xiaosinsinful
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2011
- Messages
- 23,626
- Reaction score
- 13,254
What or which logic proves God doesn't exist?
Have you conducted any experiments with independent or dependent variable that proves God doesn't exist? I'm sure your answer is no. So tell me how you then conclude she is not a scientist.
That is a poor comeback.
The onus to prove always lies in the one who declares the existance. Period.
i'd try to explain this. there's juz too many misunderstandings.
FIRST - it's wrong for anyone to ask for evidence of something that is not there. You can only prove with evidence of something existing, you cannot prove *with evidence* about something non-existent - as it could very well be something beyond your capability to measure it.
e.g. I say there's a iphone orbiting the moon. you are unable to find it, so does that mean I am correct?
well, again Zedmaster trying to confuse and concuss people with his questions. did you see , its just questions after questions. and his words dosent carry any logic or prove. when you ask him to prove that god exist, he just conveniently U-turn and ask you to prove god dosent exist
at least you guys have logical sense to know what hes saying dosent make any sense. Im guess you are atheist too. Again , your logic never ceases to amaze me. If you want to prove something is true but you don’t bring evidence , expecting others to disprove it?
By your logic, Let’s say I accuse you of murder , I don’t need prove that you committed murder? You have to prove you didn’t commit murder?If I say earth is flat I don’t have to prove? You have to show me earth is not flat
![]()
Not a lawyer but it dosent take a genius to figure that this logic dosent make sense.
In case you are wondering , in the logical world (not in fairy or lala land)
For example, in criminal cases, the burden of proving the defendant's guilt is on the prosecution, and they must establish that fact beyond a reasonable doubt. In civil cases, the plaintiff has the burden of proving his case by a preponderance of the evidence.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/burden_of_proof
In case you still don’t get it. If you said something exist , YOU have to prove it exist, I don’t have to disprove that it dosent. Well at least in the logical world.
Must be nice living so naively and innocently.
By Zedmaster logic
Tell me why is it illogical to believe unicorns, Santa Claus , Easter bunny , tooth fairy or <insert any other imaginary creature you like> exists?![]()
if i claim Unicorns exist, i dont have to prove unicorns exist. He have to disprove my theory that unicorns dosent

Anyway, this already proves the "logical and reasoning" skills behind theist dosent it? As long as they believe/have faith something exist = something exist. If i believe pigs can fly = pigs can fly, if not YOU have to disprove it

Last edited:
If I say earth is flat I don’t have to prove? You have to show me earth is not flat

