Go and try max out your push up and sit up, then don't have to worry about the run.
The truth is that most active runners focus on longer distances (HM/M), running a fast 5k makes a lot of sense in schooling years. That's because cross country/track races are only up to 5k until you reach uni level.
If your focus is on longer distances, then you wouldn't necessarily dedicate a training block for the 5k. You probably focus on the 10k as the faster running block of the training cycle. That's why you see younger runners being able to hit 17-18 minutes because their training is 3k/5k and their coach only makes them run intervals up to 1k max.
Also, if you are focused on the 1.5k, you develop a lot of speed work to run a fast 5k. But you rarely hear of anyone that does 1.5k training block into their 30s/40s/50s onwards.
It's up to you, what you want to race. If you are racing a HM/M and your 5k isn't fast, that's alright.
Exactly! Different Vo2 baseline levels, different goals. Goals especially make a big difference. If I was just focused only on 1.5k/3k, and then I scale up to 5k, I probably achieve my 5k goal times. But considering that I want to run marathons, I much rather spend 1 month max for 2.4k IPPT training and jump straight into 10k/HM training block to improve my LT2 instead of Vo2max.
You meant evening runner thread? Used to post down there.
I saw the route, there were a lot of turns compared to Garmin HM. The benefit is they provide gels during the race but only if you are used to taking SiS gels.
Agree with you, RSR 10k is an accurate race. My mindset going into non-AIMS certified races is:
1. Run for position
2. Extrapolate the distance you ran to actual race pace
I treat non-AIMS certified races as unofficial tune up races. If I ran a PB, then good for me. If I don't, then it's still considered good training experience. No hard feelings.