https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...0iktBiL_H8Yb9ES918_aem_ZhtMeTgQv6eaCLtZLqoQgQ
Don't thank me for this, to me as well as many we do question the motive of BCRS.
Especially what's the rush that I wrote to NEA and never thought they heard my concern that
they push out a extension.
How many retailers are in frantic rush to clear their stocks ahead of the October 1st deadline?
With less than 2 weeks time TBH is not enough that is why lucky NEA allowed further extension.
By than October 1st, stocks without lable will be given out.
For retailers and distributor these ex-stocks will lose in profits but what to do?
Don't comply go jail because you never comply.
That's why in my email I also say this BCRS is not a recycling initiative at all.
Just some civil servant idea got pass up the chain than made into law.
If you don't comply you go jail and this is draconian law.
A initiative like recycling should be voluntary basis and if force that is not a initiative but a order under law.
Business with stocks you haven't clear, do apply for extension.
Don't come find me and thank me for this.