CPF Account Value Thread 2025

DevilPlate

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2020
Messages
11,838
Reaction score
5,031
You have been saying the CPF 4% may not be sustainable ... how aging population will affect the rate?

SA started from Jul 1977 at 5.07% and rose to 5.79% and then settled at 4% (OA at 2.5%) ever since the third quarter of 1999 to date. I would think it can carry on at those rates, unless interest rate goes negative and GIC failed over a sustained period of time.
Because we will have lesser younger cohort to contribute to CPF system and more and more boomers start to withdraw from the system. As explained by that guy YT video which u claim u watch and learnt nth.

CPFL payout can be reduced which u agreed previously.

We can always agree to disagree.

Anyway u say that OCBC annuity cui cmi but i think there are some scenerios where it can be “better” since beneficiaries can get slightly more than the premiums paid upon death.

Need experts to run excel table….or maybe ChatGpt can help whahaha
 

henrylbh

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
16,097
Reaction score
829
I bring your comments here for cpf discussion:giggle:
My fren was happy to make a full VHR a few years before reaching age 55. Not only that she dumped 100k into the son's CPF accounts. And now she needs those money for the spouse's and MIL medical expenses.
 

henrylbh

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
16,097
Reaction score
829
Because we will have lesser younger cohort to contribute to CPF system and more and more boomers start to withdraw from the system. As explained by that guy YT video which u claim u watch and learnt nth.

CPFL payout can be reduced which u agreed previously.

We can always agree to disagree.

Anyway u say that OCBC annuity cui cmi but i think there are some scenerios where it can be “better” since beneficiaries can get slightly more than the premiums paid upon death.

Need experts to run excel table….or maybe ChatGpt can help whahaha
I see that the vdo didn't help you to understand and you mixed sustainable payouts with the viablility of 4% interest rate. Each cohort draws from its own pool so earlier cohorts do not depend on later cohort contributions unless it a ponzi scheme :D

The OCBC annuity scheme can only appeal to those who have little knowledge of finance and calculations.

Learned nothing is not as bad as learned the wrong thing :D
 
Last edited:

DevilPlate

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2020
Messages
11,838
Reaction score
5,031
I see that the vdo didn't help you to understand and you mixed sustainable payouts with the viablility 4% interest rate. Each cohort draws from its own pool so earlier cohorts do not depend on later cohort contributions unless it a ponzi scheme :D

The OCBC annuity scheme can only appeal to those who have little knowledge of finance and calculations.
It is a legit ponzi scheme!

Thats why u given No choice to opt for RSS else CPFL will not be sustainable when many opt out and go for RSS

*I never run the figures only agar agar think that OCBC annuities may benefit those people who js nice die at a certain age whereby beneficiaries (under CPFL) get nth. Ofc also need to make assumptions about the returns since their payout is non guaranteed up to 3.x%
 
Last edited:

henrylbh

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
16,097
Reaction score
829
It is a legit ponzi scheme!

Thats why u given No choice to opt for RSS else CPFL will not be sustainable when many opt out and go for RSS

*I never run the figures only agar agar think that OCBC annuities may benefit those people who js nice die at a certain age whereby beneficiaries (under CPFL) get nth. Ofc also need to make assumptions about the returns since their payout is non guaranteed up to 3.x%
How is it a ponzi scheme? Don't anyhow make comments when you have little knowledge on the matter. And again now you are mixing RSS and CPFL on sustainability. My goodness you need to learn not to be confused. :D
 

royalmix

Master Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
3,861
Reaction score
1,075
I see that the vdo didn't help you to understand and you mixed sustainable payouts with the viablility of 4% interest rate.
What video, I never watch and not interested!
Each cohort draws from its own pool so earlier cohorts do not depend on later cohort contributions unless it a ponzi scheme :D
You mean the video spread this fake news and you believe? Show me the CPF rule from CPFB website!

Do you know BBC and someone else also posted this a few mths ago, and when I said fake news, admin believe them and I kena! :ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
22,938
Reaction score
4,494
Because we will have lesser younger cohort to contribute to CPF system and more and more boomers start to withdraw from the system.
CPF is fundamentally a defined contribution system. Individuals (and their employers) deposit funds, and then they individually withdraw their own contributions (plus interest). I don't see how there are any demographic issues in a system like that. If there are fewer contributors, there are fewer CPF members, that's all. That'd be like a bank starting with 3 million smaller depositors then slowly, over a long period of time, ending up with 2.5 million larger depositors. (Singaporeans are getting wealthier, on average — also reflected to some extent in their CPF contributions.) If anything, fewer larger depositors would mean the CPF Board's customer service-related expenses fall.

GIC invests the CPF contribution base (via the SSGSes). I don't see how Singapore's aging population will affect GIC's long-term investment performance. How's that connected? I'm quite sure GIC is not 80% invested in pediatric pharmaceutical companies.
It is a legit ponzi scheme!
Thats why u given No choice to opt for RSS else CPFL will not be sustainable when many opt out and go for RSS
Longevity insurance is literally millenia old. (The Roman Empire introduced military pensions in 13 BCE. Even private sector pensions are quite old. American Express started their pension program in 1875.) Longevity insurance is simply the opposite bet to life insurance. Do you think life insurance is unsustainable too? How?

If you want to worry about a form of insurance with potential demographic problems, longevity insurance ain't it. I'd focus your worries on medical insurance, actually.
 

JetStorm

Senior Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
1,722
Reaction score
150
My fren was happy to make a full VHR a few years before reaching age 55. Not only that she dumped 100k into the son's CPF accounts. And now she needs those money for the spouse's and MIL medical expenses.
I assume your friend already hit FRS then do VHR?

For me I prefer funds to be liquid. If I do any VHR I will only do after 55 and after I hit FRS.
 

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
64,575
Reaction score
5,292
What happens when one turns 55 years old if his SA has more than ERS just before 55?
doesn't matter just before or not. in the end will just fund ra till frs.

the rest go oa.

What happens to my CPF savings when I turn 55?
When you turn 55, the following will happen to your CPF savings:

  • Retirement Account (RA): Savings from your Special Account (SA) and Ordinary Account (OA) will be transferred to your newly created RA, up to your Full Retirement Sum (FRS). Your SA savings will be transferred first, followed by your OA savings if your SA savings is insufficient to set aside your FRS.
  • SA closure: After the transfer, your SA will be closed, and any remaining SA savings will be transferred to your OA.
Find out more about what happens when you reach age 55.


https://www.cpf.gov.sg/service/article/what-happens-to-my-cpf-savings-when-i-turn-55
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
22,938
Reaction score
4,494
What happens when one turns 55 years old if his SA has more than ERS just before 55?
By default, on one’s 55th birthday the CPF Board sweeps the (then current) Full Retirement Sum from that well-funded Special Account into a new Retirement Account. The remainder is swept into OA, and the SA is closed.

That age 55+ member has the option to increase his/her RA by any amount — by $2, $200, $2,000, $20,000, or $200,000, as examples — subject to the (current) Enhanced Retirement Sum (ERS) limit. That option is available as long as the member is alive. Every time the ERS is raised every living age 55+ member has room to add some funds to RA even if he/she maxed out his/her RA in the past.

By the way, it’s mathematically difficult for a Special Account to reach the Enhanced Retirement Sum. To get there it requires zooming up to the Full Retirement Sum quickly, at the start of a working career (or even before), then decades of decent or better compensation (with compulsory contributions). Even then it’s difficult.
 
Last edited:
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top