lmao is the whole sg ppl suffer.... COE inflated on goods vehicles motorcycle buses transport etc .... anything that brings to your table your necessities are hyper inflated thanks to this inhuamn taxin the end , PHV drivers suffer, the high cost of coe will pass down in rental.
Same as the GST increases, the only way is to ask his Boss, the Voucher Man to give higher rebates/vouchers who folks who really need the transport aka Via SC Baby Bonuses To-up and SC Medical Appt Transport Vouchers. More Vouchers cool tempers down - maybe in Aug National Day announcements, no?this new acting transport minister is trying too hard to please sinkies
Interesting.Dunno whether you all saw the ravi philemon TLDR post.
Turns out this jeffrey seow was LTA director during the 2010s when coe went haywire and it was under his watch that PHV coe was placed under private cars rather than taxis.
As minister, he will just protect his own past decisions.
lmao is the whole sg ppl suffer.... COE inflated on goods vehicles motorcycle buses transport etc .... anything that brings to your table your necessities are hyper inflated thanks to this inhuamn tax
see how long all these CDC vouchers will last them rejoicing lor...... ultimately hyper inflation is here to stay..... COE is one of the number one factorAt the same time, non-car owners are rejoicing ... thinking they can be a free-rider, someone is footing the bills for them. Naivety knows no bound in Singapore.
During school non-holiday times, see so many car owners bringing their kids to and from schools - sometimes these people are the two-car per family type, road cluttering people !I'm not a supporter of the current measures, but I still want to point out the fallacy of your logic.
You are assuming people only travel to and fro work? Outside morning and evening time nobody need to travel?
In that case 100 coe given to car owners would make sense, but since people are always traveling throughout the day, the 100 coe given to phv becomes an efficient system where it provides 2000 trips. Under your logic, 2000 trips will need 1000 coe/cars.
Interesting.
ERP2.0 was started in 2018?
He is involved?
Back to the fundamentals.
Beside government, who benefitted from high COE?
My guess is 2nd hand car dealer who can sell in much higher price for those low coe used cars?
So it is good for them to keep the Coe car price high?
How about PHV rental company? Is it immediate bankrupt if coe price plunges? What will their bank do to them since the asset value is much lower?
So they die die has to keep it high?
How about the banks?

Car rental used to be a lousy bizness to be cause the car was a depreciating asset as it ages towards expiry of COE.
However, since the Grab coming in with Temasek as shareholder, rising COE prices meant that the inventory of Grab and car rental companies do not depreciate. Basically they rented the car to driver - make from rentals and platform fees without the asset depreciating. Very lucrative
In some cases, they can even sell the cars a few years later at a profit because the COE prices have gone up.
pls lor, he can talk and do anything he wants leh. Singapore where has minister's career ended by saying stupid things hahahaLolol this jeffrey siow like ownself ending his own career before it began
Wrong. Those are 4A, I've seen a few just like that in Queenstown, CCK and hougang. They are not 5 room flats because there is no dedicated area for dining room.That's not 4 room.. probably 5 room.. old flat look bigger mainly because of the layout and the small toilet size..