General S-REITs Discussion Thread

Genosis

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2015
Messages
10,104
Reaction score
6
aht kena shotgun liao.. zzzz

need to take 2 years of panadol liao haha

This type of thing can take a turn for the unexpected......

Take the bidding war for Starwood hotels. Many people thought Anbang will win in the end, but.....:s22:
 

winorlose

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2012
Messages
16,703
Reaction score
368
This type of thing can take a turn for the unexpected......

Take the bidding war for Starwood hotels. Many people thought Anbang will win in the end, but.....:s22:

ya lo guai guai take my 0.1 div a year liao :o

damn.. tat was fast.. tot will takeover for sure since its like a 4-5corner fight
 

Minx99

Master Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2013
Messages
2,905
Reaction score
0
ya lo guai guai take my 0.1 div a year liao :o

damn.. tat was fast.. tot will takeover for sure since its like a 4-5corner fight
Many tend to ignore the downside when they speculate. This is a classic example of how things can turn out wrong. That's why I prefer to follow the way of the turtle, slow and steady gains versus overnight riches. ;)
 

NewInvestor

Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2014
Messages
7,341
Reaction score
3
http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/eat-drink-man-woman-16/rafflesian-stockmarket-portfolio-trading-journal-investment-masterplan-2016-17-a-5284555.html

Pro kanna burned too

GG



Traders sometimes win, sometime lose. Impossible to win everytime.
 

Milo-Dino

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
May 15, 2009
Messages
72,282
Reaction score
31,138
ya lo guai guai take my 0.1 div a year liao :o

damn.. tat was fast.. tot will takeover for sure since its like a 4-5corner fight
bro... from calculations.. it's not 10c per year dvd leh...

it's around 5+c .... based on last quarter 1.4c.. den full year 5.6c
 

Minx99

Master Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2013
Messages
2,905
Reaction score
0
yeah me too

I tend not to speculate on take over deals or any risk arbitrage, I feel that its too risky and I do not have an edge in this area

prefer to stick to my simple value investing

just buy and hold great companies with solid long term track record of good earnings and dividends
On the other hand, if the company feel generous and want to hand me some extra cash every now and then, I am not really against it :s13:
 

Dyhalt

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
1,297
Reaction score
2
Capital gains is what makes you rich...

But dividends is what keeps you sleep soundly at night.

Power of CD :D ~ REITs for dividends
 

Layers

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2004
Messages
16,912
Reaction score
0
f91WRuXl.jpg

Crct send hardcopy sia. Not cd

Sent from Sony E6853 using GAGT
 

akwl88

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2016
Messages
10,697
Reaction score
1
http://investproperlyleh.blogspot.sg/2016/04/the-dangers-of-investing-in-reits-with.html

Recommendations:

By setting up a screen and ranking stocks based on
Debt/asset <38% (I don't want to get dilution, 38% is usually a danger level)
Operating cash flow vs dividends per share (cash in should be more than cash out, to show that mgmt. can afford to pay growing dividends)
Price/Dividends per unit (inverted dividend yield to measure cheapness)
Price/Nav (same valuation method as property stocks)
Positive dividend growth (negative dividend growth comes as a double whammy of both lower prices and yield
Yield: yes I look at it last
Here are my few picks so far


Aims capital reit (buy at 1.3)


Debt/asset = 31%
Operating cash flow vs dividends per share: 7% buffer
Price/Dividends per unit: -1% undervalued vs 5 year historical
Price/Nav: -2% vs historical
Positive dividend growth: yes
Yield: 8.4%
Frasers commercial trust (bought at 1.25)


Debt/asset = 36%
Operating cash flow vs dividends per share: 2% buffer, due to recent placement
Price/Dividends per unit: -16% vs 5 year historical
Price/Nav: 2% overvalued vs historical
Positive dividend growth: flat
Yield: 8%
Starhill global (bought at 0.78)


Debt/asset = 35%
Operating cash flow vs dividends per share: slim -0.83% buffer
Price/Dividends per unit: -10% vs 5 year historical
Price/Nav: 3% overvalued vs historical
Positive dividend growth: flat
Yield: 6.6%
 

Perisher

Greater Supremacy Member
Deluxe Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
84,162
Reaction score
10,088
http://investproperlyleh.blogspot.sg/2016/04/the-dangers-of-investing-in-reits-with.html

Recommendations:

By setting up a screen and ranking stocks based on
Debt/asset <38% (I don't want to get dilution, 38% is usually a danger level)
Operating cash flow vs dividends per share (cash in should be more than cash out, to show that mgmt. can afford to pay growing dividends)
Price/Dividends per unit (inverted dividend yield to measure cheapness)
Price/Nav (same valuation method as property stocks)
Positive dividend growth (negative dividend growth comes as a double whammy of both lower prices and yield
Yield: yes I look at it last
Here are my few picks so far


Aims capital reit (buy at 1.3)


Debt/asset = 31%
Operating cash flow vs dividends per share: 7% buffer
Price/Dividends per unit: -1% undervalued vs 5 year historical
Price/Nav: -2% vs historical
Positive dividend growth: yes
Yield: 8.4%
Frasers commercial trust (bought at 1.25)


Debt/asset = 36%
Operating cash flow vs dividends per share: 2% buffer, due to recent placement
Price/Dividends per unit: -16% vs 5 year historical
Price/Nav: 2% overvalued vs historical
Positive dividend growth: flat
Yield: 8%
Starhill global (bought at 0.78)


Debt/asset = 35%
Operating cash flow vs dividends per share: slim -0.83% buffer
Price/Dividends per unit: -10% vs 5 year historical
Price/Nav: 3% overvalued vs historical
Positive dividend growth: flat
Yield: 6.6%

Is this your blog?
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top