What you said is true. I stand corrected.Those are two different statements. Each SA shield has value or it doesn’t. If it has value to you, it’s still worth doing, even if you missed a prior opportunity. Yes, in a perfect world we’d take advantage of every legal opportunity we’re able to, but that’s not realistic. I’ve missed a couple; practically everyone has. However, unless you have a time machine, you do the best you can going forward.
I believe you must keep a minimum of 40k in SA before any investment activity.
You can drop an Ordinary Account down to zero via qualified educational payments, housing-related payments, and/or via OA transfers to eligible recipients (spouse, elders). The $20,000 minimum you refer to only applies to the CPF Investment Scheme. If you really, really want to prevent your Retirement Account from being funded much, you can.
This is why it’s important to convey what you’re thinking calmly, without the name calling. You might miss what’s technically possible. “I’ve got a secret” games just waste everyone’s time, whether or not you even have a “secret.” Nobody is impressed; quite the opposite.
Yes. It is possible assuming your MA is maxed out.For example, I invest all the balance in SA in January, then I withdraw $37,740 from OA in January and then VC back $37,740 into all 3 accounts in January. Then sell the SA investment in January, assuming no loss in the investment, this way, the SA will increase by at least 5k. Indirectly, I am transfering OA money(about 5K) to SA. Can?
Answered in this FAQ.Even when the full amount of FRS been transferred to RA, one still needs to maintain 40K in SA?
I totally disagree, depends where u buy. I got my new HDB in Queenstown area. Still remember the price I bought, I told some old unker business suppliers, and he laughed at me. Commented it is super overpriced. But 10years later, I sold at 390k profit and I upgraded to EC, now i look forward for my EC to be privatise on the 10th year and if can sell at good profits to foreigners, I will seriously consider too. Who knows what happens.
My purpose of sharing is, do not top up aggressively. Use your funds for your home. If u stay in in nice home, it is better than just money.
Dork32’s hypothetical centered around whether it’s possible to minimize Retirement Account creation funding such that CPF LIFE participation isn’t automatic. And the core answer is no, at least not if you have $40,000 or more in your Special Account on the cusp of your 55th birthday. I illustrated the maximally minimized RA funding “sweep,” which is possible to do as I’ve just explained. You then got upset about that information but wouldn’t say why. Then you present an alternative scenario that is less aligned with Dork32’s hypothetical because it ends up with $20,000 sourced from OA, which isn’t a requirement. Then you get upset again when I point out the misalignment and the fact OA can be dropped to zero if desired. (And I happen to know Dork32 could easily do so as he’s explained. He has more than $20,000 of outstanding mortgage debt, so no problem if he wishes to pursue such a scenario.)I am sharing common-sense, practical and beneficial strategies to meet dork32's request.
Yes. It is possible assuming your MA is maxed out.
Sent from . using GAGT
Dork32’s hypothetical centered around whether it’s possible to minimize Retirement Account creation funding such that CPF LIFE participation isn’t automatic. And the core answer is no, at least not if you have $40,000 or more in your Special Account on the cusp of your 55th birthday. I illustrated the maximally minimized RA funding “sweep,” which is possible to do as I’ve just explained. You then got upset about that information but wouldn’t say why. Then you present an alternative scenario that is less aligned with Dork32’s hypothetical because it ends up with $20,000 sourced from OA, which isn’t a requirement. Then you get upset again when I point out the misalignment and the fact OA can be dropped to zero if desired. (And I happen to know Dork32 could easily do so as he’s explained. He has more than $20,000 of outstanding mortgage debt, so no problem if he wishes to pursue such a scenario.)
In what ways, if any, do you disagree with my summary?
Yes it won't. But money will be stuck in MA. You end up having lesser money to withdraw.Even if the MA is not maxed, it doesn't affect the percentage of the VC amount into SA.
Yes it won't. But money will be stuck in MA. You end up having lesser money to withdraw.
Sent from . using GAGT
crimsontactics and I are probably the only ones to actively transfer from OA to SA at a young age.
Having reached and exceeded the FRS in SA in 2015, the ever changing annual retirement sum is no longer a concern.
Time is money. Don’t hesitate. Transfer from OA to SA today.
Any way, even after 55, the first 20k in OA and 40k in SA cannot be invested. Just checked my CPF accounts.
Any idea why can withdraw all but cannot invest the $20K OA and $40K SA? To prevent shielding?
Have to top up too like crisontactics cause younger age haven’t accumulate too much money in oa anyway.
Top up 100k is no easy feat but clever ! At 65, will have 600k by doing nth at all. Don’t even need to worry about FRS
Some people start to think of transfer only when they are in their late 40s or early 50s. While it is never too late to start investing, it is certainly too late when it comes to transfer from OA to SA. Time lost is money lost.
To earn the extra 1% interest on the first 60K