thretiredDad
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2004
- Messages
- 12,717
- Reaction score
- 5,238
When the dividends you get annually is twice your expenditure (for a big safety margin), then you can retire loh. Since you got kids, after you uplorry, you can pass them your reits as an inheritance. A good reit is like a goose that lays golden eggs which get bigger and bigger over the years.
If you want to retire via drawing down of capital, then just have a classic mix of reits / equities and bonds.
That’s one way to look at it, but I see it differently.
If you treat REITs as “golden geese,” you also have to accept that the goose itself may shrink in size over time. Dividends can be cut, property values can drop, and your capital isn’t guaranteed. Passing down REITs as inheritance sounds nice, but it depends on whether the REIT is still performing well years later.
With bonds, you get your coupons and eventually your principal back at par (unless the issuer defaults). There’s a built-in certainty at maturity or when the bond is called.
But with REITs, while the dividends may look attractive, the capital value can fluctuate — and there’s no guarantee it will recover to your original investment amount + dilution or rights issue
Many people make the mistake of buying REITs as a substitute, just because they can’t afford the minimum $250,000 ticket size for bonds. But fundamentally, they are not the same product
That’s why I always say: don’t confuse REITs with bonds.
