CPF after 55

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,458
Reaction score
5,524
Do you have any support evidence/ document for this?
It's mean alot for people going to 55, kindly give correct information.
Sure, use the CPF LIFE Estimator. Increase your RA balance and see what happens to your monthly payout. You can also read how about the CPF Board has designed CPF LIFE and their statements about interest computation and crediting.
 

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
66,167
Reaction score
5,824
Do you have any support evidence/ document for this?
It's mean alot for people going to 55, kindly give correct information.
It depends on what your outcome is.

if you are alive you get the interest, if you pass on, whatever interest that’s earned from your principal sum doesn’t go to your nominee.

dork32 is trying to say if the interest is really yours, then even after you pass on any interest earned on the principal sum you put in should go to your nominee, if it doesn’t then it isn’t really yours.

whereas BBCWatcher comes from the perspective of dead people don’t need money/interest. Hence while you are alive you get it, but after you pass on it doesn’t go to your nominee.

i think that’s the gist…
 

Value.Matrix

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2019
Messages
628
Reaction score
58
Interest is always computed monthly and tracked for you (and your nominees). Interest accrues within your individual accounts and/or as part of your individual life annuity claim on the CPF Lifelong Income Fund.

Interest doesn't suddenly stop when you enter CPF LIFE. Your CPF LIFE monthly payouts are computed based on full interest computation. If interest did hypothetically stop your CPF LIFE monthly payout would be a lot lower no matter what payout plan you choose.
Why would anyone wants to put their money with CPFLIFE or in fact, ANY annuity if interest are not even computed into the monthly payout.

The fact, and difference between annuity BBC are familiar with, and the annuity Singaporeans know is that Singaporeans are conditioned that there is no free lunch.

The "free lunch" here refers to anyone losing the interest computed if one dies by age 85. Deceased could not draw the interest because they died earlier. And that interest does not belong to anyone except the common pool who lives past 85.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,458
Reaction score
5,524
But this gets messy if there is divorce.
I don't see why. It's actually less messy because the couple's resources are more efficiently deployed. Family courts might have to apportion the monthly income while both spouses are living, but they already apportion CPF savings.

This is similar to how the U.S. system works, as it happens -- and other countries are similar, too. The retirement benefit usually survives separation and divorce. Ex-spouses still get their benefits. (Special rules sometimes apply for short marrages and remarriages.) In fact, Singapore's divorce rate is comparatively low.
Plus the deceased spouse may want to leave the some or all CPF money to children and not all to the benefit of spouse.
That's still an option. Nobody is forced to choose the CPF LIFE "Partner Plan." It's an option, not an obligation.
Employers need time to factor in resignations and no pay leave for the month.
No, not really. Many employers already transfer funds to the CPF Board within the same work calendar month. By the time you get to day 28 (or whatever) you already know whether your employee has worked the lion's share of the month. Quibbling about 1 or 2 work days isn't something most employers lose sleep over.
Plus cashflow issue. Why would a company want to pay earlier.
Exactly, but why should the employee have to pay a steep charge (in lost CPF interest) for the employer's cashflow preferences? The CPF Board has a deadline, and it could either pull the deadline forward about 2 weeks or it could apply some sort of carrot/stick approach. For example, employers that meet the same calendar month "early" deadline might receive a small annual rebate. Employers that don't wouldn't.
 

Andrew833

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2017
Messages
17,393
Reaction score
6,006
Why would anyone wants to put their money with CPFLIFE or in fact, ANY annuity if interest are not even computed into the monthly payout.

The fact, and difference between annuity BBC are familiar with, and the annuity Singaporeans know is that Singaporeans are conditioned that there is no free lunch.

The "free lunch" here refers to anyone losing the interest computed if one dies by age 85. Deceased could not draw the interest because they died earlier. And that interest does not belong to anyone except the common pool who lives past 85.
The "free lunch" here refers to anyone losing the interest computed if one dies by age 85. Deceased could not draw the interest because they died earlier. And that interest does not belong to anyone except the common pool who lives past 85.
Yes, this is what I know and it's also a truth but BBC said otherwise lol....
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,458
Reaction score
5,524
Why would anyone wants to put their money with CPFLIFE or in fact, ANY annuity if interest are not even computed into the monthly payout.
Of course they wouldn't, or probably wouldn't anyway.

Civil servants in Singapore were eligible for lifetime pensions, and many retired civil servants are receiving those pensions right now. Surely this isn't an alien concept. Civil service pensions predate Singapore's independence.
 

vsvs24

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
11,345
Reaction score
3,706
I don't see why. It's actually less messy because the couple's resources are more efficiently deployed. Family courts might have to apportion the monthly income while both spouses are living, but they already apportion CPF savings.

This is similar to how the U.S. system works, as it happens -- and other countries are similar, too. The retirement benefit usually survives separation and divorce. Ex-spouses still get their benefits. (Special rules sometimes apply for short marrages and remarriages.) In fact, Singapore's divorce rate is comparatively low.

That's still an option. Nobody is forced to choose the CPF LIFE "Partner Plan." It's an option, not an obligation.

No, not really. Many employers already transfer funds to the CPF Board within the same work calendar month. By the time you get to day 28 (or whatever) you already know whether your employee has worked the lion's share of the month. Quibbling about 1 or 2 work days isn't something most employers lose sleep over.

Exactly, but why should the employee have to pay a steep charge (in lost CPF interest) for the employer's cashflow preferences? The CPF Board has a deadline, and it could either pull the deadline forward about 2 weeks or it could apply some sort of carrot/stick approach. For example, employers that meet the same calendar month "early" deadline might receive a small annual rebate. Employers that don't wouldn't.
I would not want the government to pay this kind of rebate. The companies that do not have cashflow issues are already better off than the firms trying to make ends meet. Can imagine in the end it is eg banks getting the rebate.

Already they say must increase GST. Should not waste money on such rebates.

A divorce is messy and traumatic enough. Don't drag Family Courts and CPF board into this. They have better things to do.

And CPF rules are already complex enough. This kind of joint sharing of CPF for spouse would complicate things
 
Last edited:

sohguanh

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
9,436
Reaction score
3,195
Where you get info that interest is always computed monthly and tracked for you ..... That's only true as long as money remains in RA.

Once money moved from RA to CPFL as annuity premium, you can forget about the interest on the premium. It not yours nor your beneficiary :p

You only start to recover the interest forgone after your monthly payouts exhaust the premium. And you have to live long enough to recover the interest lost or gain more than the interest lost. There must be losers and winners for this game to go on and on. So take your bet. You have no choice whatever CPFL plan you opt for 😀

I read through so many comments and I think yours explain it well. The whole annuity game need to have winners and losers. In this game those who live the longest will benefit while those short life just "lose out". This is a very clever mechanism by govt. Basically they are pooling every members monies into a common pool and from this pool to distribute payout which means govt no need to pump in additional cash from govt coffers correct? And this is made mandatory for all members.

But I got a question in this game what if theoretically majority of the members live super long life then payout will decrease for each living member? At this stage will govt be forced to pump in monies to the pool? Or govt has data on the mortality rates of local elderly? If most live super long life I think soon they will review it soon like others say age 65 push further to 70 or even 75 or 80 what is stopping them correct? Since all such decision members don't have voting rights except in election day to elect the correct party in.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,458
Reaction score
5,524
The "free lunch" here refers to anyone losing the interest computed if one dies by age 85. Deceased could not draw the interest because they died earlier. And that interest does not belong to anyone except the common pool who lives past 85.
Yes, this is what I know and it's also a truth but BBC said otherwise lol....
OK, so let's pursue your "logic" a bit further. By your "logic" term life insurance should be free to everyone who dies after age 65 (the term age, let's suppose) -- right? Because they receive zero payout, and therefore that's worthless, so why pay any premium?

....It doesn't work that way. With a life annuity you buy exactly that: a lifetime income stream. $X in provides $Y/month out, for life, however long it lasts. This isn't a current or savings account. Interest all along the way is factored into your $Y amount. Increase X, you increase principal and interest, and you increase Y.

The outcome with CPF LIFE is actuarially fair and not-for-profit. The interest rates (4.0% plus bonus interest), computation, and crediting are exactly the same. The only thing that's different (from the classic Retirement Sum Scheme) is what you're buying with RA dollars. You're buying an individual life annuity claim, with a choice of 3 payout plans and a choice of starting age within a 5 year age bracket. In short, you're buying a lifetime pension. Just as civil servants in Singapore bought theirs back in the not-too-distant past in the form of years of service and pay grades.

Lifetime income will of course vary in length. But if you live to 100 you're not "stealing" interest. You paid for the same life annuity at the same price as everyone else in your cohort, and you just happened to live to 100. You bought insurance, specifically longevity insurance. You didn't buy a current or savings account.
 

vsvs24

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
11,345
Reaction score
3,706
But I got a question in this game what if theoretically majority of the members live super long life then payout will decrease for each living member? At this stage will govt be forced to pump in monies to the pool? Or govt has data on the mortality rates of local elderly? If most live super long life I think soon they will review it soon like others say age 65 push further to 70 or even 75 or 80 what is stopping them correct? Since all such decision members don't have voting rights except in election day to elect the correct party in.
They will reduce payout. CPF life payout are not guaranteed and reviewed yearly. Likely will also push back payout start date so that payout amount is higher.
Another thing to note, while your withdrawal SA is as it is, CPF life payout :

Central Provident Fund Board (CPFB) https://www.cpf.gov.sg/member/faq/retirement-income/monthly-payouts/are-cpf-life-payouts-guaranteed-

Are CPF LIFE payouts guaranteed?
CPF LIFE payouts are not guaranteed, but they are designed to be stable. Any adjustments to CPF LIFE payouts are expected to be small and gradual. CPF LIFE is a self-sustaining insurance scheme where payouts are matched to premiums. Guaranteeing a minimum payout would require higher premiums.

https://www.cpf.gov.sg/member/faq/r...e-premium-and-payout-for-each-plan-calculated

How are the CPF LIFE premium and payout for each plan calculated?​

The CPF LIFE premium and payout levels are determined by an independent actuarial consultant. They are dependent on factors such as:
  1. Gender;
  2. Age;
  3. CPF interest rates; and
  4. Mortality rates

Just tried the CPF life estimator. After it calculates, there is a footnote that shows :
  • Payouts are based on the current CPF interest rates.
  • CPF LIFE monthly payout may be adjusted every year to take into account factors such as interest rates and mortality experience.
  • This tool is for illustrative purposes only and actual results may vary.
So looks like review is yearly.

I will take screenshots every year from now till 65 to see if it changes 😎.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,458
Reaction score
5,524
I would not want the government to pay this kind of rebate. The companies that do not have cashflow issues are already better off than the firms trying to make ends meet. Can imagine in the end it is eg banks getting the rebate.
OK, so just pull the deadline forward by about 2 weeks from the current deadline. In Singapore we have payroll computers and FAST. This isn't 1962 any more.
A divorce is messy and traumatic enough. Don't drag Family Courts and CPF board into this. They have better things to do.
With due respect, WTF do you mean? Couples that choose the "Partner Plan" would reduce the amount of work Family Courts and the CPF Board need to do. Perhaps you're not familiar with the complications that already exist?
And CPF rules are already complex enough. This kind of joint sharing of CPF for spouse would complicate things
Again, I don't see how. If you're a married couple, you usually want your spouse to be taken care of when you predecease him/her. Without any worry. A "Partner Plan" does that, and it's totally simple. You just sign up, and the CPF Board takes care of the rest. You don't have to worry about each setting aside dollars in some savings account or anything else. You don't have to worry about shuffling dollars between CPF accounts between spouses. All of that complexity goes away, and it is very complicated.

In fact, I don't particularly care if it's a legally married couple. To my way of thinking the partner can be practically anyone. Got a disabled younger sister that you're taking care of? No problem! She can be your CPF partner as far as I'm concerned. When you pass on, she continues receiving CPF LIFE payouts for the rest of her life, however long it lasts, guaranteed by the Government of Singapore. You're buying a single life annuity, not trying to cobble together some weird combination of two life annuities (which costs more) and private savings, which is much more difficult.
 

dork32

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
9,366
Reaction score
1,578
No, that's not correct. The interest is fully, individually computed as part of your individual life annuity claim on the CPF Lifelong Income Fund. Nobody else except CPF LIFE participants draw from the pool. Your monthly payout amount would be much lower without interest.

Then you would be wrong. The interest goes straight into boosting your monthly payout amount, and a higher monthly payout amount definitely counts.
you mentioned it belongs to the participants. it just means that if i live long enuf, the money is mine, if i do not, then the interest is not mine. i do not go about counting birds in the bush. i do not the value the toto ticket at 1 mil today. i value it at 1 mil only when i strike.

correct, you get an increased payout. have to done the maths?
take the cpf life standard. vs cpf life basic at 200k.
cpf life standard, 0 interest goes to you, your personal account earns a perfect 0 interest every year.
200k at 4% in cpf life basic is 8k year.at worst 20% is lost pool. this is 6.4k a year.
the payout of basic is 140 less than standard. this is 1.7k a month.
no, not all the money has gone into the increasing your payout. much of it has gone to funding people that refuse to die.

why not i suggest this deal to you? you give me $6.4k a year and i pay you $140 a month, ok?
 

dork32

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
9,366
Reaction score
1,578
Where you get info that interest is always computed monthly and tracked for you ..... That's only true as long as money remains in RA.

Once money moved from RA to CPFL as annuity premium, you can forget about the interest on the premium. It not yours nor your beneficiary :p

You only start to recover the interest forgone after your monthly payouts exhaust the premium. And you have to live long enough to recover the interest lost or gain more than the interest lost. There must be losers and winners for this game to go on and on. So take your bet. You have no choice whatever CPFL plan you opt for 😀
there are more than one person that agrees with me that interest in the pool in not my money unless i live long enuf.
 

vsvs24

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
11,345
Reaction score
3,706
OK, so just pull the deadline forward by about 2 weeks from the current deadline. In Singapore we have payroll computers and FAST. This isn't 1962 any more.
Can't just think about employees. Have to consider employer cashflow.
With due respect, WTF do you mean? Couples that choose the "Partner Plan" would reduce the amount of work Family Courts and the CPF Board need to do. Perhaps you're not familiar with the complications that already exist?
Your language is not nice. Putting "With due respect" followed by XXX does not make it less impolite.

I can't see how coming up with this suggested scheme would reduce the work of Family courts and CPF Board. Family court now don't have to bother about CPF. Do you know how much it will cost for CPFB to implement a scheme like this ? They cannot make or change policies just to suit a few people but should cater to vast majority.
Again, I don't see how. If you're a married couple, you usually want your spouse to be taken care of when you predecease him/her. Without any worry.
A simple and fuss free CPF Nomination to the spouse can also do this.

A "Partner Plan" does that, and it's totally simple. You just sign up, and the CPF Board takes care of the rest. You don't have to worry about each setting aside dollars in some savings account or anything else. You don't have to worry about shuffling dollars between CPF accounts between spouses. All of that complexity goes away, and it is very complicated.

In fact, I don't particularly care if it's a legally married couple. To my way of thinking the partner can be practically anyone. Got a disabled younger sister that you're taking care of? No problem! She can be your CPF partner as far as I'm concerned. When you pass on, she continues receiving CPF LIFE payouts for the rest of her life, however long it lasts, guaranteed by the Government of Singapore. You're buying a single life annuity, not trying to cobble together some weird combination of two life annuities (which costs more) and private savings, which is much more difficult.
Easy for you. But a lot more work for CPF board. Means more budget needed.

If anyone can be partner, then government later have to handle disputes subsequently such as scams, joint with mistress or tourguide etc.

Just keep it simple lah. Already so complicated.
 
Last edited:

Okenba

Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
5,324
Reaction score
996
If we shouldn't get more CPF life because it's not our money until it gets paid out to us, then we shouldn't buy insurance because its not our money until it gets paid out to us?

CPF life is just insurance. It is insurance for those who live too long. If you don't think you will live long, get less. If you think you will live long, get more.
 

dork32

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
9,366
Reaction score
1,578
OK, so let's pursue your "logic" a bit further. By your "logic" term life insurance should be free to everyone who dies after age 65 (the term age, let's suppose) -- right? Because they receive zero payout, and therefore that's worthless, so why pay any premium?
take my example i am paying $6 a month and i am insured for 50k should i die. yes, my insurance is not worth 0, but is it worth 50k? definitely no, it is probably worth $6. the value of peace of mind should i suddenly die.
 

item2sell

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
16,842
Reaction score
6,205
there are more than one person that agrees with me that interest in the pool in not my money unless i live long enuf.

to say in nasty way.
Once you drain all your RA (around 80-85yo). The money you take comes from the interest who already dead. 拿死人钱。
 

Value.Matrix

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2019
Messages
628
Reaction score
58
If we shouldn't get more CPF life because it's not our money until it gets paid out to us, then we shouldn't buy insurance because its not our money until it gets paid out to us?

CPF life is just insurance. It is insurance for those who live too long. If you don't think you will live long, get less. If you think you will live long, get more.
Problem is this is not a choice. Its a bundle package where you are to buy it together with other packages. So with a forced decision, some would rather buy their own insurance or even live off without insurance.

Term insurance, some you can opt out.

So we just do what we feel is fairer to ourselves.
 

item2sell

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
16,842
Reaction score
6,205
If we shouldn't get more CPF life because it's not our money until it gets paid out to us, then we shouldn't buy insurance because its not our money until it gets paid out to us?

CPF life is just insurance. It is insurance for those who live too long. If you don't think you will live long, get less. If you think you will live long, get more.

yes you are not mandated to buy any insurance. Even then the insurance payout is gauaranteed.

CPFLife T&C is changing with possible lowering of payout as more people lives longer.

my dad has an annuity. It is fixed payout
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top