cpf Special account shielding

kelhot2001

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2004
Messages
5,736
Reaction score
2,311
Let me guess by your time.

No more CPFIS-SA.

Once FRS formed, no more SA. All go to meet ERS or go to OA including new contributions or top-ups, if not withdrawn.

All net proceeds from property go back to CPF.

Bobian lor, keep in OA got 2.5 percent. Keep in MBS, can only smell nia
 

maple96

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2017
Messages
2,225
Reaction score
6
What do you think?
It’s allowed under the framework of using CPF to invest.
And the funds goes back to the respective acct.

Still safe with them......lol

U should focus on what the auditors think if they find out? If it is considered an offence, what will happen to those who commit the offence, to those who teach :s13:

U are allowed to invest CPF SA for the medium to long term. But if u invest less than that just to "deceive" CPFB into drawing more from OA instead of SA into RA, will it be considered 'ok"?
 

kelhot2001

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2004
Messages
5,736
Reaction score
2,311
U should focus on what the auditors think if they find out? If it is considered an offence, what will happen to those who commit the offence, to those who teach :s13:

U are allowed to invest CPF SA for the medium to long term. But if u invest less than that just to "deceive" CPFB into drawing more from OA instead of SA into RA, will it be considered 'ok"?

Nope, it is not ok in my opinion
Our laws are general cover very huge grey areas


What will happen as usual, they will kill one to warn a thousand and pray that the one kill is not you
 

RoLanTo

Master Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
4,220
Reaction score
339
Think still depends on how many % or people can do the hack. If only so miniority ppl can achieve it. What for they go thru big trouble to stop ppl improving their retirement payout.

I thought govt say less than 50% people even manage to hit min sum? To do the hack. Your SA must hit min sum. Your OA must also have more than min sum to fully exploit the benefit right?
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,625
Reaction score
5,607
To do the hack. Your SA must hit min sum. Your OA must also have more than min sum to fully exploit the benefit right?
No, not really. "SA shielding" has merit when both of these conditions hold just before your 55th birthday:

1. You have "materially" more than $40,000 in your Special Account -- in other words, you have a non-trivial number of SA dollars that can be shielded. (You're not going to bother if you're trying to shield $5.) You could make a Special Account top up and/or transfer OA funds to SA in order to raise your SA balance, and that's a good thing to do because you want to end up with as many SA dollars as possible.

2. After satisfying condition #1, you still have enough in your Ordinary Account to make up most or all of the difference to the Full Retirement Sum (i.e. the FRS minus $40K). You could muster these OA dollars from repayment of OA funds (plus accrued interest) used for housing (and education) and/or redemption of CPF Investment Scheme (OA) assets.
 

antro65

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2008
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
I wanted to do SA account shielding as my RA is going to be created soon, so will be going to check with a bank RM,
any advice how else to invest the CPFSA for the short term?
Thanks!!:s11:
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
110,058
Reaction score
22,984
I wanted to do SA account shielding as my RA is going to be created soon, so will be going to check with a bank RM,
any advice how else to invest the CPFSA for the short term?
Thanks!!:s11:
Can try SGS 6 months bond.

Sent from Samsung SM-N960F using GAGT
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,625
Reaction score
5,607
I wanted to do SA account shielding as my RA is going to be created soon, so will be going to check with a bank RM,
any advice how else to invest the CPFSA for the short term?
Thanks!!:s11:
You don't need or even want your bank to do this, because that just won't work due to the unit trust's hefty sales charge. You want to use a zero sales charge platform, such as POEMS. And you want to use a CPF Investment Scheme (SA) approved Singapore dollar bond unit trust. Look in this table to find a bond unit trust you like that has both of these characteristics:

1. Included under CPFIS-SA.

2. A risk class of "Low to Medium Risk - Narrowly Focused - Country - Singapore."

A low expense ratio is helpful as a tie breaker but not too important for these purposes.

The Eastspring Singapore Select Bond Fund Class A looks like a very good choice in this role.

Can try SGS 6 months bond.
Theoretically that could work if your bank can find one to sell you that's maturing when you need it to mature. Realistically, though, this is so hard to execute as to be impractical. I would just use POEMS, dollarDEX, or FSMOne and a low volatility unit trust to pull this off.
 

tangent314

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jul 26, 2002
Messages
5,136
Reaction score
224
I wanted to do SA account shielding as my RA is going to be created soon, so will be going to check with a bank RM,
any advice how else to invest the CPFSA for the short term?

My recommendation:

Create an account with POEMS, link your CPF-SA account. Once that is done, make a purchase:

Fund name: Nikko AM Shenton Short Term Bond Fund SGD
Settlement: CPFISSA
Amount: Your SA balance minus $40000
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,625
Reaction score
5,607
My recommendation:

Create an account with POEMS, link your CPF-SA account. Once that is done, make a purchase:

Fund name: Nikko AM Shenton Short Term Bond Fund SGD
Settlement: CPFISSA
Amount: Your SA balance minus $40000
I disagree with the specific unit trust. That one holds assets well beyond/outside Singapore, which is why it's listed differently in terms of risk. But otherwise that's the formula.

The formula can be mechanically tested in advance by making the unit trust's minimum initial contribution, to understand the process and the execution time in terms of when the Special Account deduction occurs. Armed with that information you'd then execute the final big unit trust purchase for shielding early enough but not too early to beat the "sweep" into your 55th birthday Retirement Account formation.
 
Last edited:

Guojing88

Master Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2004
Messages
3,690
Reaction score
867
I disagree with the specific unit trust. That one holds assets well beyond/outside Singapore, which is why it's listed differently in terms of risk. But otherwise that's the formula.

The formula can be mechanically tested in advance by making the unit trust's minimum initial contribution, to understand the process and the execution time in terms of when the Special Account deduction occurs. Armed with that information you'd then execute the final big unit trust purchase for shielding early enough but not too early to beat the "sweep" into your 55th birthday Retirement Account formation.

Interesting that Lorna Tan used that specific Nikko fund for the shield.
 

decibel.

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
6,067
Reaction score
560
Hi I read somewhere that recommends buying Tbill 6 months for shielding. So let's say next month my 55 birthday then this month I use 600K in SA to buy T Bill left 40K remain in SA. After 6 months, the 600K automatic go back to my SA? Is that how it works?

Sent from HUAWEI VOG-L29 using GAGT
 

oceanicmanta

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
9,671
Reaction score
1,382
what would happen if after shielding, the RA amount is less than FRS ...

Would there be a 2nd SA sweep into RA to meet FRS after shield is removed ?
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,625
Reaction score
5,607
Hi I read somewhere that recommends buying Tbill 6 months for shielding. So let's say next month my 55 birthday then this month I use 600K in SA to buy T Bill left 40K remain in SA. After 6 months, the 600K automatic go back to my SA? Is that how it works?
That's one way, but ~7 months of SA interest loss is an enormously steep price to pay. The unit trust-based method is much lower cost.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top