Intel delay Broadwell again.

Gattberserk

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
10,589
Reaction score
901
Intel delays higher-end



Now Skylake get release way earlier than Broadwell... my solution, Just skip BW and focus on SL.


Seriously I hope SL dont get pushed back if not I will be damn pissed.
 

Felfirez

Master Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
3,546
Reaction score
0
That explains alot for the existence of DC. I don't find any sense in have dc at all for Intel.
 

muddle

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2000
Messages
6,988
Reaction score
0
Yup. Scrap broadwell. Release next architecture with ddr4 and more sata express ports please.
 

Kairos

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2009
Messages
2,252
Reaction score
63
Intel delays higher-end



Now Skylake get release way earlier than Broadwell... my solution, Just skip BW and focus on SL.


Seriously I hope SL dont get pushed back if not I will be damn pissed.


Skylake and Broadwell are using 14nm process.
If Broadwell having yield issue, same for Skylake.

On top of that, Intel usually follows tick tock model. There is also no competition from AMD. So no hurry to release Skylake.

Meanwhile, get a DC and enjoy. :D
 

devilwahaha

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
2,366
Reaction score
0
I really wonder how the probably 10-15% increase in IPC or ddr4 ram for these next or next next gens will really benefit you guys to justify such rage :s8:
 

SEvsNK

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2004
Messages
22,599
Reaction score
517
Release also wait for reviews, after that wait for price drop. Alot more to wait
 

muddle

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2000
Messages
6,988
Reaction score
0
I really wonder how the probably 10-15% increase in IPC or ddr4 ram for these next or next next gens will really benefit you guys to justify such rage :s8:

Its not that i need ddr4 support. I just hate to buy something that is months away from being obsolete. I remember i bought an expensive agp card only to be rendered obsolete by pci express.
 

haylui

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
29,769
Reaction score
91
Intel delay anything end user can't do anything. Since no user will choose amd to show how pissed they are, i don't think delay will cause damage to Intel anyway and Intel also don't give a damn....
 

muddle

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2000
Messages
6,988
Reaction score
0
Intel delay anything end user can't do anything. Since no user will choose amd to show how pissed they are, i don't think delay will cause damage to Intel anyway and Intel also don't give a damn....

In consumer space, what more do u want? Already have 2, 3, 4 ghz clockspeeds, have integrated gpu so no need to purchase discreet gpu for low power builds, support 32gb ram more than enough for most consumers, multi-core variants to speed up ur tasks, etc.
 

twentytwoeighty

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
1,196
Reaction score
0
Sigh.... this is what happens when there is no competition.......

There is. It's called ARM, Qualcomm, Samsung and Apple instead of AMD.

In fact hor, I go as far as to say they got so obsessed in beating AMD and process shrinks that they didn't see "good enough and far cheaper" ARM CPUs evolving so fast and suddenly dominating the consumer market by storm. The days where Intel can extract huge margins of CPUs are definitely over.
 

unhinged_loon

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
813
Reaction score
2
There is. It's called ARM, Qualcomm, Samsung and Apple instead of AMD.

In fact hor, I go as far as to say they got so obsessed in beating AMD and process shrinks that they didn't see "good enough and far cheaper" ARM CPUs evolving so fast and suddenly dominating the consumer market by storm. The days where Intel can extract huge margins of CPUs are definitely over.

Intel extracts huge margins from the server market, not desktop. Desktop is/will not be critical to Intel's survival. Server was/is/will be. Mobile will be.

Why the f should Intel care about enthusiasts? The volume of OEM office PCs far outstrip enthusiasts. Intel is not here to please people. Intel is to make a frigging profit and ensure its survival as a corporate entity.
 
Last edited:

haylui

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
29,769
Reaction score
91
In consumer space, what more do u want? Already have 2, 3, 4 ghz clockspeeds, have integrated gpu so no need to purchase discreet gpu for low power builds, support 32gb ram more than enough for most consumers, multi-core variants to speed up ur tasks, etc.

LOL then why consumer still look forward to SL or Broadwell?​
 

Yureak

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
18,905
Reaction score
33
There is. It's called ARM, Qualcomm, Samsung and Apple instead of AMD.

In fact hor, I go as far as to say they got so obsessed in beating AMD and process shrinks that they didn't see "good enough and far cheaper" ARM CPUs evolving so fast and suddenly dominating the consumer market by storm. The days where Intel can extract huge margins of CPUs are definitely over.

those ARM SOCs are nowhere near enough competition for AMD and Intel. At best you're looking at only baytrail level performance.
 

Yureak

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
18,905
Reaction score
33
Sufficient for office work though.

To be honest even in the office I wouldnt want to be reliant on those. In my office dependent on your needs you can even get up to Xeons... But even the lowest end is a 4570... 3yrs refresh once
 

watzup_ken

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2003
Messages
25,671
Reaction score
2,122
those ARM SOCs are nowhere near enough competition for AMD and Intel. At best you're looking at only baytrail level performance.

That is true that ARM chips can't compare well against an Intel chip. However, I believe those multi core ARM processors are good enough for say data centre usage while keeping the cost low in terms of the chip cost and power cost.
 

ykgoh

Master Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
2,782
Reaction score
0
intel_amd.jpg
 

Yureak

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
18,905
Reaction score
33
That is true that ARM chips can't compare well against an Intel chip. However, I believe those multi core ARM processors are good enough for say data centre usage while keeping the cost low in terms of the chip cost and power cost.

Its not practical in our modern datacenters because real estate costs and cooling requirements very quickly outweigh the initial setup cost savings of having cheaper processors since you need many more to provide comparable performance.

Furthermore many datacenters are downscaling and offloading many functions to VDI & cloud services. In addition alot of mncs relocate their dcs to cheap 3rd world countries like India to cut costs
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top