Ender
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2000
- Messages
- 18,299
- Reaction score
- 7,919
Share my experience with TrainAsOne Adaptive Artificial Intelligence coach for this SCSM 2023. This programme started with some basic test, like 6min, 3.2km and Perceived Effort test to get a baseline of your current fitness before the actual training begins. What is critical is the perceived effort run, which I found out it has to be your typical easy days zone 2 run. Coz your future planned workout with majority known as economical runs are based on this perceived effort run test. Run the test too fast might result in the AI giving out a pace that is too fast for your Economical Runs. I suffered an overtrained situation in a 2019 SCSM when I first tried out TrainAsONe because of this. This 2023 SCSM is my 2nd time using it, but I am careful with the Perceived effort test.
One main point that TrainAsOne differ from traditional training plans, (JAck Daniel, Hansen, Pfitzinger, HAL, etc) is it doesn't prescribe the peaking long runs of 32km or more. My programme, max was a one time 26++km .. Instead it gives many back to back shorter runs, from 10km to 24km. With a couple of them focus on Progresssion and Pickup runs. These are runs, that throws in Marathon Pace (MP) and faster than MP within the workout. It can be quite intense, and my quads got injured two months prior. The AI was able to adapt to my injury, and gives out less intense workout which I felt undertrained just before the race. I was able to run continuously thoughout the race. The only point I walked was the upslope of Sheares bridge. No cramps after 30km, which I experienced for the 2022 SCSM even though I was using the Pfitzinger's Intermediate plan which includes a few >30km long runs with one even peaked at 35km.
And the AI did a spot on prediction of my race timing considering my unrecovered injuries and lack of speed session.
At least for me, it seems the TrainAsone's philosophy of not dishing out >30km runs suits me better than traditional training plans. TrainAsOne is not 80/20. even though alot of runs are at Economical pace, but a bulk of the effort was at MP, which are in the so called forbidden gray zones of the 80/20 concept.
A short write up below on TrainASone, reasoning why no >20miles run.
https://trainasone.com/ufaq/my-marathon-training-plan-does-not-include-20-mile-plus-runs-why/
One main point that TrainAsOne differ from traditional training plans, (JAck Daniel, Hansen, Pfitzinger, HAL, etc) is it doesn't prescribe the peaking long runs of 32km or more. My programme, max was a one time 26++km .. Instead it gives many back to back shorter runs, from 10km to 24km. With a couple of them focus on Progresssion and Pickup runs. These are runs, that throws in Marathon Pace (MP) and faster than MP within the workout. It can be quite intense, and my quads got injured two months prior. The AI was able to adapt to my injury, and gives out less intense workout which I felt undertrained just before the race. I was able to run continuously thoughout the race. The only point I walked was the upslope of Sheares bridge. No cramps after 30km, which I experienced for the 2022 SCSM even though I was using the Pfitzinger's Intermediate plan which includes a few >30km long runs with one even peaked at 35km.
And the AI did a spot on prediction of my race timing considering my unrecovered injuries and lack of speed session.
At least for me, it seems the TrainAsone's philosophy of not dishing out >30km runs suits me better than traditional training plans. TrainAsOne is not 80/20. even though alot of runs are at Economical pace, but a bulk of the effort was at MP, which are in the so called forbidden gray zones of the 80/20 concept.
A short write up below on TrainASone, reasoning why no >20miles run.
https://trainasone.com/ufaq/my-marathon-training-plan-does-not-include-20-mile-plus-runs-why/
Last edited:

