[CPU] KEEP YOUR IVY BRIDGE-E

ZrE0_Cha0s

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
16,703
Reaction score
26
VT-X and VT-D you mean?

And yes, I don't recall seeing the newer extensions being mentioned as a requirement anywhere

All I know for gaming is that as long got enough clock speed (not even number of cores/threads) can liao :s13:



Does the same apply to Skylake?

den what about kabylake den? though i need VT for my emulator as well.
 

RobinTeoHood

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
14,628
Reaction score
2
The latest z170 mobos are new or end of the line of the current range of processors? I referring to the tic or tock thing. Is the next in line a leap in technology?

Wondering if I should upgrade from z77, getting a bit of hardware problems.

Sent from Space using GAGT
 

watzup_ken

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2003
Messages
25,671
Reaction score
2,122

Innovation is definitely not. There is nothing innovative nor refreshing since the Sandy Bridge days. Every other processor refresh after sees minute incremental improvements likely due to the lack of competition.
 

Encrypted11

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
5,911
Reaction score
253
Heng no wonder moi ivybridge thinkpad still can tong on 1.2GHz for battery plan + almost maxed power management.
For office (less heavier excel spreadsheets), beedio playback and a fair bit of browser tabs.
Looks like still can tong for years ahead.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
48,321
Reaction score
7,465
jin moody moi never invest in AMD back in Jan 2016.
Now 1 year later AMD share price up 500%.
 

FinalTidus

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2004
Messages
35,125
Reaction score
1,234
Looks like my i5-2500K will be the longest CPU I have ever owned. For a 6 year old CPU, it still stays so relevant in today's games and apps.

As expected Kabylake is again another disappointment.

Begging for Ryuzen to be out soon. My i5-2500K is just begging to have a worthy successor. :(
 

xonix

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2001
Messages
17,587
Reaction score
1,689
If AMD can offer a 8 core equivalent of a Intel i5 quad core price, take my money !!!
 
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
240
Reaction score
0
What about i5 2400? Should I upgrade?

Just upgraded gpu from gtx670 to gtx1060 but didnt feel much difference... could it be cpu / ram bottleneck?
 
Last edited:

exodiver

Banned
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
1,779
Reaction score
0
What about i5 2400? Should I upgrade?

Just upgraded gpu from gtx670 to gtx1060 but didnt feel much difference... could it be cpu / ram bottleneck?

Unless u need ddr4 ram (meaning u want to be able upgrade to beyond 32gb of ram in the future), don't bother....
 

LiLAsN

Master Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
2,690
Reaction score
504
What about i5 2400? Should I upgrade?

Just upgraded gpu from gtx670 to gtx1060 but didnt feel much difference... could it be cpu / ram bottleneck?

That is because you've replaced your old card with a slightly similar performing card. Basically, not even a worthy upgrade. If you would have bought the 900 series cards like the 980 Ti that has now been priced below $500 on Carousell, then you would have seen a major boost to performance. You have literally just wasted hundreds of dollars for an updated architecture of the 670 pretty much. Performance hasn't been improved much over the years thanks to AMD not being a worthy competitor to push a major innovation in the GPU and CPU industry these past few years.

GTX 670 vs GTX 1060
http://www.hwcompare.com/31227/geforce-gtx-1060-vs-geforce-gtx-670/

GTX 670 vs GTX 980Ti
http://www.hwcompare.com/18822/geforce-gtx-980-ti-vs-geforce-gtx-670/
 

Felfirez

Master Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
3,546
Reaction score
0
What about i5 2400? Should I upgrade?

Just upgraded gpu from gtx670 to gtx1060 but didnt feel much difference... could it be cpu / ram bottleneck?

Did you do a clean driver install? It should be a significant difference. And no its not bottlenecking.

That is because you've replaced your old card with a slightly similar performing card. Basically, not even a worthy upgrade. If you would have bought the 900 series cards like the 980 Ti that has now been priced below $500 on Carousell, then you would have seen a major boost to performance. You have literally just wasted hundreds of dollars for an updated architecture of the 670 pretty much. Performance hasn't been improved much over the years thanks to AMD not being a worthy competitor to push a major innovation in the GPU and CPU industry these past few years.

GTX 670 vs GTX 1060
http://www.hwcompare.com/31227/geforce-gtx-1060-vs-geforce-gtx-670/

GTX 670 vs GTX 980Ti
http://www.hwcompare.com/18822/geforce-gtx-980-ti-vs-geforce-gtx-670/

Er.. No. A gtx1060 has performance level about the same as a GTX titan Black...
 

peterchan75

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2003
Messages
6,718
Reaction score
529
After AMD took the Digital's Alpha architecture, there wasn't much improvement after that. Stumbling year after year. Intel just turn on the cruise control as there is no competitor left. Maybe tiong-cock can doing something now that AMD has joint venture with them.
 
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
240
Reaction score
0
Did you do a clean driver install? It should be a significant difference. And no its not bottlenecking.

Er.. No. A gtx1060 has performance level about the same as a GTX titan Black...

Sorry for the late reply. Was on reservist.

Will try a full clean/fresh install tonight.

Just to set the context, my main point of comparison is playing overwatch 1080p at 144hz. I play on the lowest setting on the gtx670 so as to consistently get > 144fps. I thought I could raise some of the settings after switching to gtx1060. However, if I were to raise the textures and stuff to medium, I would sometimes drop below 144fps and I didn't like it.

Hence, I didn't really feel much of a difference on the upgrade.

Also, when talking about bottlenecking, its in the context of the above + trying to stream with shadowplay. It seems like the CPU is consistently reaching 90% to 100% (GPU remains around 60%) and my frame rates drop noticeably. My impression is that shadowplay uses GPU (NVenc) and should not affect CPU?

EDIT: Just reviewed my footages. I realised that I also reach around 90% CPU without shadowplay streaming... However, I can notice lag/frame drops with streaming compared to not streaming.

EDIT2: Here a non-streaming version of my gameplay with the CPU and GPU % on the top left corner. Looks like CPU bottlenecking to me?
 
Last edited:
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top