Stop conflating irrelevant issues - being born with different gifts and hailing from different socioeconomic backgrounds giving you an edge is one thing, competing in a singing competition where one gets to pick his own song and everyone else doesn't isn't.
By your twisted logic, just because the system is bent, you should still keep supporting the "best" singer in
spite of his inherent advantages created by the system simply perpetuates the crooked system?
Even leaving aside the obvious political manipulations of gerrymandering, the EBRC could delineate constituencies one electoral cycle ahead (ie. 5 years ahead - release the new boundaries within 3 months of the conclusion of this GE for the next one) if they wanted - unless you are daft enough to think demographic changes and new building estates emerge overnight.
From the time a new BTO is open for application until key collection - are you saying that process is < 5 years? If not, what's difficult in releasing the EBRC report 5 years ahead of time?
EBRC purpose for craving out is to maintain the ratio of resident to MP at a consistent level. Every 5 years new voters come in old voters gone etc - You seem deeply confused by your own arguments (no wonder it's troubling when daft voters like you are aplenty). The EBRC's role is merely to demarcate electoral boundaries (this would allow opposition parties to "walk the ground").
The
updating of the Registers of Electors is the actual process of finalizing the electors (this is done periodically - (
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/sin...-revised-prime-minister-lawrence-wong-4348956) one was done in mid-2024 before another exercise was carried out in Feb 2025 (
https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...ated-public-inspection-open-from-feb-15-to-28) - within a parliamentary term anyway, it does not just happen near a GE) which would cater for recent deaths, qualifying new voters (those who turn 21 and are eligible to vote) and address changes (moving to a new constituency).
In fact, the late release of the report by EBRC on electoral boundaries is a meaningless drain on taxpayer's money anyway given this would necessarily render previous updating on the Registers of Electors meaningless as voters will need to be assigned to the updated constituencies.
Nothing suggests the two processes need to be in tandem and happen simultaneously.