whether the person has enough liquidity is not for me or you to answer.
It wasn’t me who attempted a universal answer. I said it was “far fetched” that most readers of this forum would be materially liquidity constrained if they transferred even one dollar from OA to SA, and that’s true. Far fetched doesn’t mean impossible.
putting money into cpf will give you a better return if you are looking at 55 and beyond. You are losing liquidity if you are looking use the money to fund your next car purchase, property purchase, business investment before 55
That’s not the whole story. For those readers who reach both the Basic Healthcare Sum and the Full Retirement Sum — and that’ll happen to some readers in their 30s or perhaps even earlier — the portion of their compulsory contributions ordinarily earmarked for MA will spill over into OA. That is, they reach a point when the inflow into OA is “supercharged,” above and beyond what ordinarily flows into OA. Again, this can happen way before age 55, and it happens that much sooner with some combination of OA to SA transfers, MA top ups, SA top ups, earlier attainment of maximum bonus interest, and the higher interest plus compounding. Once you have a bigger monthly inflow into OA you have
more mortgage servicing power (more liquidity for housing), not less.
What I’ve just described is part of how this system works, too. Many (not all) readers can exploit what I’ve just described. For example, there are many readers who are delaying marriage or not getting married, and they then buy under the HDB Singles Scheme at age 35. This pattern is common and getting more common. A lot of these individuals can follow the pattern I’ve described, do really well, and have absolutely no liquidity concerns in the world.
There’s also the “HDB sweep,” when HDB sucks all OA dollars above $20,000 and pushes them into HDB leasehold equity, which you cannot even borrow against, when you take a HDB loan. These individuals have a really powerful incentive to transfer some dollars, and the sooner the better.
SRS gives very miserable returns. money sitting in srs hardly earns you anything. you will be forced to invest if you dont want to let inflation erode away your savings.
Yes, and unlike all of the traditional CPF accounts most investments are not principal guaranteed (except the very lowest yielding ones). That’s another reason why you’d really rather avoid a premature withdrawal. SRS funds need ample time to grow.