J.J. Abrams commandeers STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS

[Jerry007]

From collider.com:
After new images from J.J. Abrams’ Star Trek Into Darkness emerged today, one little photo caption has sparked renewed interest in the continuing debate over whether or not Benedict Cumberbatch’s character John Harrison is, in fact, Khan. Entertainment Weekly has had a slew of the Star Trek sequel’s images and poster reveals to date, so it’s a bit odd to think that this caption wasn’t cleared by someone in the know. Then again, it could have just been an editorial oversight (and if so, that editor might be about to get the Red Shirt treatment).

 

[wackykid]

international trailer...!

regards,
wacky

 

[wackykid]

newest trailer:

regards,
wacky

 

[yes1705]

Check out this cool looking poster for Star Trek: Into Darkness movie.
http://www.firstshowing.net/2013/vengeance-blasts-enterprise-on-imax-star-trek-into-darkness-poster/
When will Shaw cinema open Advance Booking for this movie?

 

[yes1705]

Advance booking opens at Shaw cinema today.

 

[elbib00]

Big big fan of Sherlock.

Hoping Benedict Cumberbatch kicks some serious ass in this show.

 

[yes1705]

Where can I buy this poster of this movie?

 

[xinng7]

used to hate star trek...

but the new adaptions under JJ Abrams is very good though. now i have faith for star wars 7-9.

 

[dreadknight]

Where can I buy this poster of this movie?

damn that poster now convince me to go watch sneaks-pre .....
then again i have watched every single trek movie

 

[ericwilis]

I thought the movie supposed to release like next week or so. Apparently its already in cinema .
Im also suprised that it is not as crowded as ironman

 

[enrell69]

I thought the movie supposed to release like next week or so. Apparently its already in cinema .
Im also suprised that it is not as crowded as ironman

the movie abit so so only lei though the acting of the villain is awesome !!

 

[Jerry007]

I thought the movie supposed to release like next week or so. Apparently its already in cinema .
Im also suprised that it is not as crowded as ironman

It is having its sneak preview this week.

 

[galliano]

Just caught it @ Downtown East.

I'm a 37yr old, not a Star Trek follower, but I have caught the earlier ver by JJ which i enjoyed very much.

I'll say it upfront .. this sequel kinda disappoints. Yes, there were many entertaining set moments in the film. But it just couldn't sustain its appeal. I found myself yawning a couple of times, chuckled occasionally at the quick-fire banter ... but after the 2hrs. It felt much more like a typical sci-fi tv episode with a huge budget.

And yes, Cumberbatch owns the show. His scenes are the only moments of intense and sheer excitement.

3/5 stars for me.

 

[lampano]

Can watch.
Lotsa actions, but thin plot.

 

[tazzycorner]

Just caught it @ Downtown East.

I'm a 37yr old, not a Star Trek follower, but I have caught the earlier ver by JJ which i enjoyed very much.

I'll say it upfront .. this sequel kinda disappoints. Yes, there were many entertaining set moments in the film. But it just couldn't sustain its appeal. I found myself yawning a couple of times, chuckled occasionally at the quick-fire banter ... but after the 2hrs. It felt much more like a typical sci-fi tv episode with a huge budget.

And yes, Cumberbatch owns the show. His scenes are the only moments of intense and sheer excitement.

3/5 stars for me.

not a fan of star trek either
but I enjoyed the show

 

[Computeron]

will watch it this sunday

 

[ericwilis]

Has anyone watch 3d version yet.
How was it. I see a lot effect purposely made for 3d

 

[yes1705]

I watched the IMAX 3D version. Unfortunately, the actions sequences look blurry because they look very close to our eyes. I'm not sure which scenes are specially shot in IMAX. According the ending credits, they got someone to do 3D conversion. So the movie was not shot in 3D format in the first place.
IMO, an IMAX 2D format will do more justice to the presentation of this movie.

 

[wackykid]

not a fan of star trek either
but I enjoyed the show

i highly enjoyed the show too..!! i had high expections of the movie... yet it was better than i expected... this one is more action packed than the 2009 one... and the villian is 1000x better...!

watched 2D version at grand cathay... i am quite convinced that the quality of the cinema i choose to go to can affect the amount i enjoy an action packed movie...


regards,
wacky

 

[docomospur]

I watched the IMAX 3D version. Unfortunately, the actions sequences look blurry because they look very close to our eyes. I'm not sure which scenes are specially shot in IMAX. According the ending credits, they got someone to do 3D conversion. So the movie was not shot in 3D format in the first place.
IMO, an IMAX 2D format will do more justice to the presentation of this movie.

I watched it at Shaw Lido last night and agree with you. Would have preferred to watch this in IMAX 2D, may watch it again in normal Digital.