how come people are confused with VHR.
it is quoted clearly should VHR+RA go lower than FRS ,
one need to pledge to refund additional amount equal to the shortfall of FRS -RA-Ra-withdrawal.
with conditions
1.value of property is sufficient to cover the shortfall (RA remaining) to FRS.
VHR -cpf amount used for housing loan payment+accrued interest.
do not confuse with less VHR will have problem to withdraw RA in excess of BRS.
keyword: Pledging, cpf will create a charge to your house, when the house is sold, the charge will have priority to take the money first.
good thread by the way
Don't you find it ironic? We are taking our
OWN cpf monies to pay for the hdb. Even if we pay back later it is pay back to our
OWN. Since it is our
OWN why CPF so super siao onz to ensure this is strictly adhered too? I repeat it is our
OWN monies not govt monies why we cannot decide need to pay up full or less full since it is our
OWN monies ? Cpf need to be like a nanny to keep track of our
OWN monies leh? Giving us crap we cannot manage properly our
OWN monies do not gel if one can provide statements we can handle it well. E.g my cpf investment over the years is better than their pathetic 2.5 and/or 4 but no they take the easy way out a blanket policy for all ppl and I repeat it is our
OWN monies we are talking here not govt monies.