Scooba 230 vs Original Scooba
Scooba 230 vs Original Scooba (5900, 5800, 330, 335, 340, 350, 380)
Upon announcement of Scooba 230 early this yr, we can only predict, and avid Scooba fans will want to compare:
http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/showpost.php?p=51807911&postcount=7459
http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/showpost.php?p=51818988&postcount=7471
http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/showpost.php?p=51858300&postcount=7477
Scooba 230 started selling in US 1 wk ago, so far there's been very few user reviews.
http://www.chipchick.com/2011/03/irobot-scooba-230-review.html
http://www.robotreviews.com/reviews/irobot-scooba-230-review
I initially thought it can do many 150 sq ft cycles due to limitation of water capacity. Turns out charging is required after 150 sq ft cleaning (1 room).
User can select 20 mins cycle for say 2 toilets, or 45 mins cycle for 1 room.
We then ask how come Original Scooba (the fast & light models) can do 425 sq ft in 50 mins. That's 2.55 times faster than Scooba 230.
My answer is: iRobot gauge cleanliness by "removes up to 98% of common household bacteria", so without spinning scrubbing brush & having a much smaller cleaning width, Scooba 230 will have to clean longer to achieve the benchmark result.
User reported noise level is lower compared to Original Scooba, but floor is more wet.
This is most likely due to absence of spinning brush, and a weaker vacuum motor. I believe weaker vacuum motor is due to size constrain & battery capacity/quality.
Only high quality battery can support high power motor, and have state-of-art battery fabrication to squeeze more juice into same package (eg. Panasonic Evolta, RC competition grade cells).
Original Scooba 1st stage is light vacuum to remove hair & bread crumbs, 2nd stage will then spray water.
230 omitted 1st stage, so straight away spray water onto hair & bread crumbs. iRobot states that user must sweep before using Scooba 230.
User reported clumps of "icky stuff" on the stationary brush.
Original Scooba 3rd stage is high speed spinning brush. It's this high speed scrubbing that shines marble floor & scrubs the gap between tiles (grout).
230 only has stationary brush, so scrubbing speed = robot speed.
User reported grout not as clean for 230 compared to Original Scooba.
User also believes that 230 base brush plate is an expendable item, that will wear down & requires regular purchase of new ones. Package already came with a few.
Good things about 230 are:
1) Small & light, so old folks can handle
2) The stationary brush plate can be detached to rinse, so cleaning up after use is simplified
3) The battery is expected to have longer lifespan cos the power required for operation is much less
My conclusion is... 230 was designed to tackle many non-cleanliness related issues. Whereas, the Original Scooba had super cleanliness as priority.