The "free lunch" here refers to anyone losing the interest computed if one dies by age 85. Deceased could not draw the interest because they died earlier. And that interest does not belong to anyone except the common pool who lives past 85.
Yes, this is what I know and it's also a truth but BBC said otherwise lol....
OK, so let's pursue your "logic" a bit further. By your "logic" term life insurance should be free to everyone who dies after age 65 (the term age, let's suppose) -- right? Because they receive zero payout, and therefore that's worthless, so why pay any premium?
....It doesn't work that way. With a life annuity you buy exactly that: a lifetime income stream. $X in provides $Y/month out, for life, however long it lasts. This isn't a current or savings account. Interest all along the way is factored into your $Y amount. Increase X, you increase principal and interest, and you increase Y.
The
outcome with CPF LIFE is actuarially fair and not-for-profit. The interest rates (4.0% plus bonus interest), computation, and crediting are exactly the same. The only thing that's different (from the classic Retirement Sum Scheme) is what you're buying with RA dollars. You're buying an individual life annuity claim, with a choice of 3 payout plans and a choice of starting age within a 5 year age bracket. In short, you're buying a lifetime pension. Just as civil servants in Singapore bought theirs back in the not-too-distant past in the form of years of service and pay grades.
Lifetime income will of course vary in length. But if you live to 100 you're not "stealing" interest. You paid for the same life annuity at the same price as everyone else in your cohort, and you just happened to live to 100. You bought
insurance, specifically longevity insurance. You didn't buy a current or savings account.