Glenn Knight – Was He Fixed?
With regards to Glenn Knight, he was a DPP with the AGC and then, the 1st Director of CAD in 1984. He poked his nose into some familee affairs and was ‘framed’ and charged with corruption (Batam Country Club) in 1991.
In the Batam investment fiasco, GK, with his wife, had “joined” TIB’s Ng Ser Miang to set up a company in Batam, working on a proposed property or resort development project. When it was decided to put down GK from his pedestal, they initially tried to catch him for “offences” committed in the Batam project, claiming that he had cheated Ng Ser Miang (misrepresentation of facts).
But they could not find any evidence to incriminate him. So that charge was subsequently dropped. But only after they had found something contentious to charge him with, and that was his earlier application for a car loan from the government. That charge, though, was frivolous and untenable in any serious court in which the adjudication of justice is of high moral principle. But that was not the case.
GK had purchase a Subaru Legacy from the agents in Singapore. It must be borne in mind that at that time Nissan in Japan had taken over Subaru Motors, and so the sale of Nissan and Subaru vehicles in Singapore posed a challenge for the agent(s). The Legacy was fighting with the Cefiro (Nissan) for market share in the same segment (up market 2 litre Japanese sedans). Nissan could not allow the Subaru Legacy to undercut and underpin its own Cefiro by offering discounts in order to get rid of a lot of unsold stocks.
So they devised an ingenious way – buyers of Subaru Legacy would not get discount, but they would receive a credit note of $5,000 after the purchase was completed (i.e. after full payment has been received). This was a commercial decision by Nissan/Subaru, and the practice was uniformly applied to all customers. GK, in order to apply for the government car loan, had to provide the Ministry of Finance with the Quotation/Invoice from Subaru. This was given to MOF accordingly upon which his loan was approved.
Subsequently, Subaru issued a credit note to GK, together with the cheque for $5,000 in line with its promotional campaign (the same $5,000 refund being given to all buyers of Subaru in Singapore).His nemesis chose to use this “credit note” (refund) as the weapon to destroy him. They interpreted this as committing fraud to cheat the government of lending him a loan of a quantum higher than would have been the case by inflating the purchase price by $5,000. In any court of law where justice is fairly applied, this charge could not hold. Reason was, firstly, it would mean that Nissan/ Subaru had collaborated together with GK to cheat the government (which was not the case); and secondly, all other buyers of Subaru vehicles who had obtained finances from their employers or the finance companies has also cheat under similar circumstances (which again was not the case).
Being a qualified lawyer, why didn’t GK fight his case based on this tenable ground? He knew his time was up, if they had lost this case in court they would have trumped up some other charges, and the next one could even involve punishment would could be more punitive than the last (to teach him a lesson he’ll never forget). He was convicted and jailed for this offence, and debarred from legal practice. So, he was initially sentenced to 3 months imprisonment but his appeal was successful and was reduced to 1 day imprisonment and a fine. The appeal Judge then was L P Thean.
Glenn was lucky to get off with a slap on the wrist for his offences (whether framed or not) because of his close connections with many TOP officials and that he was intended to a cursory warning for those know too much . Another Head of CFB in CID although charged with the same offence didn’t get the 1 day’s jail and fined. His name was Wilfred Adrian Nathan.
Anyway, slap or no slap on the wrist, Glenn was out of the game and went into the low. He was disbarred by the High Court. After his release from jail, he gave up his SICC membership, sold his bunglow in Frankel estate and a terrace house in Balestier. He move to a 3 room flat at Telok Blangah.
You could see help out in his wife’s Pub in Boat Quay, where he either chat and drank with TOP officials and lawyers chatting and drinking with him, seeking solace from the booze. He kept his gap shut about the real story behind his conviction, hoping for deliverance. He could not practise law, but some from the legal fraternity paid him on piecemeal basis for legal advisory work from time to time to keep him financially alive (great friends he got).
He was later reinstated in 2007 as a lawyer and joined the law firm Bernard & Rada Law Corporation. Surprisingly during his reinstatement application hearing, K Shanmugam backed Mr Knight’s strength of character and CJ Chan Sek Keong and 2 other Judges allowed his reinstatement to the Bar.
His removal from office is construed as a blessing for Sinkapore, in disguise. Glenn was a PAP man and would have been an great asset for the PAPies had he not stuck his nose into where it doesn’t belong. Had he stayed on, he would most probably be a formidable force to be reckon with, for the opposition, that is.