Thanks for the explanation
Another question, some people advice paying off housing loan fully ASAP (wipe out as much of our OA as possible), but some people say should go for the longest tenure loan. Which one is a better option if we want to make good use of the CPF system?
BUT lets say u finance your house with just cash. You buy at 300k and sell at 350k. U get a profit of 50k PLUS your cpf is in ur account which generated another 20k (this the interest the govt paid u that we call accrued interest if u had used cpf to finance your house). So in my opinion u have made 70k (50+20k cpf interest).
i will go longest tenure, min OA downpayment.
if use hdb loan, the difference is only 0.1%. it is not going to hurt me too much. there is an insurance in hdb loan. you sway sway die after one year. your wife get the whole hdb without having to pay anymore installments.
if use bank loan, lock it in for 3 years. it is abt 2% now. your oa earns 0.5% more than bank loan. keep the money in the oa. at the end of 3 years, if bank interest rates rises above 2.5%, do partial repayment with oa. if bank interest remains low, continue to drag the loan.
this does not sound correct
case 1
before you buy house, you have 300k cpf, 0 cash
after you sell house, you have 320k cpf, 30k cash
you made 50k over 300k
case 2
before you buy house, you have 300k cash, 300k cpf
after you sell house, you have 350k cash, 320k cpf
you made 70k over 600k.
the principal is different for the two cases. with a larger principal, it is natural that the absolute profit is larger.
Your example doesn't sounds right too. Let's assume same starting point (eg 300k cpf 300k cash), and assume house was kept for 10yrs, buy price = 300k, sell price = 400k. Accured interest exclude compounding would be 2.5% x 300k x 10 = 75k. Let's also assume cash is earning insignificant interest at 0.05% to showcase the significance of accured interest for those who do not invest with their cash.
case 1
After you buy house, you have 300k cpf, 0 cash
after you sell house, you have 375k cpf, 400k cash
case 2
After you buy house, you have 0 cpf, 300k cash
after you sell house, you have 375k cpf, 325k cash
This example showcase the significance of accured interest. In case 1, after selling house u have a total of 775k for ur next house. For case 2, u can only afford a 700k house. The difference is bcos for a good 10yrs, govt is paying u the interest for the amt u have inside ur cpf. If u have used all that for housing, not only govt doesn't pay u interest, u need to cough back the accured interest after the sales of ur house.
Choose to use cpf for ur house only if u r invest-savvy, can get better returns from ur investment than cpf, and if u don't think u will be selling ur hdb.
Correct me if I'm wrong?
I should be going for HDB loan.
Considering whether to transfer some funds from OA to SA.
I should be going for HDB loan.
Considering whether to transfer some funds from OA to SA.
Take HDB loan, go for longest tenure. Use CPFIS to invest OA for maximum gains.
this one could be seow.
it is depends on whether you have withdrawn from your cpf for your previous properties.
if you have not, paying by cash may not be seow. it really depends if you are able to get better returns on your cash. so people just dont want to take risk.
but if you still owe cpf money, and you are paying by cash, yes, you are seow.
eg
you withdrew 200k + accrued interest from cpf.
you have 440k cash
you buy hdb for 440k.
you can use your cash to pay up everything such that you do not have anything left and still owe cpf 200k
or
you can take a loan of 200k, and pay the rest of the 240k with cash.
your remaining cash is paid back to cpf.
which is better?
then again, this is a hdb. so you would not have any property other than this. you would not have withdrawn anything. so you are not seow.

you are not right because, you are not using his numbers.Your example doesn't sounds right too. Let's assume same starting point (eg 300k cpf 300k cash), and assume house was kept for 10yrs, buy price = 300k, sell price = 400k. Accured interest exclude compounding would be 2.5% x 300k x 10 = 75k. Let's also assume cash is earning insignificant interest at 0.05% to showcase the significance of accured interest for those who do not invest with their cash.
case 1
After you buy house, you have 300k cpf, 0 cash
after you sell house, you have 375k cpf, 400k cash
case 2
After you buy house, you have 0 cpf, 300k cash
after you sell house, you have 375k cpf, 325k cash
This example showcase the significance of accured interest. In case 1, after selling house u have a total of 775k for ur next house. For case 2, u can only afford a 700k house. The difference is bcos for a good 10yrs, govt is paying u the interest for the amt u have inside ur cpf. If u have used all that for housing, not only govt doesn't pay u interest, u need to cough back the accured interest after the sales of ur house.
Choose to use cpf for ur house only if u r invest-savvy, can get better returns from ur investment than cpf, and if u don't think u will be selling ur hdb.
Correct me if I'm wrong?

you are not right because, you are not using his numbers.
he already say accrued interest is 20k, so why do you want to calculate his interest.
he did not mention 10 years so why are making this assumption.
he already mention that he sold his house of 350k. why are you saying that he sold it for 400k.
he mentioned that he would have made a profit of 70k and not 50k. why are you replacing it with your own profit.
you have switched his numbers all over the place. it has become your own calculations, not his.
this does not sound correct
case 1
before you buy house, you have 300k cpf, 0 cash
after you sell house, you have 320k cpf, 30k cash
you made 50k over 300k
case 2
before you buy house, you have 300k cash, 300k cpf
after you sell house, you have 350k cash, 320k cpf
you made 70k over 600k.
the principal is different for the two cases. with a larger principal, it is natural that the absolute profit is larger.
I dont think its a bad thing. Its ur own money anyway.
Lets say if u buy a property worth 300k and use cpf to pay, when u sell, u needa put back into ur own cpf the accrued interest (pay ur ownself the interest since govt dont pay u).
Scenario 1: Lets say u sell your house for 350k and accrued interest is 20k, u refund into ur cpf 320k (lets negate all the loans and interest etc for this maths). U get cash profit of 30k.
Scenario 2: u sell your house for 320k. 320k goes into your CPF and u get $0 cash proceeds.
Scenario 3: you sell your house for 270k. 270k goes into your cpf (you lose 30k out of the 300k initial house price.) you also lose out on the interest the govt would have paid u which is the "accrued interest" which is 20k.
Now some might argue that in scenario 3 you lose only 30k and not 50k so depends on how u see it.
BUT lets say u finance your house with just cash. You buy at 300k and sell at 350k. U get a profit of 50k PLUS your cpf is in ur account which generated another 20k (this the interest the govt paid u that we call accrued interest if u had used cpf to finance your house). So in my opinion u have made 70k (50+20k cpf interest).
Hopefully u understand better
go for longest tenure HDB loan, but use OA clear up asap if possible, then make the last laugh into OA to SA all the way. Investment wise, I preferred use hard cash and opt for 2nd time bto after 1st bto MOP will likely boost your wealth if you can make it there![]()
I should be going for HDB loan.
Considering whether to transfer some funds from OA to SA.
Take HDB loan, go for longest tenure. Use CPFIS to invest OA for maximum gains.
BITCOWS just gotten approval for CPFIS?? THANKS for inform!! Tonight ALL IN!!!LOL....yes...invest in those super high return product like BITCOINS......everyone sure HUAT big time....
BITCOWS just gotten approval for CPFIS?? THANKS for inform!! Tonight ALL IN!!!
Sent from Xiaomi MI MAX 3 using GAGT

Choose to use cpf for ur house only if u r invest-savvy, can get better returns from ur investment than cpf, and if u don't think u will be selling ur hdb.
Correct me if I'm wrong?
THEMIKOS was just stating arbitrary figures to explain why he thinks the incurred interest (from using CPF to by house) equates to 'loss of interest', and that you will stand to profit more if you use cash (due to govt paying you interest in ur CPF simply).
You were the one who started drifting off course by stating Case 1 & Case 2 with different principal. And since you think you are right, where do you infer from his post that he was comparing between different scenarios with different principal? I simply used my own sets of arbitrary figures to further reinforce his views on the incurred interest resulting in a loss of interest by correcting on your flawed assumption of comparing 2 cases with different principal.
Although I used different figures, but so what? As long as it illustrate the point fairly and correctly, anything goes. This is not an exam. There's no model answer, it is not the case where there is only 1 right answer.![]()
If can use CPF for Bitcoin investment, I think most of us here can really really retire early.![]()
If can use CPF for Bitcoin investment, I think most of us here can really really retire early.![]()