the Green Plan’s targets may force Singapore to prematurely adopt risky technologies like nuclear energy. Despite the government’s cautious stance, its a dangerous gamble for a densely populated city-state with no hinterland for error. A single incident could devastate Singapore’s reputation and security.
Rather than blindly following global trends, Singapore should prioritize
practical, scalable solutions tailored to its unique constraints. For instance:
- Focusing on climate adaptation (e.g., coastal protection) rather than symbolic net-zero pledges.
- Incentivizing industrial efficiency over sweeping mandates that strain SMEs.
The PAP’s rigid adherence to performative climate goals—without addressing affordability or feasibility—reflects a pattern of top-down policymaking that prioritizes international accolades over household realities.