Yea, I rotate between the p50p (chinese OS), vivo70p+ (chinese OS), X1m3 (HK) and S21U (HK) currently and have access to wife's i12p and kid's p4a.
X1m3 is my jog/action phone currently, in ample light with its superior AF, it has its worth in the midst of action.
I hate HWZ forum's photo attachment logic and will not bother attaching proof or comparison photos so up to you to choose to believe or not.
For still images, if the subject are still and not moving (like your awesome watches), it makes the process much easier.
I tend to take images of my fidgety 8yo & 5yo and pomsky (dog).
Out of my 4 phones mentioned, in low light (like outdoor dusk and later timing with some street light), X1m3 is easily the worst (yes, even more than p4a, unfortunately, I genuinely wish that is not the case for the $ I paid). I am referring to auto mode or force/manual shutter speed to 1/30 to1/50
Auto-mode force and mandate a 1.5-2sec night-mode ish shot which is not usable as long as the subject is in some sort of motion. While shutter speed ranging from 1/30 to 1/50 produces a painted mesh most (80-90%ish?) of the time ( regardless how good the eye AF is).
In comparison, with the v70p+, there is a sport mode which i just need to toggle and shoot away and wooahh.... 30-40% (6 or 8 out of 20) of the shots taken are actually impressive in those conditions with a smartphone sensor (again, my fidgety kids and dogs) and usable, compared to X1m3's 5% (or 1 out of 20 ish).
Yes, one can argue that I should manually set the X1m3 proper, then again, i'll rather bring my alpha1 if that is the case XD
I apologize on side tracking to other phones.
For the above scenario, I mentioned that Pixel4a actually takes a better quickie low light shot vs X1m3 which really showcase pixel's software power with much inferior hardware.
Do take note that past generations of pixel did not change much on the camera and its sensor and they have been tuning their software to that for quite a while.
Funny thing is that with pixel 6, its seemed that their software have yet to be fully and optimally tuned to the upgraded and new sensor and lens yet. Also likely that tensor (which is an exynos variant) is not powerful and mature enough to power through image processing of pixel 6. Vivo70p+'s additional dedicated imaging chip (on top of SD 888+) seemed to be doing a better job in comparison.
The good thing is that software are easier to improve on (with google's good track record on computational photography) VS hardware. So pixel 6 can only get better with time. The future is bright!